ON
← Back to feed
United StatesCultureOverlooked from the left12 days ago

DOJ Launches Investigation into Philly Police Over 'Arbitrary' Permit-to-Carry Cancellations

The Department of Justice, under President Trump's administration, has initiated an investigation into the Philadelphia Police Department regarding their practice of revoking concealed carry permits based on what the DOJ describes as 'vague, personal discretion.' The investigation focuses on whether the police are using an unclear 'good cause' standard to cancel permits, potentially violating the Second Amendment. The DOJ cited the Supreme Court cases District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and a 2022 ruling affirming the right of law-abiding citizens to bear arms.

Kyle Mazza/Anadolu via Getty Images

On June 9, 2026, President Trump’s Department of Justice launched an investigation into Philadelphia Police over the possible reliance upon “vague, personal discretion” in cancelling some permits for concealed carry.

Harmeet Dhillon, the Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, observed , “ The police can’t revoke a concealed carry permit based on arbitrary decisions of licensing officials. Today, I directed [the Civil Rights Division’s]  2A Section to investigate the Philadelphia Police Department’s practice of revoking the CCWs of those lawfully carrying firearms in public.”

The DOJ subsequently  posted an announcement which said, in part, “Today, the Justice Department opened an investigation to determine whether Philadelphia Police use a vague ‘good cause’ standard to cancel permits to carry legal firearms.”

Further into the announcement, the DOJ noted:

It is a violation of the Second Amendment for government officials to use vague, personal discretion when determining whether to issue or revoke permits to carry firearms. In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court, in its landmark decision  District of Columbia  v.  Heller , held that the Second Amendment protects the right of law-abiding citizens to possess weapons that are in common use for lawful purposes. In 2022, the Supreme Court held, in another case, that permitting officials may not base licensing decisions merely on their personal discretion. Here, it is alleged that Philadelphia Police use just such a discretionary standard to improperly limit Second Amendment rights.

The DOJ sent a letter, dated June 9, 2026, to Philadelphia Mayor Cherelle Parker (D), copied to Philadelphia Police Commissioner Kevin J. Bethel, informing them that the investigation is underway.

AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and the writer/curator of  Down Range with AWR Hawkins ,  a weekly newsletter focused o n al l things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio and the director of global marketing for Lone Star Hunts. He holds a PhD in Military History with a focus on the Vietnam War (brown water navy), U.S. Navy since Inception, the Civil War, and Early Modern Europe. He enjoys reading Philosophy and novels by Jack Carr and Nelson DeMille. He is a lever action man in an AR-15 world. Follow him on X:  @awrhawkins . You can sign up to get Down Range at  breitbart.com/downrange . Reach him directly at  awrhawkins@breitbart.com .

Read the full article at Breitbart News
Source document: Department of Justice Announcement

1 reports

Breitbart NewsIndependentRight12 days ago
DOJ Launches Investigation into Philly Police Over 'Arbitrary' Permit-to-Carry Cancellations

The Department of Justice, under President Trump's administration, has initiated an investigation into the Philadelphia Police Department regarding their practice of revoking concealed carry permits based on what the DOJ describes as 'vague, personal discretion.' The investigation focuses on whether the police are using an unclear 'good cause' standard to cancel permits, potentially violating the Second Amendment. The DOJ cited the Supreme Court cases District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and a 2022 ruling affirming the right of law-abiding citizens to bear arms.

Bias read (Right): The article frames the DOJ's actions as a defense of Second Amendment rights, emphasizing the potential violation of constitutional protections by local authorities. It uses terms like 'arbitrary,' 'vague, personal discretion,' and highlights the DOJ's focus on protecting gun rights, aligning with a

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.