The article discusses the issue of water usage in arid states, highlighting that irrigation is critical for agriculture in these regions. It raises questions about where the water used in data centers goes, suggesting there may be a disconnect between the perception of data center water consumption and the actual water needs of agricultural activities.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual inquiry into water usage patterns without overtly favoring any particular political stance. While it touches on environmental concerns, it does not take a clear ideological position or promote specific policies, maintaining a balanced tone.
Why factuality (65): The article references data centers using little water and mentions irrigation as critical in arid states, but lacks specific data or sources to support these claims. While it aligns with general knowledge that data centers are relatively efficient in water usage compared to other industries, the la
Why objectivity (70): The tone remains neutral and informative, focusing on presenting facts without overt bias. The phrasing 'close to the whole ballgame' is somewhat subjective but does not introduce strong ideological leanings. Overall, the article maintains a balanced approach.




![Each of the 40 cows has its own name, and each year it produces about 50,000 gallons [150,000 L] of milk](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.vecernji.hr%2Fmedia%2Fimg%2F29%2Fb9%2F074e3a1b186c445f135d.jpeg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)

