FACT CHECK: No, Malabon congressman Oreta did not slam Sara Duterte’s travels
A claim circulating online falsely attributes a statement to Malabon City Congressman Antolin 'Lenlen' Oreta III, suggesting he criticized Vice President Sara Duterte for traveling frequently to The Hague while President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. works on modernizing the Philippines. However, Oreta's office confirmed through an email to Rappler that he never made such a statement. The original post containing the quote was shared on Facebook by 'Malabon Standard,' but Oreta has not officially flagged it as false. The article notes that Oreta did vote for Sara Duterte's second impeachment and had prior conflicts with her family. Meanwhile, another lawmaker, Bienvenido Abante Jr., criticized Duterte's recent international travels during her ongoing impeachment trial.
Malabon City Congressman Antolin “Lenlen” Oreta III did not make the claim that Vice President Sara Duterte was spending too much time traveling to The Hague while President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. worked on the country's modernization, according to his office. The claim, which was shared on Facebook by the Malabon Standard on August 5, suggested that Duterte was preoccupied with international visits while Marcos focused on national reforms. However, Oreta’s office confirmed via email to Rappler on September 30 that the statement had no basis in any verified source or official record. It stated that Oreta had not made such remarks in interviews, speeches, or any recorded appearances. The Facebook post, which received over 43,000 reactions and 14,000 comments, has been widely shared on social media platforms including Instagram. Despite the widespread circulation, Oreta has not officially flagged the post as false information. His office emphasized the importance of relying on verified information, particularly regarding statements attributed to public officials. Rappler previously debunked a similar false claim attributed to Oreta, which falsely claimed he wished for Duterte’s death. That post was later marked as false by Meta and acknowledged as such by Oreta himself. Oreta was among the 257 lawmakers who voted for Duterte’s second impeachment. In 2019, he faced threats of arrest from then-President Rodrigo Duterte over the drug situation in Malabon. Meanwhile, another legislator, Manila 6th District Representative Bienvenido Abante Jr., criticized Duterte’s recent overseas trip to five countries, calling it a betrayal of public trust. Duterte is currently facing charges related to alleged death threats, misuse of funds, and corruption allegations.
A claim circulating online falsely attributes a statement to Malabon City Congressman Antolin 'Lenlen' Oreta III, suggesting he criticized Vice President Sara Duterte for traveling frequently to The Hague while President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. works on modernizing the Philippines. However, Oreta's office confirmed through an email to Rappler that he never made such a statement. The original post containing the quote was shared on Facebook by 'Malabon Standard,' but Oreta has not officially flagged it as false. The article notes that Oreta did vote for Sara Duterte's second impeachment and had prior conflicts with her family. Meanwhile, another lawmaker, Bienvenido Abante Jr., criticized Duterte's recent international travels during her ongoing impeachment trial.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a fact-checking report that confirms the absence of a specific statement attributed to a politician. It does not take a stance on the political figures involved but focuses on verifying the accuracy of claims. The content remains balanced, presenting both the claim and the rebut
The article reports that Kiko Pangilinan, a prominent figure associated with GMA News Online, stated there has been no discussion regarding whether the impeachment trial verdict against Sara Duterte will be released by December 16. The statement suggests uncertainty around the timeline for the verdict, indicating that formal discussions on the matter have not yet taken place.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual statement without overtly favoring any political stance. It merely reports the absence of discussion on the timing of the impeachment trial verdict, without taking sides or expressing opinion on the merits of the case itself.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.