Svisslendingar virðast ætla hafnað tillögu um að takmarka íbúafjölda þar í landi við tíu milljónir miðað við fyrstu tölur úr þjóðaratkvæðagreiðslu þess efnis sem lauk í dag.
Samkvæmt útgönguspá kusu 55 prósent Svisslendinga gegn tillögunni en 45 með. Kosningunni lauk í hádeginu. Þjóðarflokkur Sviss, sem er hægri flokkur þar í landi, lagði tillöguna fram. Flokkurinn hefur lengi barist gegn komu innflytjenda til landsins.
Breska ríkisútvarpið greinir frá þessu.
Íbúafjöldi í Sviss nemur nú 9,1 milljón en 27 prósent íbúa eru ekki svissneskir ríkisborgarar. Ef svo verður að tillagan verði samþykkt í þjóðaratkvæðagreiðslu myndi það stofna samningi þjóðarinnar við Evrópusambandið um frjálst flæði fólks og vara yfir landamæri í hættu.
Sviss þyrfti þá að slíta samningnum sem myndi hafa töluverðar afleiðingar fyrir landið enda reiðir þjóðin sig að miklu leyti á útflutning og ferðamennsku. Þjóðarflokkur Sviss hélt því fram að sú leið að takmarka fólksfjölda myndi minnka álag á innviði og fasteignamarkað.
Fjöldi innflytjenda starfar í heilbrigðisgeiranum, ferðamannabransanum og á hjúkrunarheimilum í Sviss. Ýmsir rekstraraðilar og aðrir hagsmunaaðilar voru því áhyggjufullir í aðdraganda kosninganna eftir því sem fram kemur í frétt BBC.
Í Sviss er hægt að knýja fram þjóðaratkvæðagreiðslu með því að safna að minnsta kosti 100 þúsund undirskriftum.
Read the full article at Vísir →📄Source document: Referendum results→5 reports
RÚV FréttirState / PublicCenter6 days agoSwitzerland has approved a proposal in a national referendum that aims to cap the population at 10 million by 2050. The Swiss People's Party, a hard-line right-wing party, proposed this measure. The proposal faced opposition from various sectors of the labor market and other political parties. Switzerland's population has grown from 7.3 million in 2002 to 9.1 million today, with around 27% of residents being foreign-born. The Swiss People's Party attributes these demographic changes to various social challenges, including housing shortages, rising rents, traffic congestion, and pressure on the
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the referendum and its implications without overtly favoring any side. It mentions the Swiss People's Party's stance but does not editorialize or present biased language.
VísirIndependentRight7 days agoSwiss citizens have rejected a proposal to cap the population at ten million, according to preliminary results from a national referendum that concluded today. The proposal was put forward by the Swiss People's Party, a right-wing party opposed to immigration. According to the exit poll, 55% of voters were against the proposal, while 45% supported it. If passed, the proposal would have created a binding agreement with the European Union regarding freedom of movement and border control. The Swiss People's Party argued that limiting population growth would reduce pressure on housing and the real
Bias read (Right): The article frames the rejection of the population cap proposal through the lens of the Swiss People's Party, a right-wing group known for opposing immigration. It emphasizes their stance against immigration and highlights their argument that limiting population growth would ease pressure on housing
Official sources cited
- press release Exit Poll Results
- press release BBC Report on Referendum Participation
Morgunblaðið / mbl.isIndependentCenter7 days agoSwiss citizens have rejected a proposal to impose a cap on population growth. The referendum, held on Sunday, saw 55% of voters oppose the measure. The proposal was put forward by the Swiss People's Party, which aimed to limit the population to ten million by 2050. Current estimates suggest around nine million people live in Switzerland, with a quarter being foreign nationals. Concerns were raised that the proposal could lead to social unrest if implemented.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the referendum outcome, mentions the proposer (Swiss People's Party), and includes concerns raised by participants without overtly favoring any side. It does not use biased language or selectively present sources.
Official sources cited
- government Swiss People's Party proposal details
- government Referendum results
RÚV FréttirState / PublicCenter7 days ago Swiss lenders reject 10 million loan applications in national referendumSwiss citizens rejected a proposal to set a maximum population limit of 10 million by 2050 in a national referendum. Approximately 55% of voters opposed the measure. The current population is around 9.1 million, with nearly a quarter being foreign nationals. Concerns were raised about potential negative impacts on the Swiss economy and international relations if the proposal had passed. The main opposition came from the largest political party, the Swiss People's Party (SVP), which argued that increased immigration has caused various social issues such as housing shortages, rising rents, and交通
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the referendum outcome, includes quotes from both supporters and opponents of the proposal, and provides balanced context regarding the arguments for and against the policy. There is no overtly biased language or selective sourcing.
RÚV FréttirState / PublicCenter7 days ago Swiss lenders reject 10 million loan in national referendumSwiss citizens rejected a proposal to set a maximum population limit of 10 million by 2050 in a national referendum. Approximately 55% of voters opposed the measure. The current population is around 9.1 million, with nearly a quarter being foreign nationals. Concerns were raised about potential economic impacts and social challenges if the proposal had passed. The initiative was supported by the Swiss People's Party (SVP), the largest political party in Switzerland, which has highlighted issues related to immigration and societal pressures.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the referendum outcome, includes quotes from both supporters and opponents, and provides context without overtly favoring one side. It does not use emotionally charged language or selectively omit perspectives.
IS