United StatesOwnership & classification
Founded: 2019
Ownership
Responsible Statecraft is the in-house online magazine of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, a Washington, D.C. foreign-policy think tank founded in late 2019. It is not an independent company but a publishing arm wholly controlled by the Quincy Institute, whose co-founders include Trita Parsi, Stephen Wertheim, Eli Clifton, Suzanne DiMaggio and Andrew Bacevich. Editorial direction reflects the institute's advocacy mission of military restraint.
Funding
Financed entirely through the Quincy Institute's donor base rather than commercial revenue. Notable funders have included the Open Society Foundations, the Charles Koch Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. The institute states it refuses money from foreign governments.
Affiliation & stance
It promotes the Quincy Institute's 'restraint' school of foreign policy and is editorially answerable to that advocacy organization, not to a commercial newsroom. Because it is owned and funded by an issue-advocacy think tank with a defined policy agenda rather than being a commercially or independently run outlet, it is classified DEPENDENT (the site's existing guess is correct).
Editorial lean
- Our estimate
- Lean Left
- Measured from coverage
- Lean Leftbased on 76
75/100
Factual
63/100
Objective
87
Articles
87
reports
Top stories
Most covered right now
'The View' co-host Joy Behar says Americans 'should all be' embarrassed by U.S.
The Senate's Failure To Rein in Trump on Iran Is Part of a Long History of Congress Abdicating Its War Powers
The Iran War won’t kill dollar dominance. But Washington might.
Hegseth Firings of Generals Draw Bipartisan Concern, Calls for Limits
Bill Maher Is Not Down With The ‘Jew Hating’ Socialists: ‘My Vote Is In Play’
The Belarusian opposition gave the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine a report on the systematic preparation of the Lukashenko regime for war
Recent coverage
Three things to watch amid Anthropic’s latest feud with the government
Anthropic, an AI company based in the United States, developed an advanced AI model called Mythos, which demonstrated exceptional capabilities in handling code. Concerned about potential cybersecurity risks, Anthropic shared limited access with cybersecurity experts before releasing a modified version called Fable to the public. However, the U.S. government quickly intervened, citing national security concerns and imposing export restrictions on Fable. Anthropic subsequently revoked access to both models. This incident has sparked discussions about the broader implications of AI regulation, with some arguing that the government's response was overly reactive rather than well-planned. Additionally, the event has raised questions about the reliability of American AI companies, prompting European leaders to consider accelerating their own AI development efforts. Meanwhile, open-source AI models from China have gained attention due to their affordability and accessibility, potentially influencing global AI strategies.
The law that could help Congress kill Trump's Iran deal
The potential Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Trump administration and Iran has sparked interest among lawmakers from both major U.S. political parties, who are considering using the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act (INARA) to scrutinize the deal. This law, enacted during the Obama administration, allows Congress to review any nuclear agreements involving Iran and imposes a 30-day delay before sanctions can be waived. While some Republican senators, like Lindsey Graham and James Lankford, advocate for Congressional involvement in reviewing such an agreement, others express hesitation due to complex political dynamics. Democratic Senator Brian Schatz supports the idea of Congressional oversight, aligning with broader efforts to ensure transparency and accountability. However, the extent to which Congress will influence the final agreement remains uncertain, as the White House might attempt to bypass these procedures.
Israel and Lebanon sign framework agreement
Israel and Lebanon signed a framework agreement on Friday in Washington, mediated by the Trump administration, marking a diplomatic breakthrough. The agreement aims to end Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon and restore Lebanon's territorial integrity, though implementation remains uncertain due to Hezbollah's continued influence. The framework includes immediate steps like pilot projects where Israeli forces will withdraw from specific areas and Lebanese troops will deploy, with U.S. involvement to ensure these zones are free of Hezbollah. A senior Israeli official emphasized maintaining security until Hezbollah is disarmed, while a Hezbollah-affiliated leader criticized the agreement, warning of potential civil conflict. The agreement comes amid a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, with Israel conducting targeted strikes against perceived threats. U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, praised the agreement as a step toward peace, promising $100 million in aid for Lebanon.
Lead Iran negotiator tells allies Tehran will go to war again if U.S. does not fulfill commitments
Iran's parliament speaker and chief negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, warned allies China and Belarus that Iran would consider resuming hostilities if the U.S. fails to uphold commitments outlined in a recent memorandum of understanding. This statement came during meetings in Tehran with delegations from China and Belarus, who were present for the funeral of former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Ghalibaf emphasized Iran's expectation of non-interference by the U.S. in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital maritime route previously disrupted by conflict. He also discussed strengthening economic ties with China, highlighting its role as a major buyer of Iranian oil and a potential strategic ally. Recent tensions between the U.S. and Iran escalated after an attack on a commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, leading to reciprocal military actions before both sides agreed to de-escalate and hold indirect talks in Doha.
Team Trump squares up to rip Red and Blue critics of Iran peace deal
The Trump administration faces criticism from both Republicans and Democrats in Congress over a recent Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Iran aimed at ending hostilities and advancing broader negotiations. Critics argue the deal represents a significant concession to Iran, including provisions for the release of frozen Iranian assets and funding for Iran's reconstruction, which they compare unfavorably to the 2015 nuclear deal under former President Barack Obama. Senator Bill Cassidy (R-La.) called the MOU 'the worst foreign policy blunder in decades,' while Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) accused the administration of betraying Israel. Democratic senators such as Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey have also criticized the deal, with Warren comparing it to the Obama-era agreement and Markey demanding congressional rejection. Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has been vocal in opposing the deal, describing it as 'the art of surrender.' The 2015 law requiring congressional review of agreements involving Iran's nuclear program may provide a legislative avenue for challenging the MOU.
Forget the Vietnam war 'gap' we have a real credibility chasm today
The article compares the current credibility issues faced by the Trump administration regarding its claims about the Iran conflict to the 'credibility gap' during the Vietnam War. It highlights how Trump repeatedly asserted nearing a peace deal with Iran despite contradictory evidence, and how Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth similarly exaggerated military successes. The piece draws parallels to the Vietnam era, where optimistic but false reports from generals like Paul D. Harkins misled the public and contributed to widespread distrust. The article suggests that such misrepresentations undermine public confidence in leadership and national security commitments.
Hamilton, Jefferson and Trump: Historians see a founding-era playbook still at work
As the United States approaches its 250th anniversary, some historians argue that President Donald Trump's policies reflect the ideas of the Founding Fathers, particularly in areas like states' rights, economic nationalism, and skepticism of foreign reliance. These historians point to figures like Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, whose views on governance and sovereignty align with aspects of Trump's agenda. However, other analysts, such as Jonah Goldberg, disagree, suggesting that Trump's actions—such as his proposed anti-weaponization fund and pardons—would have conflicted with the Founders' principles of accountability and constitutional limits on executive power. Trump's efforts to reduce the size of the federal government, including cutting federal jobs and shifting authority to states, are seen by some as continuing the Founders' emphasis on state sovereignty. Others argue that Trump's approach diverges from the Founders' intent, especially regarding checks and balances.
America does not know its own mind
This article reflects on the historical tensions within American foreign policy, tracing debates between isolationism and internationalism from the 18th century to the present. It references historical figures like Charles Lindbergh and Franklin D. Roosevelt, highlighting their contrasting views on U.S. involvement in global affairs. The piece notes that Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor ended the isolationist movement, but ideological divides persisted among elites. The author argues that today, similar divisions exist between internationalists and 'America First' proponents, suggesting a lack of national consensus on the country's role in the world. The article concludes by advocating for a balanced approach to foreign policy that can unite diverse political perspectives.
Sudan: UN welcomes extension of vital aid corridor amid rising insecurity
On 29 June 2026, the United Nations expressed support for Sudan's decision to extend the Adre border crossing, which facilitates humanitarian aid delivery to Darfur and Kordofan regions. The extension allows continued aid distribution despite escalating insecurity along the Chadian border, where clashes have led to operational suspensions by some humanitarian groups. In West Darfur, aid efforts included cash distributions to 250 families and food assistance reaching over 42,000 people. Meanwhile, cholera cases are rising in West Kordofan, prompting increased aid efforts such as treatment facilities and water chlorination, though access to healthcare remains limited. Drone attacks in El Obeid have continued for three weeks, with recent strikes reportedly targeting a girls' school, highlighting ongoing risks to civilians.
New Solomon Islands PM breaks with China, cozies up to the West
The Solomon Islands has undergone significant political changes following a parliamentary crisis that resulted in the ousting of former Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele and the rise of Matthew Wale as the new leader. Wale, previously the opposition leader since 2019, now leads a government that is shifting its foreign policy focus from closer ties with China toward stronger relationships with Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. This shift comes after the Solomon Islands normalized relations with China in 2019 and signed a controversial security pact with Beijing in 2022, which raised concerns among regional powers. Wale has already begun diplomatic efforts with Australia, aiming to establish a new comprehensive treaty that includes security, economic, and development cooperation. His administration faces the challenge of implementing these policies within two years before the next national election.
Netanyahu has ordered the destruction of Hezbollah infrastructure.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ordered the military to completely destroy Hezbollah's infrastructure in southern Lebanon, including both above-ground and underground facilities used by the group for attacks on Israel, such as tunnels. During a visit to troops, Netanyahu emphasized that soldiers should act immediately if they face life-threatening situations and ruled out withdrawing troops from the border area until Hezbollah is fully disarmed and no longer poses a threat to Israel. Netanyahu described Hezbollah as the most important part of Iran's axis of allies, noting that approximately 8% of previously 150,000 rockets and projectiles remain, and that Israel has killed around 9,000 'terrorists' in Lebanon. The creation of buffer and security zones between Hezbollah and northern Israel was highlighted as a key measure. However, the Lebanese government and Hezbollah view Israel's unilaterally declared 'security zone' in southern Lebanon as an illegal occupation, covering approximately 620 square kilometers—about six percent of Lebanon's territory.
Huckabee: Israel 'the 436th congressional district' of US
Mike Huckabee, the U.S. Ambassador to Israel, referred to Israel as 'the 436th congressional district of the U.S.' during a speech in Jerusalem, highlighting the approximately 700,000 Americans living in the country. He stated that this population size is comparable to a single congressional district in the United States. The claim comes amid growing American frustration with Israel's military actions in the Middle East and rising negative perceptions of Israel among the U.S. public, with 60% of Americans now holding an unfavorable view of Israel. Huckabee has previously made controversial remarks on the Israel-Palestine issue, including denying the existence of Palestinians. The U.S. temporarily moved its embassy to Jerusalem in 2017 under the Trump administration, though few other countries have followed suit.
With Israel and Lebanon, the US is taking a new diplomatic approach
The article discusses the Trump administration's shift towards a more traditional diplomatic approach in dealing with the complex relationship between Israel and Lebanon, contrasting it with previous methods used in other Middle Eastern conflicts. Instead of relying on vague agreements or quick declarations of 'peace,' the administration has engaged in detailed negotiations and formal documentation, exemplified by the recent Trilateral Framework signed with representatives from Lebanon and Israel. This framework aims to resolve longstanding tensions and establish lasting peace, though it acknowledges significant challenges ahead. The article highlights the contrast with earlier efforts such as the Iran Memorandum of Understanding and the Gaza peace plan, which were criticized for lacking concrete implementation strategies. The piece emphasizes the administration's acknowledgment that while progress has been made, substantial work remains to achieve sustainable peace.
Overlooked
Under-reported & one-sided
