Microsoft’s Clean Energy Reversal Collides with Virginia’s Climate Goals

One of the world’s most profitable technology companies could be abandoning an ambitious clean-energy goal in Virginia as it races to build electricity-hungry data centers. Several of the company’s facilities are already operating in Virginia, the data center capital of the world , and more are planned, creating a tension with the state’s own climate commitments.

Microsoft is considering ending its round-the-clock or 24/7 clean energy goal, which aims to meet 100 percent of its energy consumption 100 percent of the time with zero-carbon electricity by 2030.

“It’s always easier to work in partnership than it is to work against them if our goals are aligned,” said Tim Cywinski, communications director for the Virginia chapter of the Sierra Club. “Our goals should be aligned. This is Microsoft telling us that they aren’t.”

In Virginia, Microsoft has a hub of data centers for its Azure cloud services in Mecklenburg County. There, in rural Southside Virginia, there are more than 20 different data center buildings, according to datacentermap.com .

The company also has several data centers in Northern Virginia across Loudoun County near Dulles International Airport; Prince William County and Fairfax County. More data centers are planned for Mecklenburg and Prince William counties, which would more than triple the company’s statewide employee count to 2,042 by the end of the year.

Amazon has the largest data center footprint in the state, Cywinski said, followed by Microsoft and Google, which is also expanding. Meta has a data center outside Richmond.

Microsoft’s retreat is happening at the same time as the Trump administration’s attack on clean energy development and investment. Despite the consequences of rising climate change devastation and recovery costs, the company and its counterparts—Amazon, Google and Meta—are planning to power their computer warehouses with fossil-fuel plants .

In 2024, Virginia had 81 million metric tons of carbon emissions, according to Rhodium Group’s Climate Deck. That’s down from the 85 metric tons the state emitted in 2020, when it passed the Virginia Clean Economy Act (VCEA). The law was designed to decarbonize the state’s grid by mid-century, but that goal is now in question.

Rather than imposing a carbon budget, the law incentivizes Virginia’s two largest utilities to use renewable energy and retire fossil fuel sources in the state to reduce emissions. But utilities can ask regulators to build new fossil plants, or keep existing ones online, if there is a threat of running short on power.

By 2030, the state is projected to rank 30th nationally in power-generation-related emissions with about 57 million metric tons of carbon emissions. Separate research in Environmental Letters found that data center demand could contribute to a 28 percent increase in power sector carbon emissions, compared to no data center demand. That would be partly due to “coal-fired generation rebounds to meet demand in Northern Virginia,” the study found.

Data center growth in Virginia has created tension over the state’s pursuit of the goals in the VCEA, with Republicans advocating to abandon the law. Even if no constraints were holding up data center development, like needing transmission lines to deliver power, Virginia’s Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission found in 2024 that it “will be very difficult, with or without meeting VCEA requirements” to meet the demand projected. During her campaign, now Lt. Governor Ghazala Hashmi, a member of the Democratic Party that has trifecta control of state government, indicated that data center development conflicts with the VCEA.

“The single greatest threat to our clean energy goals is not the lack of resolve or purpose or goals, but rather it is the sheer speed and the size of what is coming at us, explicitly…the growing demands within our commonwealth for energy,” Hashmi said at a Virginia Clean Energy Summit last fall.

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Donate Now

Leading up to and following Microsoft’s 2020 climate commitment, the company made deals for various amounts of solar and energy storage technologies in Virginia and PJM, the regional grid operator for Virginia, 12 other states and the District of Columbia. When announcing its commitment, Microsoft concurred with the scientific community’s conclusion that emissions needed to decrease to reverse the harm caused by climate change.

“Already, the planet’s temperature has risen by 1 degree centigrade,” read a post from Brad Smith, president and vice-chair. “If we don’t curb emissions, and temperatures continue to climb, science tells us that the results will be catastrophic.” In unveiling “a new plan to reduce and ultimately remove Microsoft’s carbon footprint,” the company acknowle…