ON
← Back to feed
NGMedicine2 days ago

Xenophobia: Anti-migrant myths that have been allowed to fester in South Africa

The article discusses rising xenophobic sentiments in South Africa, particularly around World Refugee Day and the 'March and March' movement demanding undocumented migrants leave the country by 30 June. It highlights the historical context of anti-migrant violence since 2008 and critiques the use of terms like 'illegal migrants' to justify hostility. The piece argues that migration is a normal phenomenon for a country with multiple borders and criticizes the framing of migration as a crisis.

As countries mark World Refugee Day on 20 June, antagonism towards foreigners globally is at an all-time high. In South Africa, World Refugee Day falls 10 days before the 30 June deadline set by the anti-migrant movement ‘March and March’ for ‘undocumented’ foreign nationals to leave the country, and businesses to terminate their employment.

Since April, anti-migrant protests have erupted countrywide, resulting in migrant deaths , property destruction and displacement. None of this is new to South Africa. Since 2008, hostilities against African migrants have erupted in multiple waves of violence that the government has dismissed as isolated incidents rather than a systemic social problem.

Anti-migrant sentiment, past and present, is fuelled by narratives that misrepresent the facts. Language referring to ‘illegals’, ‘illegal aliens’, ‘illegal migrants’, ‘undocumented migrants’ and ‘illegal foreigners’ is used to stoke fear of, and violence against, African foreigners.

A person cannot be illegal; actions can. Migration laws classify unauthorised entry or visa overstaying as criminal offences. In the same vein, migration in South Africa is not a crisis – it is a normal human pattern for a country sharing borders with six others. Framing migration as a crisis suggests extraordinary responses are needed, rather than robust, sensible management and better governance.

President Cyril Ramaphosa recently acknowledged concerns about ‘migration and illegal migration’ and committed to five actions: cracking down on the violation of immigration and labour laws; preventing irregular entry; stamping out corruption in the immigration system; strengthening immigration laws and policies; and improving migration coordination with other African countries.

Mr Ramaphosa called for the recognition that ‘illegal immigration is not the cause of all our economic challenges.’ But more consistent, comprehensive and honest messaging is needed to persuade South Africans of this fact. Institute for Security Studies (ISS) research shows that anti-migrant sentiment is fuelled by perceptions that foreigners exacerbate unemployment and inequality, strain housing, health and education services, and disproportionately commit crime.

Risks to the country’s reputation, diplomatic relationships and business interests from the government’s continuing mismanagement of anti-migrant violence are significant. In 2024, South Africa’s intra-African trade totalled $42 billion, and its businesses across the continent have faced backlash. Several governments and the African Union have condemned the marches, issued travel warnings and launched repatriation programmes for their citizens.

March and March claims that illegal immigrants number 15 million-30 million, and that South Africans are becoming refugees in their own country. Statistics South Africa’s 2023 survey showed there were 3.1 million immigrants in the country (5.1 per cent of the population), including all documentation statuses.

The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, using a different methodology, said migrants peaked at 3.2 million in 2015 (5.6 per cent of the population), and that migrant density (percentage of foreigners of total population) after that was lower than the 3.6 per cent global average, 15.9 per cent in North America and 12.7 per cent in Europe.

The 2025 Human Sciences Research Council’s Social Attitudes Survey showed that South Africans were more hostile towards immigrants than ever. Only 15 per cent of adults said they would welcome all foreigners; 42 per cent would ‘welcome no immigrants.’ Attitudes have hardened, especially among poorer and working-class adults in the provinces of Mpumalanga, Gauteng, Limpopo and KwaZulu-Natal.

Afrobarometer in 2025 revealed that seven out of 10 South Africans (69 per cent) perceived immigrants’ economic impact as negative, despite evidence showing each immigrant worker creates roughly two jobs for citizens.

Most (85 per cent) polled by Afrobarometer favoured reducing or eliminating refugee entry. Many don’t distinguish between refugees and migrants, and believe the country hosts a disproportionate number of refugees and asylum seekers. South Africa is home to about 75,000 refugees and 165,000 asylum seekers. These numbers peaked in 2015 and have been declining since. By comparison, Uganda hosts two million refugees.

March and March claims to only target migrants without legal rights to be in the country, but violence is reportedly meted out indiscriminately.

For years, the ISS has provided analysis showing that the public and government overstate the number of asylum seekers in South Africa and their role in overburdening the Department of Home Affairs. Home Affairs has been found to inhibit access to asylum on the presumption that ‘many’ asylum seekers lodge fraudulent claims to regularise their stay.

Many judges have handed down scathing rulings against the department for illegal conduct such as the un…

Read the full article at Premium Times Nigeria
Source document: March and March Movement

2 reports

Premium Times NigeriaIndependentCenter2 days ago
Xenophobia: Anti-migrant myths that have been allowed to fester in South Africa

The article discusses rising xenophobic sentiments in South Africa, particularly around World Refugee Day and the 'March and March' movement demanding undocumented migrants leave the country by 30 June. It highlights the historical context of anti-migrant violence since 2008 and critiques the use of terms like 'illegal migrants' to justify hostility. The piece argues that migration is a normal phenomenon for a country with multiple borders and criticizes the framing of migration as a crisis.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced critique of anti-migrant rhetoric without taking a clear ideological stance. It challenges the use of dehumanizing language and frames migration as a normal process, but does not advocate for specific policy solutions or align with any particular political ideology.

Official sources cited

  • organisation March and March Movement
Vanguard NigeriaIndependentCenter2 days ago
South Africa anti-migrant hate loses team African support at World Cup

The article discusses growing anti-migrant sentiment in South Africa, which has led to a shift in traditional African solidarity during the World Cup. Football fans from Kenya and other countries have expressed frustration with South Africa's handling of xenophobic violence and have shown support for opposing teams. The piece highlights public discontent over the government's response to illegal immigration and mentions efforts to repatriate foreign nationals.

Bias read (Center): The article presents perspectives from multiple individuals without overtly favoring any side. It reports on public sentiment and government actions neutrally, avoiding loaded language or one-sided sourcing. While the issue of xenophobia is politically charged, the article does not exhibit clear slm

Official sources cited

  • government South Africa Government Statement on Repatriation

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

  • organisationMarch and March Movement
  • governmentSouth Africa Government Statement on Repatriation