ON
← Back to feed
United KingdomTechnology18 days ago

The size of tropical vegetation gross primary production

A study published in Nature challenges previous estimates of global gross primary production (GPP) by highlighting discrepancies between satellite data and modeling approaches. Satellite observations suggest an average GPP of 120–140 petagrams of carbon per year, while a new modeling study by Lai et al. suggests a higher estimate of 157 ± 8.5 petagrams of carbon per year. The study identifies significant differences in tropical regions, where modeled fluxes exceed satellite-derived values by 1.33–1.85 times. The authors argue that the higher estimate relies on data from a single boreal station

arising from : Lai, J. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08050-3 (2024).

Satellite-based optical observations 1 , 2 , 3 have converged to show average estimates of global contemporary gross primary production (GPP), the photosynthetic assimilation of atmospheric CO 2 by terrestrial vegetation, at 120–140 petagrams of carbon per year (PgC yr −1 ). This consensus was challenged by a recent modelling study conducted by Lai et al. 4 that posits a higher global estimate of 157 ± 8.5 PgC yr −1 , revealing a pronounced discrepancy in the tropics where modelled fluxes of 79 PgC yr −1 exceed satellite-derived values by a factor of 1.33–1.85. We show that the global estimate of Lai et al. 4 is extrapolated spatially based on a temporal relationship between the ratio of carbonyl sulfide (OCS) to CO 2 fluxes (hereafter, the leaf relative uptake, LRU) and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) from a single boreal station and also neglects considerable negative influences of vapour pressure deficit (VPD). This finding underscores the need for accounting for both spatial heterogeneity and climatic constraints when upscaling site-level relationship to the global scale, warranting the necessity of a comprehensive worldwide validation for global estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Data availability

The resulting dataset of our analysis presented in this paper are available at Zenodo 16 ( https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18396814 ). The CLM5 simulation output by Lai et al. 4 is available online ( https://doi.org/10.7298/mxg9-7176 ). The flux data are available from the FLUXNET2015 dataset ( https://fluxnet.org/data/fluxnet2015-dataset/ ) and the LBA dataset ( https://daac.ornl.gov/LBA/guides/CD32_Fluxes_Brazil.html ). The data of PAR, VPD and LRU of carbonyl in Hyytiälä, Finland is sourced from Zenodo 17 ( https://zenodo.org/records/1211481#.XB4Lb9IzbIU ).

References

Beer, C. et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329 , 834–838 (2010).

Article

ADS

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Jung, M. et al. Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe: synthesis and evaluation of the fluxcom approach. Biogeosciences 17 , 1343–1365 (2020).

Article

ADS

CAS

Google Scholar

Li, X. & Xiao, J. Mapping photosynthesis solely from solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: a global, fine-resolution dataset of gross primary production derived from OCO-2. Remote Sens. 11 , 2563 (2019).

Article

ADS

Google Scholar

Lai, J. et al. Terrestrial photosynthesis inferred from plant carbonyl sulfide uptake. Nature 634 , 855–861 (2024).

Article

ADS

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Kooijmans, L. M. J. et al. Influences of light and humidity on carbonyl sulfide-based estimates of photosynthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116 , 2470–2475 (2019).

Article

ADS

CAS

PubMed

PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Whelan, M. E. et al. Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles. Biogeosciences 15 , 3625–3657 (2018).

Article

ADS

CAS

Google Scholar

Sun, W., Berry, J. A., Yakir, D. & Seibt, U. Leaf relative uptake of carbonyl sulfide to CO 2 seen through the lens of stomatal conductance–photosynthesis coupling. N. Phytol. 235 , 1729–1742 (2022).

Article

CAS

Google Scholar

Lai, J. et al. Reply to: The size of tropical vegetation gross primary production. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10561-0 (2026).

Maseyk, K. et al. Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide in an agricultural field in the southern great plains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111 , 9064–9069 (2014).

Article

ADS

CAS

PubMed

PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Stimler, K., Berry, J. A. & Yakir, D. Effects of carbonyl sulfide and carbonic anhydrase on stomatal conductance. Plant Physiol. 158 , 524–530 (2012).

Article

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Tian, J. et al. A leaf age-dependent light use efficiency model for remote sensing the gross primary productivity seasonality over pantropical evergreen broadleaved forests. Glob. Change Biol. 30 , e17454 (2024).

Article

CAS

Google Scholar

Zheng, Y. et al. Improved estimate of global gross primary production for reproducing its long-term variation, 1982–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12 , 2725–2746 (2020).

Article

ADS

Google Scholar

Wu, J. et al. Leaf development and demography explain photosynthetic seasonality in amazon evergreen forests. Science 351 , 972–976 (2016).

Article

ADS

CAS

PubMed

Google Scholar

Chen, X. et al. Novel representation of leaf phenology improves simulation of amazonian evergreen forest photosynthesis in a land surface model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 12 , e2018MS001565 (2020).

Article

ADS

Google Scholar

Chen, X. et al. Vapor pressure deficit and sunlight explain seasonality of leaf phenology and photosynthesis across amazonian evergreen broadleaved forest. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycl…

Read the full article at Nature News
Source document: The size of tropical vegetation gross primary production

2 reports

Nature NewsParty-alignedCenter18 days ago
Reply to: The size of tropical vegetation gross primary production

This reply addresses concerns raised by Tian et al. regarding an overestimation of tropical gross primary productivity (GPP). The authors assert that their original findings remain valid despite the criticisms.

Bias read (Center): The article is a scientific rebuttal focused on technical details of GPP estimation methods. It does not take a political stance or frame the issue with ideological language. The content is purely academic and neutral in tone.

Nature NewsParty-alignedCenter18 days ago
The size of tropical vegetation gross primary production

A study published in Nature challenges previous estimates of global gross primary production (GPP) by highlighting discrepancies between satellite data and modeling approaches. Satellite observations suggest an average GPP of 120–140 petagrams of carbon per year, while a new modeling study by Lai et al. suggests a higher estimate of 157 ± 8.5 petagrams of carbon per year. The study identifies significant differences in tropical regions, where modeled fluxes exceed satellite-derived values by 1.33–1.85 times. The authors argue that the higher estimate relies on data from a single boreal station

Bias read (Center): The article presents scientific findings without overt political framing. It discusses technical aspects of climate science and does not take a stance on policy or ideology.

Official sources cited

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.