Pay Dirt
June 17, 2026 6:00 AM
Photo illustration by Slate. Photo by Getty Images Plus.
Pay Dirt is Slate’s money advice column. Have a question? Send it to Kristin and Ilyce here . (It’s anonymous!)
Dear Pay Dirt,
This is one of those good problems. Through a combination of good fortune, inheritance, and a long work history (over 40 years and counting), plus a dedication to saving, I’ll be entering retirement soon. I’m actually retiring “early” (before 65), and at some point when it makes sense I’ll have Social Security and pension income in addition to the money my husband and I are already living on (he has a generous annuity). I’ll have sufficient resources to not only maintain my standard of living, but also almost certainly leave my heirs something well into six figures (maybe seven) each.
But I don’t think it makes sense to hang on to it all until I die while my stepson and daughter could certainly use a boost now. I admit I’m a little worried about how they each might handle a sudden windfall at my death. My stepson has a well paying job and robust savings of his own already, but my daughter will have a creative career and has a mild disability that may limit her ability to work a “real job.” What might be some strategies for helping them out? I’ve had my daughter open a Vanguard account to help her learn how to manage long-term savings, but there’s only $1,000 in it and she hasn’t been motivated to figure out how to invest it yet. My stepson is single and roaring along on his FIRE plan. Just looking for some concepts on how we could smooth out the wealth transfer, or whether it makes more sense not to do that.
—Grateful for a Good Problem
Dear Grateful,
You’re in a great position—congratulations!
For starters, consider the taxes. The current rules allow you to give up to $19,000 per recipient per year without triggering a gift tax. (Larger gifts are often still tax-free but may count against your lifetime estate-and-gift-tax exemption .) If you want to help your kids now, you can do that in ways that are structured and intentional. This might be simply writing them a check, or it could be transferring investments. Or it could be paying for specific living expenses.
But the plan can also be more formal. You can start a living trust to give your family some financial support while you still maintain control or guidance. Trusts are often used when a parent wants to protect a child from mismanaging a lump sum or when a child has a disability or unpredictable income. For your daughter, you might think about a structure that supports her without handing over a large lump sum. You can set up your trust for periodic distributions, or allow it to only cover specific categories like housing, education, or medical needs. This is common for families with a child who has a disability or unpredictable income. For your stepson, who’s already financially stable and pursuing FIRE, small annual gifts or occasional support for major milestones might be more than enough. Importantly, because these decisions can have tax and legal implications, it’s worth consulting an estate planning attorney or financial professional to tailor the plan to your situation.
It sounds like you have two goals here, really: to transfer wealth but also to help your kids build wealth. Those might have different solutions. For example, if your daughter has earned income, helping fund a Roth IRA could give her decades of tax-free growth for her retirement. If either child hopes to buy a home someday, helping with a down payment might be more impactful than leaving them a larger inheritance later.
It’s smart to help your daughter open an investment account, because many people don’t learn to manage money until they’re forced to. A small account is a low‑stakes way to build those financial skills. You could pair it with small annual gifts that she invests with your help, which gives her some practice before she ever receives a larger inheritance.
But one of the most valuable things you can do might be to simply be more transparent with them about your plans. Many families avoid conversations about money and inheritance until it’s too late, which can leave the heirs feeling overwhelmed by both the money and the responsibility that comes with it. Gradually involving your kids in your investment decisions can help turn a future windfall into something they’re prepared to manage.
Please keep questions short (<150 words), and don‘t submit the same question to multiple columns. We are unable to edit or remove questions after publication. Use pseudonyms to maintain anonymity. Your submission may be used in other Slate advice columns and may be edited for publication.
Dear Pay Dirt,
My family is close to another family that has been through a lot of bad luck and is not in a great place financially. The family includes a pair of twins who have just graduated high school. They’re headed off to the same college, and we think they will pro…
Read the full article at Slate →📄Source document: Vanguard→9 reports
MarketWatchParty-alignedCenter2 days ago I’m 55 and retiring in 6 years. Should I be switching to Roth 401(k) contributions now?The article discusses whether someone who is 55 and planning to retire in six years should switch to Roth 401(k) contributions. It references a statement from Vanguard indicating that people are still hesitant to participate in Roth plans at work.
Bias read (Center): The article does not present any overtly biased language, framing, or sourcing. It raises a financial question without taking a stance on the issue, and it cites a general observation from Vanguard without attributing it to any particular ideological perspective.
MarketWatchParty-alignedCenter4 days ago Scared to spend your retirement money? Here’s one way to get over the fear of running out.The article discusses the fear of running out of money during retirement and suggests ways to overcome this concern.
Bias read (Center): The article addresses financial planning for retirement without taking a political stance. It focuses on personal finance strategies rather than policy or partisan issues.
SlateIndependentCenter4 days ago My Kids Are Going To Get a Windfall When I Die. Only One of Them Can Handle It.A reader is considering how to distribute their wealth to their adult children before passing away, taking into account their different financial situations. The reader is concerned about whether their stepson, who already has a stable job and savings, would responsibly handle a large sum, versus their daughter, who has a creative career and a mild disability that may affect her ability to work traditional jobs. The reader has already helped their daughter start managing money through a Vanguard account.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses personal financial planning and estate distribution without taking a stance on political issues. It presents a neutral scenario regarding family financial management and does not exhibit any ideological framing or bias.
MarketWatchParty-alignedCenter5 days ago Want to splurge on travel in retirement? Here’s how to plan for it.The article discusses planning for travel expenses during retirement, advising against delaying large trips and emphasizing the importance of early planning.
Bias read (Center): The article provides general financial advice on retirement travel planning without taking a stance on political issues. It does not reference any political entities, policies, or ideological perspectives.
MarketWatchParty-alignedCenter5 days ago ‘I’m a realist’: I’m 50 with $6.5 million saved. Should I quit my $200,000 job and retire early?A 50-year-old individual with $6.5 million saved is contemplating quitting their $200,000 job to retire early and focus on trading activities full-time.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a personal financial decision without taking a stance or showing bias toward any political ideology. It focuses on an individual’s choice regarding retirement and trading, which is not inherently politically charged.
MarketWatchParty-alignedCenter8 days ago I’m 55 and earn $100,000. Should I take a $2,900 monthly pension — or $2,200 with 3% annual hikes?A 55-year-old individual earning $100,000 annually is considering whether to accept a $2,900 monthly pension or a $2,200 pension with a 3% annual increase.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a financial decision without taking a stance on either option. It does not include any biased language, framing, or sourcing that would indicate a particular ideological leaning.
MarketWatchParty-alignedCenter11 days ago Fund a grandchild’s retirement tax-free from birth — if you can trust an 18-year-old with the moneyA new financial account allows grandparents to fund a grandchild's retirement tax-free from birth, bypassing standard Roth IRA rules, though the beneficiary gains control of the money at age 18.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a financial product with balanced consideration of both tax benefits and the control-at-18 drawback, using neutral language throughout.
CBS News (US)IndependentCenter12 days ago Here's the retirement challenge nobody talks aboutA CBS News article discusses the growing issue of 'decumulation'—how retirees manage their savings after retirement. It highlights that only 31% of Americans understand the concept, and just 29% of those aged 55 and older have a plan for spending down their retirement funds. The piece cites research from Corebridge Financial and the Employee Benefit Research Institute, noting that many retirees underspend due to fears of running out of money.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data and quotes experts without taking a stance on policy or ideology. It focuses on financial planning challenges faced by retirees and does not frame the information in a politically biased manner.
Official sources cited
- organisation Corebridge Financial
- organisation Employee Benefit Research Institute
USA TodayParty-alignedCenter13 days ago Maybe we don't all need $1 million to retire, after allThe article discusses the idea that having $1 million saved might not be necessary for everyone to achieve a comfortable retirement.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a general financial concept without taking a stance on political issues. It does not favor any particular ideology or policy and focuses on personal finance rather than political debate.