Supreme Court collegium picks new Rajasthan HC chief justice amid allegations against Justice Sharma

Hindustan TimesIndependentCenter4 hr. ago

The Supreme Court collegium recommended Justice Sanjay Kumar Agrawal for transfer to the Rajasthan High Court, creating a pathway for him to assume acting chief justice duties before his formal appointment as chief justice is finalized. This decision came amid growing controversy around Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, the current acting chief justice of Rajasthan, who faces accusations of corruption, nepotism, and favoritism from Supreme Court judge Justice Sandeep Mehta. These allegations prompted Mehta to urge the Chief Justice of India to appoint a new chief justice from another high court and transfer Sharma. In response, Chief Justice Surya Kant emphasized that such concerns must be addressed through established institutional mechanisms rather than direct intervention.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, detailing both the allegations against Justice Sharma and the institutional response. It does not overtly criticize or defend either side but reports the procedural implications of the collegium's decisions. While the issue involves high-level judicial

The HinduIndependentCenter11 hr. ago

On August 31, 2026, the Supreme Court Collegium, led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, recommended Chhattisgarh High Court judge Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal for appointment as Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court. This followed publicized letters from Justice Sandeep Mehta, who accused Rajasthan Acting Chief Justice S.P. Sharma of favoritism and misconduct, and noted that his requests to transfer Sharma were ignored. The Collegium also recommended new Chief Justices for the Madhya Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, and Ladakh High Courts, and approved the transfer of Justice Agrawal to Rajasthan pending his appointment. These decisions were announced alongside other appointments, including Justice Krushna Ram Mohapatra as Chief Justice of the Chhattisgarh High Court.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual developments regarding judicial appointments and internal collegial processes within the judiciary. It does not take a clear ideological stance, nor does it emphasize particular political agendas. The framing remains neutral, focusing on procedural outcomes rather than褒贬

Hindustan TimesIndependentCenter15 hr. ago

The Supreme Court collegium, consisting of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and justices Vikram Nath and BV Nagarathna, recommended the appointment of Sanjay Kumar Agrawal as the chief justice of the Rajasthan High Court. This decision follows growing allegations against the current acting chief justice, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, including claims of corruption, nepotism, and favoritism. These accusations were raised by Supreme Court judge Justice Sandeep Mehta, who has written multiple letters urging the removal of Justice Sharma and the appointment of a permanent chief justice. Justice Mehta alleges that Justice Sharma misused his authority by transferring cases to his own bench and showing preferential treatment to wealthy litigants. Additionally, he claims that Justice Sharma supported the elevation of a relative of a senior advocate and faced criticism from other Rajasthan High Court judges regarding his conduct.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, detailing both the recommendation of a new chief justice and the allegations made against the current acting chief justice. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing, maintaining a balanced tone throughout.