Reuters reported on the protest in Zagreb, the Croats criticized them: 'Get informed and write the truth'
Na Facebooku je nastalo puno reakcija na Reutersov izvještaj o masovnom prosvjedu u Zagrebu, gdje su građani prosvjedovali zbog problema s otpadom u Lici. Reuters je izvijestio da su se deseci tisuća ljudi okupili na Trgu bana Jelačića kako bi protestirali zbog toga što vlada još nije započela uklanjanje više od 30 tisuća tona otpada, što ekološke udruge smatraju opasnim za okoliš i pitku vodu. Međutim, korisnici iz Hrvatske su kritikovali Reuterse zbog prekratke i pogrešne formule, navodeći da su građani prosvjedovali zbog ilegalnog uvoza opasnog otpada iz EU, mogućeg kriminala i odgovornosti državnih institucija. Neki su tražili daljnju istraživanje cijelog slučaja, dok su drugi naglasili da problem nije ograničen samo na Liku, već uključuje i ilegalno odlaganje otpada, onečišćenje voda i zahtjeve za utvrđivanje odgovornosti.
On Saturday, around 30,000 people gathered in Zagreb for a protest organized by the citizens' initiative "Gospić is our home," demanding urgent action against the illegal dumping of tens of thousands of tons of hazardous waste in Gospić. The demonstration, titled "Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku" ("Walk for Liku, walk for Croatia"), was attended by participants from across Croatia, including students, families, and representatives of environmental organizations. They called for the government to present a comprehensive sanitation plan within 20 days with clear deadlines and to remove the waste immediately. The message emphasized that the issue of waste management and institutional responsibility goes beyond Gospić and Liku, affecting all of Croatia. Saborski representative Zvonimir Troskot of the Most party commented on the protest during an interview with Novi Dan in Hrvoje Krešić's program. He highlighted the participation of many young people and families, noting that the protest impacted generations from sixth grade through university, who are connected to Croatia and its environment. Troskot criticized attempts to frame the protest along left-right lines, calling them ineffective. He accused the ruling authorities of using such narratives to undermine the protest and reduce its impact through asymmetric digital warfare. Troskot linked the protest’s message to the responsibility of institutions regarding the situation in Gospić. He described the actions taken there as "the greatest bioterrorist act committed against Croatia," referring to internal aggression, primarily attributed to the government. He argued that the government, along with other institutions that either participated in the waste management system or failed to respond timely, bears primary responsibility. Troskot specifically criticized Minister of Construction Branka Bačić for stating that citizens should prepare for the high cost of sanitation, which he called a humiliation of citizens. He suggested that Bačić should have stated that the government would handle the cleanup. Troskot also addressed the ongoing investigation by the State Security Service (USKOK) into the waste issue, claiming that the investigation concluded at the end of 2024. He criticized explanations that delayed the sanitation process due to the duration of the investigations, accusing officials of misleading the public for nearly two years. He pointed to the need for accountability, suggesting that costs should be recovered from those found responsible, whether through legal proceedings or financial compensation. Minister of Internal Affairs Davor Božinović praised the peaceful nature of the protest, emphasizing that it passed without police intervention, which he considered a positive sign for democratic values. He noted that the police had not released estimates of the number of participants, focusing instead on the number of police interventions. Božinović acknowledged the intensity of the protest messages but stressed that the government is working intensively on waste management. He reiterated his belief that the current government is the only one capable of resolving the issue in Croatia. Premier Andrej Plenković also responded to the protests, acknowledging the concerns of citizens about the safety of drinking water. He assured that all bodies were fully engaged in addressing the illegal waste dumping in Gospić and that measures would continue. He emphasized the importance of distinguishing legitimate citizen concern from political exploitation of the issue. Plenković also criticized the European Commission's mild response to the burial of war criminal Ratko Mladić, urging higher-level EU leadership to take stronger action. The protest has drawn widespread support, with over 300 organizations, civic initiatives, and individuals backing the effort. Participants included actors, academics, journalists, unionists, lawyers, scientists, artists, entrepreneurs, and even a clergy member. The organizers aim to transcend political divisions, stressing that the issue of hazardous waste affects everyone, regardless of ideology. They call for collective action to protect both human health and the environment.
Go to the primary sources (4)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Gradonačelnik Gospića Darko Milinović je u intervjuu za N1 Studiju komentirao najnovija izvješća Državnog odvjetništva o nezakonitom odlaganju otpada, uključujući nalaz mikroplastike u podzemnim vodama. Milinović je naglasio da je prosvjed u Gospiću organiziran i da je 1.300 OPG-ova (organizacija za zaštitu građana) u gradu, što predstavlja oko 4.000 ljudi vezanih za grad. On je kritizirao usporenje u objavljivanju izvješća i optužio Vladi za neprozirnost. Milinović je također kritizirao prvo izvješće Državnog odvjetništva zbog konfuznog tumačenja datuma uzorkovanja i nesigurnosti u procjenama zagađenja. U međuvremenu, novi izvješće USKOK-a su objavljena, što je izazvalo dodatne pitanje o vremenu objave i relevantnosti podataka.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue around local governance and criticism of national authorities, emphasizing the concerns of citizens and the perceived lack of transparency by the government. The tone suggests support for civic engagement and skepticism toward institutional responses, aligning more with左
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports Milinović's statements, including his reference to 1.300 OPGs and 4.000 people connected to Gospić. It also mentions the findings of microplastics in groundwater and the ongoing investigation by the State Prosecutor’s Office. The information aligns with the cross-sourc
Why objectivity (85): The article presents Milinović's perspective without overt bias but includes some interpretive phrasing such as 'fenomenalno organiziran' (phenomenally organized) and quotes him criticizing the government. While not overly biased, it leans slightly toward supporting Milinović's narrative.
Na Facebooku je nastalo puno reakcija na Reutersov izvještaj o masovnom prosvjedu u Zagrebu, gdje su građani prosvjedovali zbog problema s otpadom u Lici. Reuters je izvijestio da su se deseci tisuća ljudi okupili na Trgu bana Jelačića kako bi protestirali zbog toga što vlada još nije započela uklanjanje više od 30 tisuća tona otpada, što ekološke udruge smatraju opasnim za okoliš i pitku vodu. Međutim, korisnici iz Hrvatske su kritikovali Reuterse zbog prekratke i pogrešne formule, navodeći da su građani prosvjedovali zbog ilegalnog uvoza opasnog otpada iz EU, mogućeg kriminala i odgovornosti državnih institucija. Neki su tražili daljnju istraživanje cijelog slučaja, dok su drugi naglasili da problem nije ograničen samo na Liku, već uključuje i ilegalno odlaganje otpada, onečišćenje voda i zahtjeve za utvrđivanje odgovornosti.
Bias read (Progressive): Reutersov izvještaj je bio okrenut prema ključnoj temi – kašnjenju sanacije otpada, što je postalo osnovni motiv prosvjeda. Međutim, hrvatski korisnici su kritikovali ovu formulaciju, tvrdili da su građani prosvjedovali zbog šireg spektra problema, uključujući ilegalni uvoz otpada i kriminal. Koment
Why factuality (75): Reports on Božinović's statements and includes user reactions to Reuters' coverage. Aligns with other sources on the government's position but adds external commentary.
Why objectivity (65): Tone is somewhat critical of the media's portrayal of the protest, introducing a subjective perspective. The article leans into the idea that the protest was misunderstood by international outlets.
Predsjednik stranke SDP, Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, poručio je na javnom prosvjedu 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku' da je sustav gospodarenja otpadom urušen, a da su kriminalci koristili malo novca za lošu obradu otpada koji je opasan za Hrvatsku. Nije navela konkretna područja osim Gospića, ali istaknuo je potrebu za promjenama u svim političkim smjerovima. Poruka je objavljena kao dio aktivnosti na 14. Festivalu alternative i ljevice u Šibeniku.
Bias read (Progressive): Artikel fokusira na kritiku sistema upravljanja otpadom kao političkog problema, uz naglasak na potrebi za promjenama u svim političkim smjerovima. Iako nije izričito politički stranica, ton i okvir poruke sugeriraju levi pridvor, posebno kada se pominje da su ljudi s lijeve strane, centra ili desne
Why factuality (75): The article reports on a statement by Siniša Hajdaš Dončić regarding the collapse of the waste management system and the protest 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku'. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that the waste management system is failing and that there is public concern over illegal dum
Why objectivity (60): The tone is somewhat charged, with emotive language such as 'gospodarenja otpadom je urušen' (waste management system has collapsed) and references to 'kriminalcima' (criminals) implying strong criticism of those responsible. The article frames the issue as urgent and moral, suggesting a political s
Ministar unutarnjih poslova Davor Božinović nije dao detaljne podatke o broju ljudi na prosvjedu 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku' koji je održan u Zagrebu, naglašavajući da je prosvjed prošao mirno i bez policijskog postupanja. U svom izjavi, Božinović je istaknuo da je važno da se sve događaje u skladu s principima demokracije. Kada mu je upitan o broju sudionika, objasnio je da policija više ne publikuje takve brojke i da ga zanimaju samo broj postupaka. Također je naglasio potrebu za brigu o otpadu, posebno u vezi sa zaduženjem tvrtke Tabak grupa za obradu 650 tona otpada na lokaciji bivše tvornice PPK Velebit. Božinović je također spominjao nedavni požar u Omišu i napomenuo da se još uvijek provode izviđenja oko incidenta.
Bias read (Center): Iako se tematski radi o političkom predmetu (prosvjed), tekst se fokusira na opisivanje događaja i reagovanje ministra, bez jasno izraženog političkog slanja. Ministar se usredotočuje na potrebu za mirnom protestom i efikasnom upravljanju otpadom, što pokazuje neutralnost u izrazu stavova. Nema jasn
Why factuality (70): Contains incomplete information and seems cut off mid-sentence. Relies on similar content as other articles but lacks full context. Cross-source consensus may help fill gaps.
Why objectivity (60): Tone is biased towards the government, suggesting that the media (Reuters) misrepresented the protest's cause. This introduces a subjective interpretation of events.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
