ON
← Back to feed
United KingdomCulture3 days ago

Naomi Campbell called unfit to run a charity in her appeal against ban

Naomi Campbell is facing challenges in her appeal against a five-year ban on running a charity, following findings by the Charity Commission that she was 'highly culpable' for mismanagement and misuse of funds at her former charity, Fashion for Relief. The commission stated that Campbell 'completely abdicated' her responsibilities as a trustee and showed an 'absence of the competence' expected of a charity leader. Campbell's lawyers argued she was a victim of fraud and made an honest mistake without personal gain. The charity, which raised significant funds through high-profile events, was ins

Naomi Campbell today told a London tribunal she had been 'deceived' and victim to identity fraud as she fought to overturn her five-year ban from serving as a charity trustee.

The 56-year-old supermodel demanded 'respect' as she appealed against the Charity Commission's decision, imposed after its investigation into her charity - Fashion For Relief - uncovered serious mismanagement of funds.

The watchdog found that charity money had been used to cover expenses including Campbell's stay at a five-star hotel in Cannes, as well as spa treatments, room service and cigarettes.

Campbell was one of three trustees disqualified following the probe. Former trustee Bianka Hellmich received a nine-year ban, while Veronica Chou was disqualified for four years.

But Campbell claims she was herself misled and impersonated during the inquiry, alleging that forged documents and fake email accounts were used without her knowledge.

Arriving at the tribunal on Tuesday, Campbell said in a written statement: 'I am bringing this appeal to shine a light on the deception I believe was waged against the charity, stopping money from going to the causes it was supposed to.

'My investigation has revealed identity fraud and deception and helps uncover why most of the funds weren't used as intended.

'What my legal team has unearthed is shocking, involving fake email addresses and forged communications with the authorities.

Naomi Campbell attended a central London tribunal today to fight against her five-year ban from serving as a charity trustee

The 56-year-old supermodel told the tribunal she had been the victim of deception and identity fraud

She asked for 'respect' as she was cross examined, telling the counsel for the charity watchdog they had both been 'deceived'

'I am pleased the tribunal has given me the chance to speak out, to ensure those responsible are held accountable and justice is done.

'As I have said before, I have never undertaken philanthropic work for personal gain, nor will I ever do so.'

Giving evidence in person, Campbell repeatedly insisted that she had been deceived by those she trusted.

The supermodel said: 'I'm here because I have been deceived, you are here because you have been deceived, so let's both be respectful to each other.'

The remark came during exchanges with Faisel Sadiq, counsel for the Charity Commission, as he cross-examined her about her role in the charity's management.

Campbell said her 'only mistake' had been trusting Hellmich, whom she alleges forged her signature and falsely presented herself as a specialist charity lawyer.

She told the tribunal: 'I did not do a check on Bianka (Hellmich) – when I'm introduced to a lawyer, I assume they are acting within the law.'

Rejecting suggestions that she should have carried out more due diligence, Campbell added: 'I don't look at it as a failure, I look at it as me trusting someone that I knew, someone that was a lawyer.'

Campbell was banned from serving as a charity trustee after the watchdog found charity money had been used to cover expenses including hotel stays, spa treatments, room service and cigarettes

Pressed further on whether she should have done more, she replied: 'I trusted the wrong person, what more do you want?

'You trusted her too because you were in communication with her until we let you know that you were deceived.'

The tribunal has previously heard allegations from Campbell's legal team that Hellmich received hundreds of thousands of pounds from charity funds over a number of years.

Campbell's lawyers argue that Hellmich held herself out as an experienced legal professional and advised the model that she could adopt a limited, figurehead role focused on fundraising while others dealt with regulatory and financial matters.

In written submissions, Andrew Westwood KC, representing Campbell, said Hellmich had carried out 'a long-term and consistent scheme of mismanagement and deception' and concealed it from Campbell and others.

The Charity Commission disputes that argument, maintaining that trustees cannot simply delegate away their legal responsibilities.

Its counsel has argued that it was not legally open to Campbell to 'abdicate' her duties as a trustee, regardless of any reliance placed on advisers.

The hearing marks the latest chapter in a saga that overshadowed what should have been one of the proudest moments of Campbell's career.

Last year, the fashion icon received one of France's highest cultural honours when she was appointed a Knight of the Order of Arts and Letters in Paris, recognising her contribution to the arts after nearly four decades in the industry.

But on the very same day, headlines around the world focused instead on the Charity Commission's findings against Fashion For Relief.

Campbell has since maintained that she believed money raised through the charity was reaching the causes it was intended to support.

The tribunal continues.

Read the full article at Daily Mail
Source document: Charity Commission inquiry report on Fashion for Relief

3 reports

The Guardian (UK)IndependentCenter3 days ago
Naomi Campbell called unfit to run a charity in her appeal against ban

Naomi Campbell is facing challenges in her appeal against a five-year ban on running a charity, following findings by the Charity Commission that she was 'highly culpable' for mismanagement and misuse of funds at her former charity, Fashion for Relief. The commission stated that Campbell 'completely abdicated' her responsibilities as a trustee and showed an 'absence of the competence' expected of a charity leader. Campbell's lawyers argued she was a victim of fraud and made an honest mistake without personal gain. The charity, which raised significant funds through high-profile events, was ins

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the Charity Commission's allegations against Naomi Campbell and her legal team's defense without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both parties and provides factual details about the case without editorializing or using biased language.

Official sources cited

  • government Charity Commission inquiry report on Fashion for Relief
Daily MailIndependentCenter4 days ago
Naomi Campbell asks for 'respect' and tells tribunal she has been 'deceived' as she appeals her charity trustee ban after probe into her Fashion for Relief organisation

Naomi Campbell appeared before a London tribunal to appeal her five-year ban from serving as a charity trustee, imposed by the Charity Commission following an investigation into her organization, Fashion For Relief. The commission found that charity funds were misused for personal expenses such as hotel stays, spa treatments, and other luxury items. Campbell claimed she was deceived and impersonated during the inquiry, alleging the use of forged documents and fake email accounts without her knowledge. She stated her goal was to expose the deception and ensure funds were properly allocated.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Campbell's claims and the findings of the Charity Commission without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from Campbell and references the official findings of the commission, maintaining a balanced tone.

Official sources cited

Sky News (UK)IndependentCenter5 days ago
Naomi Campbell asks for 'respect' at hearing to appeal her charity ban

Naomi Campbell has appeared at a tribunal hearing to challenge a five-year ban preventing her from serving as a charity trustee.

Bias read (Center): The article provides only factual information without any apparent framing or emphasis that suggests a particular ideological perspective. It does not include quotes, opinions, or contextual elements that would indicate a left or right lean.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.