ON
← Back to feed
IndiaCulture2 days ago

‘You asked for a minute, we gave 7’: Supreme Court slams advocate while junking ‘wild’ plea against defections

The Supreme Court of India dismissed a writ petition seeking to prevent political leaders from switching parties, calling the allegations 'vague, wild and casual' with no supporting evidence. The petition, filed by advocate CR Jaya Sukin, claimed that party leaders were being induced to switch sides through corruption or threats to their families. During the hearing, the court questioned the specific ruling party being referred to, noting the frequent changes in political alliances across different states.

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a writ petition seeking directions to prevent political leaders from switching parties, observing that the plea was based on "vague, wild and casual allegations" without any supporting material on record.

Questioning the broad nature of the allegations, the Bench asked which ruling party was being referred to. (HT_PRINT)

The plea comes amid speculation of split and internal turmoil in major opposition parties — the Trinamool Congress (TMC), Shiv Sena-UBT and the Samajwadi Party (SP).

During the hearing, advocate CR Jaya Sukin, alleged that party leaders were being induced to switch sides through corruption or coercion, according to Bar and Bench.

"In this country, party leaders are either indulging in corruption by giving bribes, or threatening that family members will be hurt if they don't join the party," Bar and Bench quoted Sukin as saying in his submission.

Also Read: ‘I got an offer’: Trinamool MP Saugata Roy on rebels planning switch to BJP-led NDA; seeks INDIA bloc support for Mamata

Questioning the broad nature of the allegations, the Bench asked which ruling party was being referred to.

"Which ruling party? In your state, parties keep changing," the Chief Justice remarked.

‘You asked for a min, we gave 7’

Sukin responded that in certain states, legislators were resigning from their parties and joining rival political formations shortly after their resignations were accepted by the Speaker.

"One state in East India and one in Middle India, party leaders are joining other parties. The Speaker must investigate the resigning leaders. Speakers call the media, accept the letter and within minutes they join another party. This is destroying democracy," he argued.

The Court, however, found no merit in the plea and declined to entertain it.

"You asked for one minute, we gave you seven minutes," the Chief Justice observed before dismissing the petition.

Dismissing the matter, the Bench said the plea was founded on "vague, wild and casual allegations" and lacked any reliable material on record.

"We see no ground to interfere," the Court said.

Trinamool Congress, Sena-UBT crisis

While Advocate Sukin did not name any state or political party during the hearing, his arguments indicated reference to the rebellion crisis that has primarily gripped the TMC and the Shiv Sena-UBT. Rumours of a split brewing in the former Uttar Pradesh chief minister Akhilesh Yadav-led Samajwadi Party have also surfaced recently.

The Trinamool Congress (TMC) is facing a rebellion with MLAs breaking rank to recognise themselves as principal Opposition in West Bengal assembly first then at least 20 MPs announcing their merger with the Nationalist Citizens Party of India (NCPI). Terming it an "illegal breakaway", the Congress alleged that the move was aimed at helping the NDA improve its numbers in the Lok Sabha.

A BJP MP involved in the discussions told Hindustan Times that the NCPI was chosen to preserve the rebels' connection to West Bengal while extending a symbolic reach to the Northeast.

If the merger is approved, the TMC's strength in the Lok Sabha would fall from around 28 to eight members, while the NDA's tally would rise from 294 to 314. Even then, the ruling alliance would remain 46 seats short of the two-thirds majority mark.

The crisis within the TMC surfaced after the party suffered a major defeat in the West Bengal Assembly elections, ending its 15-year rule in the state. The BJP secured a decisive victory, with Suvendu Adhikari becoming Chief Minister.

The move by MPs came days after 58 of 80 TMC MLAs backed rebel leader Ritabrata Banerjee as the Leader of Opposition in the Assembly.

The developments come as the NDA government pushes to secure support for the proposed delimitation bill. The alliance is currently short of 46 members to reach the two-thirds majority mark in the Lok Sabha required for the measure.

The Trinamool Congress (TMC) had played a key role in defeating a constitutional amendment bill related to delimitation earlier this year.

In Maharashtra, signs of an alleged attempt — described as 'Operation Tiger' — by the BJP-Shiv Sena to poach elected leaders surfaced four days ago, when some Shiv Sena (UBT) MPs failed to personally attend a meeting called by faction chief Uddhav Thackeray at his residence in Mumbai. Then, on Tuesday, the rebel MPs severed communication with party leaders. It reached a critcal stage when the six dissident MPs defied the party’s whip calling a meeting of the Sena (UBT)’s parliamentary party in Delhi on Thursday.

The six MPs reportedly are - Sanjay Jadhav (Parbhani), Bhausaheb Wakchaure (Shirdi), Sanjay Deshmukh (Yavatmal-Washim), Nagesh Patil Ashtikar (Hingoli), Sanjay Dina Patil (Mumbai North-East) and Omraje Nimbalkar (Dharashiv).

Read the full article at Hindustan Times
Source document: Supreme Court of India

5 reports

Hindustan TimesIndependentCenter2 days ago
'Vague, bald': SC dismisses plea for probe into TVK trust vote win in Tamil Nadu

The Supreme Court of India dismissed a petition requesting a CBI investigation into alleged corruption and horsetrading surrounding the trust vote victory of the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) government in Tamil Nadu. The petition, filed by KK Ramesh and argued by advocate CR Jaya Sukin, claimed widespread political corruption and shifting alliances among parties. The court described the allegations as 'vague, bald and casual' and rejected the request for an inquiry.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the court's decision and the arguments made by both the petitioner and the court without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from the advocate and the court's response, providing balanced representation of the claims and rejection. No strong ideological language

Official sources cited

  • government Supreme Court of India
  • press release PTI (Press Trust of India)
NDTVIndependentCenter2 days ago
"Vague, Wild": Supreme Court Rejects Plea Seeking CBI Probe Into TVK Trust Vote

The Supreme Court rejected a plea seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the TVK Trust vote, describing the litigator as a 'serial petitioner'.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal decision without apparent ideological framing. It does not use biased language or selectively present information to favor one side over another.

Hindustan TimesIndependentCenter2 days ago
‘You asked for a minute, we gave 7’: Supreme Court slams advocate while junking ‘wild’ plea against defections

The Supreme Court of India dismissed a writ petition seeking to prevent political leaders from switching parties, calling the allegations 'vague, wild and casual' with no supporting evidence. The petition, filed by advocate CR Jaya Sukin, claimed that party leaders were being induced to switch sides through corruption or threats to their families. During the hearing, the court questioned the specific ruling party being referred to, noting the frequent changes in political alliances across different states.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the Supreme Court's dismissal of the petition and includes direct quotes from both the court and the petitioner. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omissions that would indicate a clear ideological lean. The framing remains neutral, focusing on a

Official sources cited

  • government Supreme Court of India
  • press release Bar and Bench
Times of IndiaIndependentRight6 days ago
'You are nobody': SC rebukes 'so-called RTI activist', refuses anticipatory bail

The Supreme Court of India refused anticipatory bail to RTI activist Rakesh Kumar Behl and his aide, criticizing their involvement in monitoring government-funded infrastructure projects. The court questioned their authority to intervene in such matters and expressed concerns over the misuse of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. Behl had sought bail after being denied by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, arguing he was falsely implicated for exposing alleged corruption in a road construction project.

Bias read (Right): The article frames the RTI activist as engaging in 'misuse' of the RTI Act, using terms like 'yellow journalism' and 'new business,' which imply criticism of the activist's motives. The court's language appears to favor the government's position on infrastructure projects, suggesting skepticism ofRT

Official sources cited

Hindustan TimesIndependentRight6 days ago
RTI activism has become new business, says SC; refuses anticipatory bail to activist

The Supreme Court of India stated that RTI (Right to Information) activism has turned into a 'new business' and refused to grant anticipatory bail to RTI activist Rakesh Kumar Behl and his aide, who were accused of obstructing road construction work. The court questioned their authority to monitor such projects, calling them 'yellow journalism.' Behl and his legal team argued they were falsely implicated for exposing corruption in the road construction process.

Bias read (Right): The article uses strong critical language toward the RTI activists, referring to them as 'yellow journalism' and implying they have no legitimate authority. The framing suggests skepticism toward RTI activism without providing balanced counterpoints or acknowledging potential legitimacy in their act

Official sources cited

  • government Supreme Court of India

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

  • governmentSupreme Court of India
  • press_releasePTI (Press Trust of India)
  • press_releaseBar and Bench
  • governmentSupreme Court of India