ON
← Back to feed
NZCrime9 days ago

The raft of recent disability support changes, explained

The article discusses recent changes to disability support in New Zealand, including housing targets, transport cuts, and restrictions on family carers claiming Crown employment status. It notes that these changes have been controversial and highlights the lack of significant action in the disability issues portfolio prior to recent developments. Minister Louise Upston previously indicated no plans for new disability legislation but later focused on 'practical terms' outlined in the Ministry of Disabled People's strategy report.

From housing targets and transport cuts to barring family carers from claiming Crown employment status, there’s been a number of changes to disability support recently – many of them controversial. The Spinoff talks you through all the shifts.

Help: why does it feel like everything is happening all at once?

Because until now, nothing much has happened in the disability issues portfolio. Its minister, Louise Upston – concerned with other matters in her various portfolios, such as booking Robbie Williams concerts – told the social services and community select committee last June that she didn’t plan on introducing any new disability legislation this term. She had recently withdrawn the controversial Accessibility for New Zealanders Bill , introduced by the previous government, and was now focused on “practical terms”.

Those “practical terms” are education, employment, health, housing and justice, and were expanded upon in the release of the Ministry of Disabled People’s strategy report last December. The New Zealand Disability Strategy laid out the government’s goals in these areas over the next four years, and followed an independent review into disability support services.

Disability issues minister Louise Upston (Photo: Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

OK, so what’s changed?

Around the same time the ministry released its strategy, the supreme court lost a case considered a landmark for family carers. After the employment court found two parents who were full-time carers to their adult disabled children to be Ministry of Health employees, an appeal by the attorney-general saw the case advanced to the supreme court. The country’s highest court held that the parents were state employees.

Five months down the line, on May 21, parliament passed the first reading of the Disability Support Services Bill to the House. The bill makes clear that the findings of the supreme and employment courts were a one-off – should the bill pass, it would prevent carers from claiming to be Crown employees.

Wait, it’s a law directly responding to a court case?

Well, that’s what it literally says in the pages of the bill. It “responds to the Supreme Court judgment regarding paid family care in Fleming v Attorney-General” by clarifying “ employment relationships and containing measures to manage Crown fiscal and litigation risks”. It does this by barring any claims of employment status or discrimination by family carers, to ensure “ funding decisions remain with the Crown”, which “does not have unlimited funding and must make choices”.

The New Zealand supreme court

In other words, the supreme court set a costly precedent, and it was in the Crown’s interest to lessen the financial impact.

Huh. That reminds me of something else I was reading about


You don’t say






 Anyway, public submissions are currently open on the bill but close at midday today. The social services and community select committee is expected to report back to the House in a shortened timeframe of four months.

So, what will –

Uh, I’m not finished.

The Disability Support Services Bill comes against a backdrop of other changes being made to the way disability services operate. In February, the government rolled out a standardised Needs Assessment and Service Coordination (NASC) process, which determines which supports a disabled person requires and provides a gateway to services.

The changes were brought about following a 2024-2025 community survey of NASC by the Ministry of Social Development. The survey found that services needed more flexibility to accommodate for the range of experiences had by families, noting “a one-size-fits-all approach for family and carers does not work”. A separate 2025 survey by Carers NZ found that 29.1% of people who used the service felt “let down, angry or scared”.

The Disability Support Services Bill passed its first reading on May 18.

Following that came the reversal of restrictions to the flexible funding purchasing rules in April, rules that had only been introduced in March 2024 . The latest changes allow more, well, flexibility for disabled people and their carers in purchasing the likes of equipment, therapies and overseas travel, but within a fixed budget and with some purchases needing prior approval.

In May, the Lottery Grants Board cut the Individuals with Disabilities fund, which helped disabled people and their families access support workers and other services. The Department of Internal Affairs told The D*List that a new committee structure was being worked on to allow individuals to apply for disability support funding again.

Also in May came Budget 2026 , which featured no new spending for disability services. It did, however, reveal a $1.5m cut to the Ministry of Disabled People over four years, which will be achieved by “optimising aspects of the operating model”, including by using more artificial intelligence.

And in May, The Post reported on the outcome of Kāinga Ora’s decision last year to cut


Read the full article at The Spinoff →
Source document: Ministry of Disabled People's strategy report

1 reports

The SpinoffIndependentCenter9 days ago
The raft of recent disability support changes, explained

The article discusses recent changes to disability support in New Zealand, including housing targets, transport cuts, and restrictions on family carers claiming Crown employment status. It notes that these changes have been controversial and highlights the lack of significant action in the disability issues portfolio prior to recent developments. Minister Louise Upston previously indicated no plans for new disability legislation but later focused on 'practical terms' outlined in the Ministry of Disabled People's strategy report.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a neutral overview of policy changes without overtly favoring one side. It mentions controversy but does not take a stance or use biased language.

Official sources cited

  • government Ministry of Disabled People's strategy report
  • court Supreme Court case

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

  • governmentMinistry of Disabled People's strategy report
  • courtSupreme Court case