ON
← Back to feed
The government raised $1.5 billion for roads and road works, executed just a quarter and placed more than $1 billion in fixed terms and public bonds.
AR🏛️ PoliticsProgressive15 days ago

The government raised $1.5 billion for roads and road works, executed just a quarter and placed more than $1 billion in fixed terms and public bonds.

The Argentine government under President Javier Milei collected over 1.5 trillion pesos through the 'Sistema Vial Integrado' (SisVial) trust fund, which was created specifically to finance road construction and maintenance using revenues from fuel taxes. However, only about 26% of this amount has been spent on infrastructure projects, while more than 1 trillion pesos has been invested in fixed-term deposits and public bonds. This discrepancy raises concerns about the misuse of funds intended for road development. The SisVial system was established by decree 976/01 to ensure that fuel tax revenue would not be used for general government expenses, but under Milei’s administration, execution rates have dropped significantly, reaching 73.8% underutilization. Reports indicate that the money retained in financial investments could have funded between 20,000 and 25,000 kilometers of road improvements.

The Argentine government has collected over $1.5 billion through a special fund intended to finance road infrastructure projects, yet less than a quarter of the funds have been spent on such purposes. According to La Nación, which reconstructed the financial flows using accounting records, monthly reports, and public information requests, more than $1 billion remains invested in fixed-term deposits and public securities rather than being used for road works. At the heart of this financial operation is the “Integrated Road System” (SisVial), a subsystem under the fuel tax collection mechanism established by Decree 976/01. The system was designed to channel a portion of the revenue generated from liquid fuels into specific infrastructure projects. The Ministry of Economy oversees its implementation, while Banco Nación acts as the custodian, managing a dedicated account number 330.902/9 where all funds enter and exit. Theoretically, every peso should go toward road construction, maintenance, and rehabilitation. The law mandates that funds collected under SisVial must be used exclusively for road-related activities. This restriction was imposed following pressure from the World Bank to ensure that fuel tax revenues were not diverted to general budget expenses, as had occurred previously with Vialidad Nacional’s administration. An anonymous expert in public financial management who participated in designing the system explained that the goal was to legally bind the money to a specific purpose, making it inaccessible for other uses. Since Javier Milei took office, the rate of underutilization of SisVial funds has reached 73.8%. Only 11.3% of the $360.238 billion collected during 2024 was executed, rising to 39% by the end of 2025, a period marked by intense legislative conflict, and dropping again to 18.5% between January and May 2026, with $83.144 billion of the $450.500 billion collected remaining unused. In total, $1.503.252 billion has been collected, with just $394.406 billion actually spent on road projects. Monthly reports from account 330.902/9 show lower figures for “distribution income”, $247.628 billion in 2024, $502.928 billion in 2025, and $331.277 billion up to May 2026, because not all funds allocated to SisVial entered this bank account. Even so, execution rates remain low, with less than 36.5% of the available funds utilized within the specified timeframe. An economist specializing in public affairs estimated that, based on the cost per kilometer from Vialidad Nacional's tender 14/26, the retained funds could have covered between 20,000 and 25,000 kilometers of national roads, an amount equivalent to nearly two-thirds of the country’s road network. While these numbers are approximate, they underscore the human cost behind the statistics. Despite its unique regulatory framework, which excludes it from the National Public Sector Financial Administration Law, SisVial is subject to oversight by the General Directorate of the Nation (Sigen) and the National Audit Office (AGN). However, La Nación found that neither body has conducted audits of the fund’s execution in recent years. Additionally, external auditors, including the firm González Fischer y Asociados, have not issued any formal objections regarding how the funds are managed. While they did issue an “observation” in 2025 concerning the execution of loan 11744 at the Banco de...

1 reports

La Nación logoLa NaciónIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 8015 days ago
The government raised $1.5 billion for roads and road works, executed just a quarter and placed more than $1 billion in fixed terms and public bonds.

The Argentine government under President Javier Milei collected over 1.5 trillion pesos through the 'Sistema Vial Integrado' (SisVial) trust fund, which was created specifically to finance road construction and maintenance using revenues from fuel taxes. However, only about 26% of this amount has been spent on infrastructure projects, while more than 1 trillion pesos has been invested in fixed-term deposits and public bonds. This discrepancy raises concerns about the misuse of funds intended for road development. The SisVial system was established by decree 976/01 to ensure that fuel tax revenue would not be used for general government expenses, but under Milei’s administration, execution rates have dropped significantly, reaching 73.8% underutilization. Reports indicate that the money retained in financial investments could have funded between 20,000 and 25,000 kilometers of road improvements.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights significant underutilization of funds allocated for infrastructure, implying criticism of the current government's fiscal management. It emphasizes the misallocation of resources meant for road development into financial instruments rather than physical projects, suggesting a左

Why factuality (85): The article cites specific figures ($1.5 billion raised, $1 billion in financial instruments) and sources them through reconstructed data from official documents obtained via public access requests. It explains the legal framework of the SisVial system and quotes an anonymous expert, which adds cred

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the facts in a neutral tone, explaining both the intent behind the SisVial system and the current underutilization of funds. However, there is subtle criticism implied by highlighting the discrepancy between the legal purpose and actual usage, though it remains within the bounds

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories