ON
← Back to feed
United KingdomCrime13 days ago

First precise genome editing of human embryos triggers praise and alarm

Researchers have used a precise genome-editing technique called base editing to alter the genome of human embryos. This development has sparked both excitement and concern among scientists and bioethicists. While some view it as a significant advancement toward correcting disease-causing mutations in embryos, others warn of potential misuse, such as attempting to enhance traits like intelligence. The study, conducted by Dieter Egli and colleagues, was published on the preprint server bioRxiv and has not yet undergone peer review.

NATURE BRIEFING

08 June 2026

The use of ‘base editing’ to precisely tweak human embryos has divided researchers. Plus, the number of lives saved by less-polluting cars in China and how to tip the world towards a sustainable future.

By

Flora Graham

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Hello Nature readers, would you like to get this Briefing in your inbox free every day? Sign up here .

Human embryos altered using base editing

Researchers say they have used a precise genome-editing technique called base editing to alter the genome of human embryos — prompting praise and censure from scientists. Some say the new work is an impressive step towards being able to fix disease-causing mutations in embryos. Others worry the technology could be used to create ‘designer babies’. But it’s premature and risky to attempt this, says developmental cell biologist Dieter Egli, who co-authored the new study, because base editing can damage embryos. In its current form, “you can’t use it. It’s as clear as day and night,” he says.

Nature | 7 min read

Reference: bioRxiv preprint (not peer reviewed)

Police expel scientists from US conference

Several diabetes experts were thrown out of the annual meeting of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) as they handed out copies of an editorial critical of the Trump administration’s science policies. Among them were the editor in chief of the organization's flagship journal, which published the editorial, and other physicians and researchers. “They physically grabbed us, forced us out of the conference center, and now are telling us we can no longer attend this meeting,” said Aaron Kelly, a professor of paediatrics. “It really has come to this in America.” The ADA said in a statement that it is obliged to “maintain a strictly nonpartisan environment”.

MedPage Today | 6 min read

Reference: Diabetes Care editorial

262,000

The estimated number of premature deaths prevented by the change from gas-guzzlers to electric cars across 150 cities in China from 2019 to 2023. ( Nature | 5 min read )

Reference: Nature Health paper

Stonehenge ‘altar’ carried on glacier

A massive slab at the centre of Stonehenge somehow travelled 700 kilometres from its origin in northeast Scotland to its current home in the south of England. A model of Neolithic ice flows suggests a glacier might have carried the six-tonne monolith as far as Doggerland — an area that is now beneath the North Sea. Then, roughly 3,000 years before it came to Stonehenge, people might have saved the rock from rising sea levels. “What is exciting about these findings is that they could imply that the people of Doggerland attached cultural significance to the Altar Stone long before it was incorporated into Stonehenge,” says glaciologist and study co-author Remy Veness.

BBC Science Focus | 4 min read

Reference: Journal of Quaternary Science paper

Why cancer is rising in young people

Around the world, multiple types of cancer are climbing rapidly in people under the age of 50, leaving researchers scrambling to find what’s driving them. There’s no smoking gun, but suspects abound: ultra-processed foods, obesity, microbial toxins and agricultural chemicals were all in researchers’ line-up at two influential cancer meetings this year. But rising cancer incidence “does not tell a single story”, says epidemiologist Hyuna Sung. It’s important to investigate the rise of specific cancer types, rather than cases as a whole, to avoid muddying the evidence.

Nature | 8 min read

Features & opinion

AI is taking on antibiotic resistance

Antibiotics are an effective, but somewhat indiscriminate solution to some gut infections. Helpful species of gut bacteria get caught in the crossfire, which increases the likelihood that drug-resistant bacterial strains will evolve. Researchers are now designing drugs to selectively target disease-causing species with the help of artificial intelligence . Some teams are using AI to screen drug molecules for the most promising candidates quickly and cheaply. Others have developed tools that predict how drug molecules bind to protein targets to reveal a drug’s mechanism of action, reducing the need for wet-lab experiments.

Nature | 15 min read

Decline and fall — or renaissance?

In Tipping Out of Trouble , complex-systems researcher Marten Scheffer explores the ‘tipping points’ that led to societal transformations throughout history and what we can learn from them to build a sustainable future . “Humanity has tipped out of trouble many times before,” he writes, but doing so now requires a “fundamental shift of scale” in efforts to tackle climate change and nature loss. Scheffer highlights “the complexity of societal change”, writes geographer David Armstrong McKay in his review, and “how it often takes people by surprise but can have positive outcomes”.

Nature | 11 min read

Merton showed ‘what science should be’

As the scientific enterprise in the United States is buffeted by political storms, soci…

Read the full article at Nature News
Source document: bioRxiv preprint (not peer reviewed)

2 reports

Nature NewsParty-alignedCenter13 days ago
Daily briefing: Human embryo genomes precisely altered

Researchers have used base editing to alter human embryos, sparking debate among scientists. While some view this as progress toward correcting genetic diseases, others warn of potential risks and ethical concerns regarding 'designer babies.' Developmental cell biologist Dieter Egli cautions against using the technology in its current state due to possible embryo damage. The article also mentions scientists being expelled from a conference for distributing criticism of U.S. science policies.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives on the scientific advancements and ethical concerns without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct quotes from researchers expressing caution and optimism, maintaining a balanced tone.

Official sources cited

  • study bioRxiv preprint (not peer reviewed)
Nature NewsParty-alignedCenter16 days ago
First precise genome editing of human embryos triggers praise and alarm

Researchers have used a precise genome-editing technique called base editing to alter the genome of human embryos. This development has sparked both excitement and concern among scientists and bioethicists. While some view it as a significant advancement toward correcting disease-causing mutations in embryos, others warn of potential misuse, such as attempting to enhance traits like intelligence. The study, conducted by Dieter Egli and colleagues, was published on the preprint server bioRxiv and has not yet undergone peer review.

Bias read (Center): The article presents scientific findings and reactions from multiple experts without overtly favoring any particular viewpoint. It includes both cautious optimism and concerns about potential misuse, reflecting balanced perspectives from the scientific community.

Official sources cited

  • study Dieter Egli, Columbia University
  • study Emre Seli, Yale University

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

  • studybioRxiv preprint (not peer reviewed)
  • studyDieter Egli, Columbia University
  • studyEmre Seli, Yale University