ON
← Back to feed
IndiaMedicine4 days ago

US drops ‘Indo’ from Indo-Pacific Command, says it is ‘restoring legacy’

The U.S. Department of Defense has reverted the name of its Indo-Pacific Command back to the U.S. Pacific Command, restoring its original designation from 1947. The decision aims to honor the command's historical identity and legacy. The area of responsibility remains unchanged, covering from the U.S. West Coast to India's western border. The change reverses a 2018 renaming under the Trump administration, which emphasized the strategic significance of the Indian Ocean.

The United States government on Tuesday announced that its military’s US Indo-Pacific Command will revert to its original name, the US Pacific Command.

The move restores the name under which the military command operated for over seven decades.

The decision by the Department of War reversed a change introduced in 2018, when the US government, during Donald Trump’s first term as the president, had renamed the command as the Indo-Pacific Command.

Washington had at the time cited the growing strategic importance of the Indian Ocean region and its increasing integration with the security situation in the Pacific Ocean.

On Tuesday, the Department of War said that the restoration of the name was intended to honour the command’s historical identity and legacy. It noted that the command was established by former US President Harry Truman on January 1, 1947.

“The command operated under the USPACOM banner for over 70 years, standing as the oldest and largest of the United States' unified combatant commands,” the department said.

U.S. Pacific Command…is back. pic.twitter.com/wDaDzbLJ81

— Pete Hegseth (@PeteHegseth) June 17, 2026

The department said that the command’s areas of responsibility – spanning the waters of the US West Coast to India’s western border – remains the same.

In India, the Congress said that when the military command was renamed in 2018, the Union government had described it as a victory and “beat the drum of [Prime Minister Narendra] Modi becoming the vishwaguru”.

“Now that the United States has changed the name of this region, there’s pin-drop silence,'“ the Opposition party said. “Not a single word is being said by the Modi government.”

The Congress alleged that Modi was “completely compromised, unable to utter a word in front of Trump” and that the “country is paying the price for this”.

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor questioned whether the development amounts to “one more nail in the coffin” of the Quad, or the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, that comprises India, the US, Japan and Australia.

One more nail in the coffin of the Quad? https://t.co/7QauDO0a3s

— Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) June 17, 2026

In a similar vein, defence analyst Pravin Sawhney described the decision as “extremely significant”, and said it indicated that the US had “no geopolitical use” for India in the Asia-Pacific region. “Moreover, in the so-called India’s backyard [South Asia], China and Pakistan will now have geopolitical, geoeconomic & military sway,” he remarked on social media.

Written by Neerad Pandharipande. Edited by Sara Varghese.

Read the full article at Scroll.in
Source document: U.S. Department of Defense Statement

1 reports

Scroll.inIndependentCenter4 days ago
US drops ‘Indo’ from Indo-Pacific Command, says it is ‘restoring legacy’

The U.S. Department of Defense has reverted the name of its Indo-Pacific Command back to the U.S. Pacific Command, restoring its original designation from 1947. The decision aims to honor the command's historical identity and legacy. The area of responsibility remains unchanged, covering from the U.S. West Coast to India's western border. The change reverses a 2018 renaming under the Trump administration, which emphasized the strategic significance of the Indian Ocean.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the renaming of a U.S. military command without overtly favoring any political perspective. It provides background on both the 2018 renaming and the current reversal, citing official statements from the Department of Defense. There is no evident framing

Official sources cited

  • government U.S. Department of Defense Statement

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

  • governmentU.S. Department of Defense Statement