ON
← Back to feed
KREconomy4 days ago

Unlike in France, Korea’s unions back higher retirement age. Why?

South Korea's two largest labor unions have united to push for raising the retirement age to 65, citing concerns about an 'income cliff' between mandatory retirement and pension eligibility. This contrasts with France, where similar reforms faced strong union opposition. The unions argue that South Korea's aging population necessitates such changes to ensure economic sustainability.

Labor groups say workers face income cliff between mandatory retirement, pension eligibility

Yang Kyung-soo (third from left), president of the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, and Kim Dong-myeong (fourth from left), president of the Federation of Korean Trade Unions, attend a press conference calling for immediate legislation to raise the retirement age to 65 at the National Assembly in Seoul on Tuesday. (Yonhap)

In many advanced economies, efforts to raise the retirement age have triggered fierce opposition from labor unions, as seen in France in recent years.

In South Korea, the opposite is happening.

The country's two largest labor federations have joined forces to demand a higher retirement age, arguing that workers face a growing income cliff between retirement and pension eligibility.

The debate reflects the pressure facing the world's fastest-aging society: People are being pushed out of work before they can receive public pensions.

Demonstrators take part in a May Day protest in Paris on May 1, 2023, amid weeks of public outrage over a pension reform law that raised France's retirement age from 62 to 64. (Getty Images)

Reversal of roles

On Tuesday, the country's two largest umbrella labor groups, the Federation of Korean Trade Unions and the Korea Confederation of Trade Unions, held a joint press conference at the National Assembly, calling for the immediate implementation of a gradual retirement-age extension.

Korea's current mandatory retirement age is 60, while eligibility for the national pension begins between ages 63 and 64 and is scheduled to rise to 65 by 2033.

The gap has become a growing source of concern for workers approaching retirement.

The move followed the Democratic Party of Korea's announcement of a plan to gradually raise the retirement age to 65 by 2036, beginning with workers born in 1969.

But the proposal relies heavily on rehiring workers after retirement, rather than simply allowing them to remain in their existing positions until 65.

"Under the reported proposal, those born in 1967 and 1968 could face a significant income gap before becoming eligible for pension benefits," the unions said.

They also criticized the government's reliance on post-retirement reemployment, arguing that workers often return at substantially lower wages and that any retirement-age extension should guarantee no reduction in pay.

The issue has gained urgency as members of Korea's second baby-boom generation, born between 1964 and 1974, approach or reach retirement age, raising concerns that many could face years without stable wages or full pension benefits.

“Korea's labor unions have increasingly viewed retirement-age extension as a means of ensuring income security and protecting workers' livelihoods in later life,” said Yoon Dong-yeol, a business professor at Konkuk University.

In many European countries, by contrast, retirement-age reforms have typically been initiated by governments as part of broader pension and labor market reforms, often drawing union opposition over concerns that they would force workers to stay in the labor market longer.

Public opinion in Korea largely appears to align with the unions' position. The labor groups cited surveys showing that 88 percent of respondents support extending the retirement age. Government data showed that older Koreans hoped to remain economically active until age 73.4 on average last year.

Senior citizens gather at Tapgol Park in central Seoul (Im Se-jun/The Korea Herald)

Concerns remain

Despite broad sympathy for the need to extend working lives, strong opposition from businesses and concerns within government have slowed progress.

Employers argue that a uniform retirement-age extension across industries and company sizes could raise labor costs and reduce flexibility in workforce management. Business groups have called for greater discretion in determining which workers are able to continue in their positions.

Many companies already rehire selected retirees through programs permitted under Korean law, typically employing experienced and skilled workers as nonregular employees.

The practice initially gained traction among manufacturers outside the Greater Seoul area, which includes Incheon and Gyeonggi Province, who struggled to recruit younger workers, but has increasingly expanded into some of the country's most sought-after workplaces. Korea's five major banks — KB Kookmin, Shinhan, Hana, Woori and NH NongHyup — reportedly rehired a combined 574 retired employees in the first quarter alone, with the number increasing each year.

However, critics argue that extending employment for older workers could come at the expense of opportunities for younger generations.

According to the Korea Enterprises Federation, 217,000 people aged 25 to 29 neither worked nor actively sought employment in 2024. The figure was driven largely by university graduates and was 2.6 times higher than two decades earlier, as companies reduced new hiring amid rising tra…

Read the full article at The Korea Herald
Source document: Press Conference Calling for Higher Retirement Age

1 reports

The Korea HeraldIndependentCenter4 days ago
Unlike in France, Korea’s unions back higher retirement age. Why?

South Korea's two largest labor unions have united to push for raising the retirement age to 65, citing concerns about an 'income cliff' between mandatory retirement and pension eligibility. This contrasts with France, where similar reforms faced strong union opposition. The unions argue that South Korea's aging population necessitates such changes to ensure economic sustainability.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the position of the labor unions and contextualizes it by comparing it to France's situation. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of key perspectives. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the rationale provided by the unions and

Official sources cited

  • organisation Press Conference Calling for Higher Retirement Age
  • organisation May Day Protest in Paris

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

  • organisationPress Conference Calling for Higher Retirement Age
  • organisationMay Day Protest in Paris