ON
← Back to feed
AustraliaCulture2 days ago

Hanson says one of Australia’s biggest ideas has 'failed'. The reality is more complex

Pauline Hanson, leader of the One Nation party, advocated for a monocultural Australia during a speech at the National Press Club, stating that Australia should have a single cultural identity. This stance contrasts with the views of most Australians, who support multiculturalism, as indicated by a survey showing 75% of respondents believe it benefits society. Both major political parties, Labor and the Coalition, do not oppose multiculturalism, though they have had recent disagreements over migration policies. Opposition Leader Angus Taylor criticized Hanson for wanting to judge people based

June 19, 2026 — 8:00pm

Photo: Megan Herbert To submit a letter to The Age , email letters@theage.com.au . Please include your home address and telephone number. No attachments, please include your letter in the body of the email. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published.

I was contemplating Pauline Hanson’s need for a monoculture, while I viewed with wonder the “cultural quilt” displayed at Cabrini Hospital, comprising dozens of colourful separate patchwork symbols and the written commentary commemorating the myriad nationalities that comprised the Cabrini “family.” Then I thought to myself, “If we follow her path, we’ll be harking back to the days of “meat, two veg and dollops of tomato sauce”. Peter Russo, Brunswick West

Accepting change takes time Your correspondent (Letters, 18/6), has a much better sense of reality than Pauline Hanson does. As a son of a 1949 refugee family, I recall the then parochial and anti so-called ″⁣New Australian″⁣ attitudes of many Australians. Hearing comments like ″⁣why don’t you speak Australian or go back to your own country″⁣, was not unusual. Thank goodness Australia has matured, no doubt in part because of our acceptance of multiculturalism. My parents were grateful for the opportunity to establish a new family life in a new country and worked hard to be accepted in their new homeland, but did not reject their own cultural background. I would like to think they added to Australian culture and values in many ways. We can all learn from the range of cultures we are exposed to without sacrificing the core values which bring cohesion to societies. Cultures change slowly, but do so over time. A purely Australian culture (as distinct from characteristics), is hard to define and in any case is not static, but perhaps universal values which support the creation and maintenance of a cohesive and caring community is a better place to focus our attention. For most of us, accepting change takes time, but to all those One Nation supporters, do you really want to take us back to the ’40s and ’50s? Charles Griss, Balwyn

Australia’s values are fracturing It is laughable listening to all the faux outrage at Pauline Hanson’s reference to maintaining an Australian ″⁣monoculture″⁣. I would urge all voters to listen to her whole address instead of taking notice of “edited” bits of the speech written without context. Surely people of common sense would understand that her reference to monoculture meant what so many people are now wanting with a louder and louder voice. Australia needs to be a country of unity and shared common Western values – values that have underpinned this country’s history and which have been so attractive to the many people who have migrated here for those very reasons. Australia is undergoing is a fracturing of those values and we are seeing the results of this fracturing in that we have a royal commission on antisemitism and social cohesion. If our shared values are not fracturing there would be no need for a such a commission. Jan White, Donvale

THE FORUM

Hanson, pay us a visit Each March, in our small Victorian town, we celebrate ″⁣Harmony Day″⁣, as do other towns and cities around the country. Our schools celebrate in their classrooms, and large crowds come to our main street to see our many local cultures celebrated for what they are – a rich tapestry of traditional songs, languages, dances, stories, clothing and cooking that have evolved from their many homelands. Afghan, Indian, Sri Lankan, Philippine, Thai, Japanese, Irish, Korean, Chinese, Sudanese Australians and other first and second-generation immigrants and refugees are cheered for what they are – the people of our planet who have landed for various reasons on a foreign shore, as indeed did all our forebears. Indigenous dancers honour their ancient rituals in their own land, and invite us to join in. Our community would welcome the leaders of the party that advocates a ″⁣monocultural″⁣ society to come along next Harmony Day. Let’s sit down together and listen, and talk. William Twycross, Mansfield

A beautiful picture Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, for your front page picture of those four beautiful young Australian Socceroos stars (19/6). Surely these boys, and their wonderful migrant colleagues in this country, will overcome the One Nation ugliness once and for all. Nick Bailey, Northcote

Forced removal Monoculture? We’ve tried that before. One of the consequences of it was it made it seem right and proper to remove children from their parents. And, of course, there was the donations of blankets. That was OK at the time, too. Ian Brain, Ballarat

Policy negatives Columnist Jenna Price is right to call out Pauline Hanson for her attitude to the perceived inequities of the Family Court’s allocation of access and responsibility (“ Family Court would be a disaster if Hanson had her way ”, 18/6). Suicide is a tragedy, not a political football: Hanson is way out of court in claiming…

Read the full article at The Age
Source document: Pauline Hanson's speech at the National Press Club

6 reports

The AgeParty-alignedCenter2 days ago
A quilt is a singular example of our united families

The article features two reader letters discussing multiculturalism in Australia. One letter criticizes Pauline Hanson's views on monoculture, using the metaphor of a 'cultural quilt' from Cabrini Hospital to represent diversity. Another letter reflects on the evolution of Australian attitudes toward multiculturalism, referencing the experiences of a refugee family.

Bias read (Center): The article presents two perspectives on multiculturalism without overtly favoring one over the other. It includes personal reflections and historical context, offering a balanced view of cultural integration in Australia.

The AgeParty-alignedLeft3 days ago
Going backwards is not a path to the future

The article critiques Pauline Hanson's speech at the National Press Club, where she advocates for reducing migration and returning to a monocultural society reminiscent of the 1940s. The piece highlights the economic and cultural benefits of post-WWII migration and warns of potential labor shortages if migration were restricted. It also criticizes Hanson's stance on Indigenous Australians, suggesting her policies would negatively impact First Nations communities.

Bias read (Left): The article presents a clear critique of Pauline Hanson's views on multiculturalism and Indigenous policy, emphasizing the negative consequences of her proposed policies. The tone is dismissive of Hanson's arguments and highlights the benefits of current multicultural policies, indicating a leftward

Official sources cited

SBS NewsState / PublicCenter3 days ago
Hanson says one of Australia’s biggest ideas has 'failed'. The reality is more complex

Pauline Hanson, leader of the One Nation party, advocated for a monocultural Australia during a speech at the National Press Club, stating that Australia should have a single cultural identity. This stance contrasts with the views of most Australians, who support multiculturalism, as indicated by a survey showing 75% of respondents believe it benefits society. Both major political parties, Labor and the Coalition, do not oppose multiculturalism, though they have had recent disagreements over migration policies. Opposition Leader Angus Taylor criticized Hanson for wanting to judge people based

Bias read (Center): The article presents Pauline Hanson's position alongside responses from opposition figures and public opinion data, offering a balanced perspective without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct quotes from Hanson and counterpoints from political opponents, suggesting neutrality in framing.

Official sources cited

ABC News (Australia)State / PublicCenter3 days ago
Live: Nationals senator concerned Hanson wants to 'pick and choose' journalists

Nationals frontbencher Bridget McKenzie expressed concern over Pauline Hanson's potential desire to selectively engage with journalists, following Hanson's criticism of a Guardian Australia reporter during her National Press Club address. Separately, Nationals frontbencher Kevin Hogan commented on Pauline Hanson's call to end multiculturalism, noting that One Nation may be capitalizing on public sentiment regarding migration issues after the Bondi terror attack.

Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from both Bridget McKenzie and Kevin Hogan without overtly favoring one perspective over another. It reports on concerns raised by Nationals senators regarding Pauline Hanson's approach to media engagement and her views on multiculturalism, while also including Hogan'

Official sources cited

  • government Nationals frontbencher Bridget McKenzie's comments
  • government Nationals frontbencher Kevin Hogan's comments
The AgeParty-alignedLeft3 days ago
Think the Family Court is a disaster now? Hanson would make it worse

The article critiques Pauline Hanson's views on family issues, including her stance on abortion, childcare, and the Family Court system. It argues that her policies would increase stress and family separation, and questions her credibility regarding women's experiences. The author suggests that Hanson's personal experiences, particularly related to her son's legal troubles, have influenced her hardening stance on the Family Court.

Bias read (Left): The article presents a critical perspective toward Pauline Hanson's policies, using language such as 'angry and predictable rant,' 'more stress and pain among our families,' and questioning her belief in women's experiences. The framing emphasizes negative consequences of her proposed changes to the

The Sydney Morning HeraldParty-alignedLeft3 days ago
Think the Family Court is a disaster now? Hanson would make it worse

The article critiques Pauline Hanson's views on family issues, including her stance on abortion, childcare, and multiculturalism. It argues that her policies would increase stress and family separation, particularly criticizing her approach to the Family Court system. The author suggests that Hanson's personal experiences, including her son's legal troubles, have influenced her hardening stance on family law.

Bias read (Left): The article presents a critical perspective toward Pauline Hanson's policies, using strong language such as 'angry and predictable rant,' 'more stress and pain among our families,' and 'does not believe women.' These phrases indicate a clear ideological critique aligned with progressive values, thus

Official sources cited

  • statement Pauline Hanson's speech at the National Press Club
  • statement Senate statement by Pauline Hanson

Go to the primary sources (8)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.