IndiaJustice Ujjal Bhuyan raised questions about the underutilization of Article 124(3) of the Indian Constitution, which allows for the appointment of a 'distinguished jurist' as a Supreme Court Judge. This provision provides an alternative pathway to the Supreme Court beyond serving as a High Court Judge or practicing as an advocate. The article explains that while the Constitution outlines three eligibility criteria, it does not define 'distinguished jurist' or set minimum experience requirements. It references historical discussions during the Constituent Assembly debates, where members like H.V. Kamath and M. Ananthasayanam Ayyangar emphasized the intent to introduce diversity by considering legal experts outside traditional legal professions. They cited the example of Felix Frankfurter, a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who was a law professor before his appointment.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of the constitutional provision and its historical context without overtly favoring any political ideology. It cites both the current underuse of the provision and historical examples to illustrate its intent, maintaining neutrality in framing.
