United StatesOwnership & classification
Founded: 1955
Ownership
National Review was founded in 1955 by conservative writer William F. Buckley Jr. Since a 2015 reorganization, National Review, Inc. (the magazine and website) is a wholly owned subsidiary of the National Review Institute, the 501(c)(3) nonprofit Buckley established in 1991, based in New York City. It therefore has no private commercial owner and is governed by the Institute's board.
Funding
It is funded by subscriptions, advertising, reader donations and fundraising appeals, plus foundation grants. Reported supporters over time include conservative philanthropies such as the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation and Koch-affiliated foundations.
Affiliation & stance
National Review is the flagship magazine of American conservatism with an explicitly right-leaning editorial stance. Despite that ideological identity, it is owned by an independent nonprofit institute rather than by any political party, candidate or government, so it is classified INDEPENDENT (right lean).
Editorial lean
- Our estimate
- Conservative
- Measured from coverage
- Lean Conservativebased on 176
56/100
Factual
45/100
Objective
190
Articles
184
reports
Factual: How accurately its articles report the facts, judged against primary sources and the cross-outlet consensus. Only articles that cite their sources are counted.
Objective: How neutral the writing is — whether reporting keeps the writer’s own preferences and opinions out of the article.
Recent coverage
Flock cameras join data centers as a top AI boogeyman in 2026 midterms
The article discusses growing public concern over Flock cameras, an AI-powered surveillance system used by law enforcement to track vehicle movements via license plate readers. This issue has emerged as a significant political topic during the 2026 U.S. midterm elections, with politicians leveraging public outrage against the technology. Democratic candidate Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan accused Republican opponent Mike Rogers of supporting Flock cameras, referencing a 2013 statement by Rogers as House Intelligence Committee chair. Similar criticisms were directed at Republican candidate Mike Turner in Ohio, who was alleged to have promoted increased use of Flock cameras in Dayton. The controversy highlights broader tensions over AI regulation, privacy rights, and government overreach, with municipalities and activists pushing back against the technology. Flock has defended its practices, claiming the cameras aid police investigations and locate missing persons.
Here's how America's $40 trillion debt can hit your wallet
The U.S. national debt surpassed $40 trillion, prompting discussions about its potential impact on American households. While individuals do not directly owe this debt, growing federal borrowing could lead to higher taxes, reduced spending, or changes to federal benefits. Economists typically examine the $32 trillion portion held by the public. The Trump administration's tax policies and increased military funding are expected to add significantly to future deficits. Rising debt may increase borrowing costs for mortgages, student loans, and small businesses by pushing up interest rates. Experts warn that higher debt could lead to inflation pressures if investors lose confidence in the government's fiscal stability. The federal government is projected to spend over $1 trillion on interest payments in 2026, surpassing spending on most mandatory programs except Social Security and Medicare.
The Folly of Negotiating with Hamas
The article published in National Review argues against negotiating with Hamas, describing the group as a 'terror group' that cannot be trusted to disarm, renounce violence, or accept a peace settlement recognizing Israel's status as a Jewish state. The piece frames Hamas as inherently hostile to Israeli security and sovereignty, suggesting that any form of negotiation would be futile and dangerous. It emphasizes the need for a firm stance against groups that reject core Israeli values. The argument does not present alternative viewpoints or counterarguments regarding the feasibility or benefits of diplomatic engagement with Hamas.
A Visit to <i>The Last Supper</i> in Milan, and Italy’s Still Italy
The article discusses two distinct aspects of Italy, focusing on the enduring nature of Italian culture and identity despite challenges. It references 'The Last Supper' in Milan, highlighting its status as a magnificent yet deteriorating masterpiece, and contrasts this with the continued complexity of modern Italy. The piece reflects on how Italy remains deeply connected to its historical roots while navigating contemporary issues.
In Latin America, the road to Trump's heart goes through Israel
The article discusses the shifting diplomatic relationships between several Latin American countries and Israel, particularly highlighting the growing alignment with Israel amid increased support for the Trump administration. Following initial criticism of Israel's actions during the Gaza conflict, countries like Venezuela, Colombia, Chile, and Honduras have recently moved to restore or establish closer ties with Israel. These shifts are attributed to strategic considerations aimed at gaining favor with the U.S., especially under Trump's policies. Analysts suggest that while various factors influence these decisions, the primary motivation is aligning with U.S. interests. The article notes that Colombia, which previously had strong security ties with Israel before the left-wing government of Gustavo Petro, is now seeking renewed cooperation with Israel and the U.S. to address issues like narcoterrorism.
The Path Ahead for Welfare Reform
The article discusses proposed welfare reforms that aim to support rather than replace existing programs focused on work and marriage. It suggests that any new reforms should align with these core principles rather than contradict them. The piece emphasizes maintaining the emphasis on encouraging employment and marital stability within welfare policies. No specific details about the nature of the reforms or their potential impacts are provided.
'Innovation is now part of war fighting'
U.S. military leaders, including Army Lt. Gen. John L. Rafferty and U.S. Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein, emphasized the critical role of technological innovation in modern warfare. Rafferty highlighted the challenges posed by rapid advancements in missile and asymmetric threats from countries like Iran, Russia, China, and North Korea, stressing the need for continuous adaptation. He noted the importance of integrating AI into defense systems and drew parallels between current conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, where innovation has become essential for battlefield success. Rafferty praised Ukraine's integration of military industry with frontline troops and linked these developments to the U.S.'s push for advanced missile defense strategies. Guetlein echoed these concerns, citing the growing conventional weapon capabilities of adversaries as a pressing threat.
Trump’s Lawfare Against Swalwell
The article discusses the concept of 'lawfare' against Representative Eric Swalwell, suggesting that the allegations against him, while potentially serious, would typically not be pursued by federal prosecutors. The piece implies that such legal strategies may be used as a form of political attack rather than legitimate legal action.
What Trump's cold shoulder toward South Korea means to our allies
The article discusses President Donald Trump's approach towards South Korea, particularly focusing on his decision to reduce joint military exercises with the country while expressing interest in meeting North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. This shift in strategy has raised concerns among U.S. allies regarding the implications for regional security and the reliability of American commitments. The article suggests that Trump's actions could undermine trust and cooperation with South Korea, potentially affecting the broader strategic relationship between the United States and its allies in the region.
No, Not All Women Identify with Lindsay Clancy
This brief commentary references the ongoing legal proceedings involving Luigi Mangione, suggesting that the case has become a focal point of public attention and controversy. The author implies that the trial has taken on a dramatic or chaotic nature, drawing comparisons to previous high-profile cases. However, the text does not provide specific details about the trial itself, the charges against Mangione, or any new developments in the case. The statement 'No, Not All Women Identify with Lindsay Clancy' appears to be a title or heading rather than a detailed discussion of the topic.
The Question That Unmasks Democratic Socialists
The article from National Review asks Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) officeholders and candidates whether they believe Israel has the right to protect Jewish citizens. This question is presented as a critical inquiry into the ideological stance of DSA members regarding Israeli policies. The piece frames the issue as a test of commitment to democratic values and human rights, suggesting that the DSA’s position on Israel may conflict with these principles. The article does not provide detailed arguments or evidence supporting this claim but implies that the DSA’s stance on Israel could reveal deeper contradictions in their platform.
The Week: Socialism Comes for the Sunshine State
The article discusses the growing influence of socialist policies in Florida, often referred to as the 'Sunshine State.' It highlights various initiatives and movements within the state that align with socialist principles, suggesting a shift in political ideology among some segments of the population. The piece likely explores the implications of these developments on local governance, economic policies, and social programs. Additionally, it mentions Luigi Mangione pleading guilty to charges related to his involvement in the murder of former President Donald Trump.
What Makes <em>The Invite</em> So Regrettable
The article critiques the film 'The Invite' as a self-hating Millennial non-romantic comedy. It suggests that the movie reflects negatively on Millennials, implying that it portrays them in an unflattering light. The piece appears to express disappointment or frustration with the film's approach to portraying this generation. The review does not provide specific plot details but focuses on the perceived tone and message of the movie.