ON
← Back to feed
WorldSports5 days ago

Is the World Cup Ruined? We Already Have Our Answer.

The article discusses the first World Cup hosted in North America in three decades, highlighting issues such as high ticket prices, concerns over the expanded group phase format, and problems with visa denials. However, it concludes that despite these challenges, the event has created a positive atmosphere, bringing people together to celebrate their shared love for soccer.

Sports

By

Jeremy Stahl

Enter your email to receive alerts for this author.

Sign in or create an account to better manage your email preferences.

Unsubscribe from email alerts

Are you sure you want to unsubscribe from email alerts for Jeremy Stahl ?

June 15, 2026 2:50 PM

Cabo Verde fans at the match between Spain and Cabo Verde in Atlanta on Monday.

Florencia Tan Jun/Getty Images

Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.

Coming out of the opening weekend of the first World Cup hosted in North America in three decades, two things are clear: With FIFA’s backing, the U.S. government did everything it could to try to screw up this World Cup—and it failed. Despite all of the ticket-price gouging , questions about meaningless group phase games in a deeply expanded format , hydration stops that double as antithetical midmatch commercial breaks , and abominable visa denials of key figures by inhospitable American hosts, the vibes are still, somehow, very good .

In spite of ourselves, this World Cup is already doing the one, beautiful thing that the World Cup always manages to do: bring people from every corner of the planet to the same place to share the best possible version of one thing we all deeply love, creating a series of moments that soccer fans will, all of us, always share together.

Cards on the table: I have had a long knack for missing those Big World Cup Moments.

I have been writing about the World Cup for 16 years but have never attended a match. That now includes the United States’ epic 4–1 win over Paraguay in Friday’s home opener, which I had planned to attend—and ultimately missed.

Again, this is not unusual for me. My first World Cup memories are of soccer-obsessed uncles being flabbergasted when Roberto Baggio, the best player on maybe the best team in the world, missed the decisive penalty that cost Italy that trophy to Brazil. That was the most recent time America had hosted a World Cup, and I didn’t watch a single game, not even that epic final.

I only really started to pay attention to the World Cup after working in Paris in 2006 for a sports television network and watching as Zinedine Zidane was sent off for the incomprehensible headbutt heard ’round the world. As a soccer novice, though, I was still missing things, not clocking why everyone around me was so horror-struck—Les Bleues could still win on penalties, right? (Spoiler: They lost to Italy on penalties.) I can still see the smoke wafting off the Arc de Triomphe from premature fireworks and flares that had been lit in the roadway—a ghostly premonition of a trophy that never was.

By 2010, I was actually a legitimate fan, watching with glee as the vuvuzelas blasted halfway across the world. I was also in soccer-mad England during the tournament for a friend’s wedding, the perfect opportunity to celebrate the World Cup. However, instead of watching the greatest moment in U.S. men’s national team history—Landon Donovan’s 91 st -minute miracle goal to secure the top spot in their group and a place in the World Cup knockout round—I was watching the turgid English 1–0 victory over Slovenia in a Chuck E. Cheese–style back room of a small-town pub . Viral replays were not yet a thing, so it was days before I finally saw Tim Howard’s desperate heave somehow spark a succession of lightning passes and one final lucky ricochet to the right person in the right spot to achieve group-stage glory for USMNT.

I have been a pretty faithful viewer in the years since, yet still somehow managed to miss some huge moments (France’s 4–3 Round of 16 win over Argentina in 2018, England’s quarterfinal victory over Sweden that same year, and much of Morocco’s glorious 2022 run).

That brings us to this past weekend. I have been anticipating this World Cup for years. Although the astronomical ticket prices and abhorrent FIFA purchase process made it so that I couldn’t get tickets in the initial phases, I ultimately got a press ticket to the U.S. opener against Paraguay in my home city of Los Angeles. It was going to be my first-ever World Cup match.

I was getting ready to head to the stadium Friday morning when one of the only things that could have possibly forced me to miss that match happened—my 3-year-old was hospitalized. He’s doing much better and back home safe, which is why I’m comfortable writing all of this. The friend who held that 2010 World Cup wedding I mentioned earlier, though, summed up how any World Cup fan parent would surely feel: “Glad he’s OK. But I would definitely hold it against him.”

Honestly, all that matters is my son’s health. Also, though: I had been looking forward to this match, this moment, for years.

Goal after goal , celebrity cutaway after celebrity cutaway , that U.S. opener was truly magical—but just last week, that magic had felt uncertain.

One of the biggest soccer fans I know was talking of a boycott after witnessing attor…

Read the full article at Slate

1 reports

SlateIndependentCenter5 days ago
Is the World Cup Ruined? We Already Have Our Answer.

The article discusses the first World Cup hosted in North America in three decades, highlighting issues such as high ticket prices, concerns over the expanded group phase format, and problems with visa denials. However, it concludes that despite these challenges, the event has created a positive atmosphere, bringing people together to celebrate their shared love for soccer.

Bias read (Center): The article does not take a political stance but rather comments on logistical and organizational aspects of the World Cup. It acknowledges criticisms while also noting the positive communal experience, without favoring any particular political viewpoint.