ON
← Back to feed
Former Serbian President Boris Tadic: 14I have been waiting 14 years for this to happen, for this political scum to leave power...
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives

Former Serbian President Boris Tadic: 14I have been waiting 14 years for this to happen, for this political scum to leave power...

Former Serbian President Boris Tadić stated in an interview with N1 television that his current priority is dismantling the existing political system while emphasizing that the transition should focus on restoring order rather than seeking revenge against former officials. He predicted that the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) would collapse because it relies heavily on the capital of a small group of individuals who would likely fracture the organization if they began competing over assets. Tadić expressed personal satisfaction at the prospect of Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić leaving power, describing him as a 'political scoundrel' who entered politics solely for the sake of holding office. The former president contrasted his own entry into politics during a period of conflict with Vučić’s career trajectory, suggesting that Vučić would struggle significantly to cope with the loss of authority. Although he wished Vučić well personally, Tadić explicitly called for the SNS to disappear quickly and asserted that the party’s structural dependence on private wealth makes its fragmentation inevitable.

The student-led political movement in Serbia secured a decisive victory in Sunday’s parliamentary elections, ending more than a decade of dominance by Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić and his Serbian Progressive Party. According to preliminary data from the Republic Election Commission after processing 95.4 percent of polling stations, the coalition known as the Student List won 139 of the 250 seats in parliament. This result grants them an independent majority capable of forming a government. The list received approximately 2.16 million votes, representing 53 percent of valid ballots. In contrast, the electoral bloc led by Vučić, named "Aleksandar Vučić, United Serbia," garnered roughly 1.63 million votes, or 39.9 percent, securing an estimated 104 mandates. No other political list crossed the three-percent threshold required for entry into the assembly, except for minority lists which operate under specific legal provisions. Vučić acknowledged the defeat on Sunday evening via live television broadcast, stating that based on exit polls and sample data, his party had lost the election. He estimated that the student list would secure between 135 and 140 seats, while his own faction would receive around 105. Although official final results were still pending at the time of initial international reporting, Vučić confirmed that his party would not challenge the outcome through legal proceedings or administrative appeals. He stated that the Serbian Progressive Party would continue its work in opposition and would not obstruct the constitution of the new parliament. He suggested that the new legislative body could convene within ten to fifteen days to form a cabinet. Despite conceding the loss, Vučić attributed part of the defeat to external actors, specifically citing European states and the American "deep state." The leader of the winning student list, Ilija Srdanović, addressed the public shortly after the results emerged. Speaking to Montenegrin broadcaster TV Vijesti, Srdanović described the outcome as a long-awaited correction of historical wrongs. He referred to Vučić as a figure who had shrouded Serbia in a "black veil of history" for over a decade and declared that he had deservedly gone to the "trash heap of history." Srdanović emphasized that his team had maintained direct, eye-to-eye contact with citizens throughout the campaign, gathering information on their deficiencies which was then translated into a student-based political program. He pledged to work toward better relations with neighboring countries and the broader international community. "We will create a better Serbia for the benefit of our citizens," he said. He added that the country would never again have a tyrant. The election took place following nearly two years of mass student protests against corruption and authoritarianism. These demonstrations were initially sparked by the death of 16 people in November 2024 when the canopy of a railway station collapsed in Novi Sad. The movement evolved from university campuses into a broad political alternative that successfully mobilized voters beyond just the student demographic. Turnout for the election was recorded as the highest in Serbian history, with estimates placing participation between 67.6 percent and 69 percent, significantly higher than the 58 percent recorded in December 2023. Long queues forced many polling stations to remain open past the standard closing time to accommodate all waiting voters. Celebrations erupted in Belgrade immediately after Vučić’s concession. Tens of thousands of citizens flooded the streets, particularly around the Slavija square, waving colorful balloons and chanting slogans such as "Victory" and "It is over." Car horns sounded continuously as crowds gathered. Several prominent Serbian athletes joined the celebrations. Volleyball player Vanja Grbić appeared among the crowd at Slavija, while water polo legend Dušan Mandić posted on Instagram that "Serbia is free." Former basketball player Saša Pavlović shared a message praising God. However, the atmosphere was not entirely peaceful. Reports indicated numerous incidents and attacks on voters and journalists. Heavy gendarmerie vehicles were observed patrolling the capital, stationed near the presidential palace and the headquarters of the election commission. Journalists reported facing checks on their credentials and prolonged bans from accessing the commission's premises. Reactions from the international community focused on the implications for regional stability and democratic norms. Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, congratulated the student list on social media, noting the record turnout. She stated that the EU is prepared to support reforms regarding the rule of law, freedom of media, anti-corruption efforts, and the strengthening of democratic institutions. She expressed readiness to cooperate on Serbia’s further integration into the European Union. Sandro Gozi, General Secretary of the European Democratic Party, labeled the result an "extraordinary victory for democracy, freedom, and the future of Serbia." He noted that Vučić had become the primary obstacle to Serbia’s European path. Marta Kos, the European Commissioner for Enlargement, wrote that the voices of Serbians had been heard after nearly two years of protests demanding accountability. Former Serbian President Boris Tadić reacted to the shift in power with relief, telling N1 Television that he had waited 14 years for the current leadership to depart. He warned against revenge politics, arguing that the priority must be dismantling the existing system and putting the country in order. Tadić predicted that the Serbian Progressive Party would fragment rapidly because it relies heavily on the capital of a small group of individuals. He suggested that once these owners begin maneuvering their assets, the party structure would collapse. Meanwhile, Dragan J. Vučičević, owner of the Vučić-aligned newspaper Informer, expressed disbelief at the defeat, stating that he did not know how his outlet would survive the change. Media outlets aligned with the previous administration continued to feature Vučić prominently, downplaying the scale of the electoral shift in favor of celebrity news and reality programming. The immediate task for the incoming student-led government will be navigating the transition of power and addressing the institutional challenges left behind by the previous regime.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 4 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

4 reports

Slobodna Dalmacija logoSlobodna DalmacijaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 70
Former Serbian President Boris Tadic: 14I have been waiting 14 years for this to happen, for this political scum to leave power...

Former Serbian President Boris Tadić stated in an interview with N1 television that his current priority is dismantling the existing political system while emphasizing that the transition should focus on restoring order rather than seeking revenge against former officials. He predicted that the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) would collapse because it relies heavily on the capital of a small group of individuals who would likely fracture the organization if they began competing over assets. Tadić expressed personal satisfaction at the prospect of Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić leaving power, describing him as a 'political scoundrel' who entered politics solely for the sake of holding office. The former president contrasted his own entry into politics during a period of conflict with Vučić’s career trajectory, suggesting that Vučić would struggle significantly to cope with the loss of authority. Although he wished Vučić well personally, Tadić explicitly called for the SNS to disappear quickly and asserted that the party’s structural dependence on private wealth makes its fragmentation inevitable.

Bias read (Progressive): The article features direct quotes from Boris Tadić, a prominent figure associated with the center-left Democratic Party, using highly aggressive and derogatory language ('political scoundrel', 'scum') to describe the incumbent leader and his party. While the piece reports these statements factually

Why factuality (95): This article faithfully reproduces the quotes from Boris Tadic as presented in the primary source document. It captures the nuance of his statements, including the call for order over revenge and the prediction of SNS fragmentation. There are no significant deviations from the source text.

Why objectivity (70): While the content itself is highly charged due to Tadic's own words ('political scum'), the article presents these as direct quotes without adding editorial commentary or adjectives. It remains relatively neutral in its framing of the interview, allowing the subject's voice to dominate.

Net.hr logoNet.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 45
Carrier of the Student List: 'Vučić ended up in the garbage of history'

The leader of the Serbian student-led electoral coalition, Ilija Srdanović, declared victory after early parliamentary election results confirmed a defeat for President Aleksandar Vučić’s Social Democratic Party. Speaking to Montenegrin media outlet TV Vijesti, Srdanović stated that the movement had accurately gauged public sentiment through direct contact with citizens during the campaign. He characterized Vučić’s departure from power as his arrival at the “dump of history,” while emphasizing a future focus on improving relations with neighbors and the international community. The article notes that Vučić acknowledged his loss on Sunday, ending his long tenure and triggering widespread celebrations in Belgrade. These elections followed nearly two years of student protests against corruption and authoritarianism, which were initially sparked by the death of 16 people in a railway station canopy collapse in Novi Sad in 2024.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the event entirely through the perspective of the opposition student movement, using their specific rhetoric such as describing the outgoing president as going to the 'dump of history.' It highlights the protesters’ narrative of defeating a 'tyrant' and emphasizes the moral weight

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (45): Uses somewhat emotive language such as 'new political era' and describes the streets as 'flooded with celebration.' While less aggressive than Article 2, it still leans into the celebratory mood of the opposition rather than maintaining strict neutrality.

Novi list logoNovi listIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 40
The first statement of the student list holder is important for Croatia: We will work on better relations with neighbours

Ilija Srđanović, the leader of the winning 'Students Win' coalition in Serbia, issued his first statement following the parliamentary election victory that ousted longtime Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić. Speaking to Montenegrin broadcaster TV Vijesti, Srđanović described the result as expected, noting that his team had gauged public sentiment through direct contact during the campaign. He characterized Vučić’s departure as a deserved end to a period he referred to as a 'black veil' over Serbian history. The student leader pledged to focus on building a better Serbia, improving relations with neighboring countries, and engaging constructively with the international community.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the event entirely through the perspective of the opposition winner, using highly emotive and condemnatory language ('trash heap of history', 'black veil') to describe the outgoing government. It omits any counter-perspective or nuance regarding the previous administration, aligns

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (40): The tone is celebratory and biased towards the student movement. Phrases like 'deservedly went to the trash heap' and 'long-time ruler' reflect a strong partisan perspective rather than neutral reporting.

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 30
Vučić defeated in the elections, Serbs celebrate, from Belgrade unimaginable scenes arrive until yesterday. We're on the scene.

The student-led coalition 'Students Win' secured a decisive victory in Serbia's parliamentary elections, winning approximately 139 mandates compared to 104 for Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić's Serbian Progressive Party. This result marks the end of over a decade of political dominance by Vučić and his party, prompting celebrations among tens of thousands of citizens in Belgrade. Following the defeat, Vučić attributed his loss to European influences and the American 'deep state.' The transition of power remains incomplete, as final results are pending and the role of Deputy Prime Minister Ana Brnabić is expected to be significant in the upcoming government formation process. Meanwhile, pro-government media outlets have downplayed the significance of the election results, focusing instead on unrelated topics such as celebrity gossip and tourism.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the event as a historic democratic breakthrough and a liberation ('Serbia is free'), using emotionally charged positive language for the opposition ('victory', 'celebrations') and negative descriptors for the incumbent regime ('defeat', 'domination', 'regime media'). It highlights

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (30): Highly subjective and emotionally charged. Uses terms like 'humiliated,' 'smashed,' and 'unimaginable scenes.' The inclusion of celebrity gossip and dramatic descriptions of street celebrations creates a narrative of triumphalism rather than objective journalism.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories