RapplerIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8812 days ago FACT CHECK: Video of ICC judge saying Duterte should be released is AI-generatedA viral Facebook reel claimed that International Criminal Court (ICC) Judge Joanna Korner stated that former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte should be released from custody. However, after investigation, the video was identified as AI-generated. Tools like Hive Detect and DetectVideo AI confirmed high probabilities of AI manipulation in both the visual and audio components of the video. No credible source, including the ICC itself, reported such a statement from Judge Korner. Additionally, a reverse image search failed to find any authentic footage of her making these claims. The claim aligns with previous disinformation efforts targeting the ICC's handling of Duterte's case, which has been repeatedly denied by the court. Duterte remains in custody pending his trial, which is scheduled to begin in November.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual analysis of an AI-generated video without taking sides. It uses objective evidence from AI detection tools and confirms the absence of official statements from the ICC. The framing is neutral, focusing on verification rather than advocacy.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately identifies the video as AI-generated based on detection tools like Hive Detect and DetectVideo AI. It cites specific percentages from these tools and explains the lack of credible sources or official statements supporting the claim. The article aligns with the primary source d
Why objectivity (88): The article presents the information in a factual manner but includes some emotionally charged language such as 'Wow, thank you very much' from a user comment. While it remains largely objective, the inclusion of such comments could introduce slight bias.
RapplerIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 9518 days ago FACT CHECK: Duterte remains detained; VP Sara not at ICC to ‘pick up’ her fatherA viral social media post falsely claimed that Vice President Sara Duterte had traveled to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague to 'pick up' her father, former President Rodrigo Duterte, who was allegedly being released and returning to the Philippines. This claim was debunked by Rappler, which confirmed there are no official announcements regarding Duterte's release or return. As of now, Duterte remains detained at the ICC facility in The Hague, facing charges of crimes against humanity related to his administration's drug war and the Davao Death Squad. Vice President Sara Duterte explicitly denied making such claims during a recent speech, stating that her remarks were misinterpreted. The video circulating online contained no credible evidence or official sources supporting the claim.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a clear fact-check of a viral claim, providing balanced information without taking sides. It includes direct quotes from the Vice President denying the claim and confirms the lack of official announcements regarding Duterte's release. The tone is neutral, focusing on verifying a
Why factuality (90): This article clearly states that the claim about Duterte's release is false and provides evidence through the absence of official announcements and the denial by Vice President Sara Duterte. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and is factually sound.
Why objectivity (95): The article is highly objective, presenting the claim as false without taking sides. It uses neutral language and provides factual rebuttals based on available information.
RapplerIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8013 days ago FACT CHECK: 2025 photo of Duterte in Hong Kong used to falsely claim he’s back in PHAn article from Rappler fact-checks a false claim that former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has returned to the country after being released from International Criminal Court (ICC) detention. The claim was based on a manipulated photo showing Duterte at an airport, supposedly greeted by supporters. Rappler clarifies that Duterte remains detained at the ICC facility in The Hague and has not returned to the Philippines. The images used in the false post were taken during a thanksgiving event in Hong Kong in March 2025 and later shared by PDP Laban on Facebook. The article notes that Duterte was arrested in Hong Kong on March 11, 2025, and that his ICC trial is ongoing with charges of crimes against humanity related to his drug war policies.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual correction without overtly favoring any political side. It provides balanced information about Duterte's legal status, references official sources such as the ICC, and explains the origin of the misleading image without taking a partisan stance.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately identifies the false claim that Duterte has returned to the Philippines and explains that he remains in ICC custody. It references the specific false social media post and provides clear evidence that the images were taken in Hong Kong during a different event. However, it doe
Why objectivity (80): The tone is informative and aims to correct misinformation, but there is a slight bias toward debunking the false claim rather than presenting a completely neutral perspective. The language is factual but leans slightly toward advocacy for verifying information.
RapplerIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7011 days ago FACT CHECK: ICC did not junk Duterte’s case; post misrepresents old VP Sara statementAn online post falsely claimed that the International Criminal Court (ICC) dismissed the case against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, citing a statement by his daughter, Vice President Sara Duterte. Fact-checkers rated the claim as 'FALSE,' clarifying that the ICC did not dismiss the case. Duterte remains detained in The Hague, awaiting trial for crimes against humanity starting November 30, 2025. The post used a misinterpreted audio clip of Sara Duterte discussing a legal challenge to the ICC's jurisdiction over her father's case, which was submitted in May 2025 and later upheld by the ICC in October 2025. The VERA Files had previously debunked a similar false claim using the same audio. The post also included unrelated footage of Duterte at a 2017 event with U.S. President Donald Trump. The ICC maintains jurisdiction over the case because the alleged crimes occurred while the Philippines was still a member of the court.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the misinformation surrounding the ICC case against Duterte, providing factual corrections without overtly favoring any political side. It cites multiple official sources and debunks the false claim through evidence-based reasoning, maintaining neutrality.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately states that the ICC did not dismiss the case against Duterte and clarifies that he remains detained and awaits trial. It correctly identifies the misinformation in the Facebook post and explains the context of Vice President Duterte's remarks regarding the ICC's jurisdiction.
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the facts clearly but frames the issue around the false claim made by the Facebook post, which could be seen as indirectly supporting the narrative that the post was misleading. While it remains neutral in tone, there is a slight bias toward correcting the misinformation rather
Bato dela Rosa manhunt ongoing – NBI chief MatibagThe National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) director, Melvin Matibag, stated that the manhunt for Senator Ronald 'Bato' dela Rosa is still ongoing. Despite rumors suggesting he had been arrested, dela Rosa remains at large. He faces an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant related to his alleged involvement in the war on illegal drugs. The situation highlights the continued efforts by authorities to locate the senator, who has evaded capture despite being wanted internationally.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding the ongoing manhunt for Senator dela Rosa without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on the status of the investigation and the legal charges against the senator, maintaining a neutral tone. There is no evident ideological slant or emot
Why factuality (80): The article reports on the ongoing manhunt for Senator Bato dela Rosa, citing statements from the NBI director. It mentions the ICC arrest warrant and the rumors of his arrest. While the information is presented as current, the lack of direct quotes or additional sources limits the ability to verify
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting the information as reported by officials without overtly expressing opinion or emotion. However, the mention of 'rumors' suggests some level of uncertainty, which may slightly affect perceived objectivity.
Palace: Source of fake news on Dela Rosa’s arrest to face rapsThe Philippine government has reaffirmed that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s directive for the arrest of Senator Ronald 'Bato' dela Rosa under an International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant remains active. Authorities are still searching for dela Rosa, who has been evading capture. The statement was made by Palace press officer Claire Castro in response to ongoing developments regarding the situation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual update on the government's stance regarding the arrest of a senator under an ICC warrant. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The content is neutral in tone and focuses on confirming the existing legal directive.
Why factuality (70): The article discusses a political dispute regarding fake news and the ICC arrest warrant against Sen. Dela Rosa, but it lacks direct connection to the primary source document about Duterte's ICC detention. It mentions the ICC warrant but does not clarify the legal status of Duterte or provide detail
Why objectivity (65): The article presents a biased narrative favoring the Palace's position, using emotionally charged terms like 'baseless' and 'nonsense.' It frames the discussion around political conflict rather than providing objective reporting on the legal status of Duterte.
VP Sara Duterte to Palace spox Claire Castro: Be professionalVice President Sara Duterte criticized Palace press officer Claire Castro for dismissing her claims that the International Criminal Court (ICC) is a tool of the Marcos administration as 'baseless' and 'nonsense'. Duterte made the remarks during an interview in Davao City following a Thanksgiving Mass. The exchange highlights tensions between Duterte and the presidential communications team regarding the ICC's perceived alignment with former President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s administration.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Duterte's criticism of Castro's dismissal of the ICC's role as a legitimate concern, aligning with the administration's narrative that the ICC is influenced by the Marcos regime. The emphasis on Duterte's authority and the characterization of Castro's comments as dismissive rather
Why factuality (65): This article focuses on the ongoing manhunt for Sen. Dela Rosa and mentions the ICC arrest warrant, but it does not connect to the primary source document about Duterte's detention. It lacks clarity on the legal status of Duterte and appears to focus more on the broader issue of fake news and law en
Why objectivity (60): The tone is somewhat sensationalized, focusing on the ongoing search for Dela Rosa while implying potential political implications. The article lacks neutrality and seems to prioritize the narrative of law enforcement action over factual reporting.