ON
← Back to feed
IrelandMedicine4 days ago

Chants of ‘send them back’ and 'shame on you' as MEPs back contentious migrant detention laws

The European Parliament is set to approve stricter migration rules allowing member states to detain irregular arrivals and establish deportation centers outside the EU. This decision has caused a rift within Irish government-aligned MEPs, with Fine Gael's Regina Doherty supporting the move as 'fair but firm' and Fianna Fáil's Barry Andrews criticizing it as akin to ICE-style policies that risk detaining unaccompanied minors in countries with poor human rights records.

Regina Doherty and Barry Andrews are on opposing sides of the issue. RollingNews.ie

Migration and Asylum Pact

Today’s vote will allow for the creation of deportation centres outside the bloc.

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT is set to give final approval on Wednesday to stricter migration rules that will grant member states broader powers to detain irregular arrivals and allow for the creation of deportation centres outside the bloc.

The vote in Strasbourg is one of the last hurdles for a reform that has arisen following political pressure on Brussels and member states to curb migration.

The plans have also been seen a division open up between Irish government supporting MEPs in Strasbourg.

This is because the new text allows countries to open “return hubs” outside the EU’s borders, where migrants with no right to stay could be sent, among the core concerns.

Fine Gael’s Regina Doherty said the moves will mean a “very fair but firm system”, while Fianna Fáil’s Barry Andrews slammed the measures as “ICE-style” measures that could see unaccompanied children detained and monitored in countries with poor human rights records.

Protests last November outside a centre built to hold people seeking asylum in Albania, on behalf of Italy, but which has mainly lain empty since due to legal challenges. Alamy Stock Photo

Alamy Stock Photo

Doherty has confirmed on Wednesday that she will vote in favour of the EU Returns Regulation when it comes before the European Parliament today.

Speaking on Morning Ireland on RTÉ Radio One, Doherty said it was about creating a “very fair but firm system” that she said would protect the people that need protection, but also “ensure that the legal process is respected” by asylum applicants.

The Dublin MEP said this would be done by creating one set of uniform rules that all member states are signed up to, adding that “we can’t have what we had in the past, of one person leaving one country and going to another European country and starting all over again”.

On the same programme, Andrews questioned whether the policy will result in human rights abuses, while also piling on the pressure on EU budgets.

He said:

I ask myself, will this actually be a deterrent? Will it be value for money for EU taxpayers, and will it meet our own minimum human rights standards? On each of these questions it’s pointing me towards voting against this.

He further argued that there is little supporting evidence of where similar efforts made by the UK and Australia to detain people in third countries actually worked, as he criticised today’s vote due to it being likely to be passed by “a far-right majority” in the parliament.

Fianna Fáil is a member of the liberal centrist Renew group in Strasbourg, while Fine Gael is a member of the ruling centre-right European People’s Party. The latter has been criticised over recent years for increasingly cutting deals with far-right politicians in parliament on issues such as migration.

Andrews further argued deportation numbers may be “underestimated because people are leaving voluntarily”, or are subject to multiple deportation notices.

In response to the accusations of potential human rights abuses in some third countries that will detain asylum seekers under the rules, Doherty accused Andrews of “misinformation” and said that an ICE-style arrangement is “not how we do business in the EU”.

Asked what countries may be involved in holding asylum seekers on behalf of EU members, Doherty said we are not yet at that stage.

“All the regulation does today is give legal provisions for people to engage with third countries if they so wish,” she said.

The Fine Gael MEP added that she believed “very few counties” will pursue the third country policy and that it will only come up where “there is no further option”.

Several EU countries explore return hub option

Human rights groups have strongly criticised the measure but Denmark, Austria, Greece, Germany, the Netherlands and others have already been exploring options to set up hubs.

Until recently a fringe idea, the plan got further endorsement on Tuesday, when a majority of EU nations agreed to seek to secure EU money to run such centres in a move opposed by France and Spain.

With migrant arrivals down in 2025, the focus in Brussels has turned to improving the repatriation system, which currently sees less than 30% of people ordered to leave actually returned to their country of origin.

“This regulation tells everybody that it is us and not the smugglers deciding who can stay in the European Union and who must leave,” said Magnus Brunner, the EU’s commissioner for migration.

Besides return hubs, the new measures establish a strict obligation for migrants subject to expulsion to leave and cooperate with authorities to that end.

Those who do not, or who pose a security risk or are thought to be at risk of absconding, can be detained for up to two years.

Under the new rules authorities would be allowed to search thi…

Read the full article at TheJournal.ie
Source document: Migration and Asylum Pact

2 reports

TheJournal.ieIndependentCenter4 days ago
Chants of ‘send them back’ and 'shame on you' as MEPs back contentious migrant detention laws

The European Parliament is set to approve stricter migration rules allowing member states to detain irregular arrivals and establish deportation centers outside the EU. This decision has caused a rift within Irish government-aligned MEPs, with Fine Gael's Regina Doherty supporting the move as 'fair but firm' and Fianna Fáil's Barry Andrews criticizing it as akin to ICE-style policies that risk detaining unaccompanied minors in countries with poor human rights records.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct quotes from both Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil representatives, highlighting their differing views on the proposed migration policy. There is no evident editorializing or biased language that would indicate a sl

Official sources cited

RTÉ NewsState / PublicLeft4 days ago
Criticism as Israel extends detention of Gaza doctor

Israel's Supreme Court denied the release of Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya, a Gaza doctor detained without charge since December 2024. The court cited 'confidential materials' in its decision, which were not disclosed to Dr. Abu Safiya or his lawyer. Human rights advocates and medical professionals have criticized the ruling as a 'moral and legal failure.' Dr. Abu Safiya is one of at least 14 doctors and many other medical staff from Gaza detained by Israel without charge.

Bias read (Left): The article uses strong condemnatory language such as 'profound moral and legal failure,' 'shameful,' and 'dehumanising' to describe Israel's actions. It highlights criticism from human rights groups and medical professionals, focusing on the ethical implications of detaining a doctor without charge

Official sources cited

  • government Israel's Supreme Court
  • press release Reuters

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.