Iran's Quds Force commander, Esmail Qaani, secretly visited Baghdad and urged Iraqi militias to retain their weapons rather than surrender them to the government. This comes as the Iraqi government, under intense U.S. pressure, sets a September 30 deadline for militias outside state control to disarm, coinciding with the planned withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi, who aligns more with the U.S., has sought to build a political relationship rather than a military one with Iran. Meanwhile, U.S. Ambassador Tom Barrack has blocked several cabinet appointments, including those linked to former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, whom President Trump previously criticized for contributing to instability. Al-Zaidi has proposed legislation to bring all weapons under government control, which could lead to terrorism charges for non-compliance. However, passing such legislation in a parliament dominated by the very factions targeted by the law remains uncertain.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a struggle between U.S. influence and Iranian-backed militias, highlighting the U.S.'s pressure on Iraq to disarm while emphasizing the political maneuvering of figures like Tom Barrack and the potential consequences for Iraqi politicians aligned with Iran. The ph
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the main facts from the primary source, such as Qaani's visit to Baghdad, his urging of Iraqi factions to retain weapons, and the September 30 deadline. It includes specific details like the Coordination Framework and references to the U.S. withdrawal. However, it adds
Why objectivity (65): The article uses somewhat biased language, such as describing the Iraqi government as trying to 'please Trump' and referring to the U.S. as 'foreign occupation.' It frames the situation as a choice between aligning with the U.S. or Iran, suggesting a pro-U.S. bias. While it presents both sides, the




