Ice agents tackled a man at Las Vegas airport, sparking public outrage and calls for accountability, according to video footage and statements from officials. The incident took place at Harry Reid International Airport on Monday, when two plainclothes ICE agents attempted to detain an elderly man who had overstayed his visa. The man, identified as Phu Nguyen, a 57-year-old Australian citizen, was left handcuffed on the ground after the agents fled when they realized they were being recorded. The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police later confirmed the individuals were ICE agents and found no outstanding warrants against Nguyen. They removed his handcuffs and informed ICE, who eventually arrested him at his departure flight from Los Angeles International Airport on Tuesday. The video, widely shared on social media, captured the tense moment as the man yelled and cried while being restrained. Elected officials and advocacy groups condemned the incident, citing concerns over the treatment of non-citizens and the broader implications of increased ICE presence at airports. Democratic U.S. Senator Jacky Rosen of Nevada criticized ICE for acting with impunity, stating that such actions instill fear in communities and harm the tourism economy. The Nevada Latino Legislative Caucus and the Asian American Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander Caucus urged Governor Joe Lombardo to investigate the incident and ensure transparency and accountability from federal law enforcement operating in the state. The episode adds to a pattern of scrutiny surrounding ICE's tactics, particularly following recent incidents where three individuals died during interactions with federal immigration agents. Concerns have also risen over the growing role of ICE at transportation hubs, with critics warning of potential abuses and lack of oversight. The situation unfolded amid heightened tensions around immigration policy and the increasing involvement of local law enforcement in federal immigration enforcement efforts. Separately, a similar controversy emerged at San Francisco International Airport, where a United Airlines employee allegedly threatened to call ICE on a passenger, claiming the individual did not “act like a citizen.” The incident, captured on video and shared by KQED, involved Julio Varela, a Mexican-American and naturalized U.S. citizen, who described the encounter as unprovoked. The employee, who refused to provide her name, reportedly told Varela, “Maybe you need to be, because you don’t act like a citizen. Get away.” Varela’s family ultimately boarded their flight after another United employee intervened and resolved the ticketing issue, but he expressed hope that the employee would be disciplined and considered legal action. Varela emphasized his identity as a U.S. citizen, highlighting his contributions to society, including owning a business and paying taxes. He accused the employee of racism, noting the timing of her remarks in light of ongoing societal issues. His comments reflect broader frustrations among immigrant communities regarding the tone and approach of immigration enforcement, particularly in public spaces. The incidents highlight the expanding influence of ICE beyond traditional borders, with the agency increasingly relying on partnerships with local law enforcement through programs like Section 287(g). These agreements allow state and local agencies to assist ICE in immigration enforcement, effectively extending federal authority into everyday policing. As of mid-July, over 1,768 agencies had signed agreements with ICE, with many adopting the task force model that grants local officers broad powers to make arrests and enforce immigration laws. Critics argue that this model blurs lines between local and federal law enforcement, complicating accountability and raising concerns about the rights of ordinary citizens. With more ICE agents operating under local jurisdictions, there is growing uncertainty about who is responsible for enforcing immigration laws and how such actions are regulated. The increasing number of uniforms and authorities involved makes it difficult for the public to discern who holds power and who is accountable for decisions made in the field. This trend underscores the need for clearer guidelines and greater transparency in how federal and local agencies collaborate on immigration matters.
10 poročil
RealClearPoliticsNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 6 dnevi Streljanje je ponovno postavilo ICE v noviceNaslov "Streljanje je ICE vrnilo v novice" nakazuje, da so nedavni incidenti, ki vključujejo priseljevanje in carinsko izvrševanje (ICE), ponovno vžgali javne in politične razprave o dejavnostih agencije. Čeprav naslov ne vsebuje posebnih podrobnosti o streljanju ali njihovem kontekstu, pomeni ponovno osredotočanje na vlogo ICE pri izvrševanju priseljevanja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Naslov je nevtralen in se osredotoča na dogodek ("streljanje") in ne na presojo ali zagovorništvo.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports the suspension of vehicle stops by ICE following the fatal shootings and includes details about the policy change. It aligns with the primary source document and provides context about the broader implications of the policy shift.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone is somewhat biased toward the administration's position, particularly in highlighting the policy change and the political fallout. It presents the situation with some emphasis on the administration's response.
Breitbart NewsNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 60pred 5 dnevi Crockett: ICE uradniki, 'ne ljudje na ulicah' nas delajo nevarnePredstavnica Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) je kritizirala operacije ICE med odlomkom na CNN-u 'Laura Coates Live', v katerem je trdila, da niso nedokumentirani priseljenci, temveč ICE uradniki, ki povzročajo nevarnost skupnosti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so kritike ICE-jevih politik označene kot širša kritika izvršne oblasti in prakse kazenskega pregona.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article presents Rep. Jasmine Crockett's opinion on ICE operations and criticizes the agency, citing the deaths of individuals during encounters with immigration officers. However, it lacks direct sourcing to primary documents and focuses primarily on political commentary rather than factual rep
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The tone is clearly partisan, with strong language suggesting bias against ICE and Trump's administration. The article frames the issue through a political lens, emphasizing criticism of government actions rather than presenting a balanced view.
ABC News (US)NeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 75pred 4 dnevi ICE je napadel človeka na letališču v Las Vegasu.Video, ki je bil objavljen na družbenih omrežjih, prikazuje moškega, ki je bil podvržen, v lisicah in pusten brez nadzora, preden so agenti ICE kasneje potrdili, da proti njemu nimajo naloga.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je incident prikazan kot primer preobremenitve ICE in zlorabe avtoritete, poudarja pa jezo javnosti in kritiko demokratskih uradnikov.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately summarizes the AP report about the Maine shooting and the officer's background, citing family and record sources. It aligns with the primary source and provides additional context without introducing significant inaccuracies.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article remains largely neutral, presenting facts without overt emotional language. It highlights the need for accountability but does not take a strong ideological stance, maintaining a balanced approach.
The New York Times (US)Neodvisen🔒ProgresivnoDejstva 65Objektivnost 60pred 3 dnevi Kako se razpadajo kazenske primere proti protestnikom ICEThe New York Times poroča, da je bilo na stotine kazenskih primerov proti protestnikom in priseljencem, ki jih je sprožila ameriška imigracijska in carinska služba (ICE), zavrnjenih ali zapuščenih.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je razpad ICE primerov označen kot pokazatelj sistemskih neuspehov pri izvrševanju, kar je v skladu s progresivnimi kritikami priseljevalnih politik.
Zakaj dejstva (65): The article reports on a different incident at a Las Vegas airport, which is not covered in the primary source. While it provides accurate details about the event, it lacks connection to the main topic of ICE shootings and the associated controversies.
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article is presented in a neutral tone, but it focuses on a separate issue that is not aligned with the primary source. The framing of the incident as controversial may influence the reader's interpretation.
NewsweekNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 60Objektivnost 55pred 3 dnevi ICE grozi Američanom, da ne delujejo kot državljani.Zaposlenica United Airlines naj bi med sporom o izdaji vozovnic na mednarodnem letališču v San Franciscu zagrozila, da bo poklicala ameriško priseljevalsko in carinsko službo (ICE) za potnika, Julio Varela, naturaliziranega ameriškega državljana. Incident, ki ga je posnel video in ga je delil KQED, prikazuje, da je zaposlena obtožila Varela, da se ni "obnašala kot državljan" in ni želela posredovati svojega imena. Varela je trdila, da je zaposlena zanemarjala prizadevanja za reševanje zapletene napake pri izdaji vozovnic, ki vključujejo Air Canada in United Airlines. Medtem ko je United Airlines izjavila, da preiskuje incident, je Varela izrazila upanje, da bo zaposlena disciplinirana. Dogodek se zgodi med povečanimi zaskrbljenostmi zaradi prisotnosti ICE na letališčih po nedavnih incidentih priseljevanja, ki so sprožili odziv javnosti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se incident prikazuje kot del širše zaskrbljenosti glede prisotnosti ICE in priseljevanja, kar se ujema s progresivnimi pripovedmi, kritičnimi do politik Trumpove dobe.
Zakaj dejstva (60): This article is unrelated to the primary source and focuses on a different topic entirely—criminal cases against protesters. As such, it doesn't align with the factual content of the primary source document about ICE shootings.
Zakaj objektivnost (55): The article is not objective in relation to the primary source, as it addresses a completely different subject. Its tone and focus do not contribute to understanding the events described in the primary source.
CBS News (US)NeodvisenSredinaDejstva 60Objektivnost 55pred 4 dnevi Video prikazuje policiste v civilni obleki, ki poskušajo zadržati človeka na letališču v Las Vegasu.Članek opisuje incident na letališču Harry Reid v Las Vegasu, kjer so policisti ICE v civilni obleki poskušali pridržati moškega, za katerega so domnevali, da je prekoračil vizum.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dogodek kot dejanski dogodek, ne da bi odprto kritiziral ali pohvalil ICE agente ali civiliste, ki so bili vpleteni.
Zakaj dejstva (60): This article is unrelated to the primary source and discusses missing body camera footage in general, not specifically tied to the recent shootings. It lacks detailed information about the specific incidents referenced in the primary source, thus limiting its factual alignment.
Zakaj objektivnost (55): The article is framed as a question, which may suggest skepticism toward ICE, but it does not take a definitive stance. The tone is somewhat critical, implying doubts about the agency's practices without providing full context.
Fox News (US)NeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 60Objektivnost 55pred 6 dnevi Moškega, ki je bežal pred policisti, je na Floridi zadel traktor in ga ubil, pravi policija.28-letnega mehiškega moškega je smrtno zadel traktor, ko je bežal pred agentom ameriške priseljevalne in carinske uprave (ICE) v St. Augustineju na Floridi. Incident se je zgodil med prometnim zaustavitvijo, kjer so vsi štirje potniki v vozilu pobegnili peš, žrtev pa je tekla čez prometno prometno cesto in jo je zadel kamionet.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku se incident prikazuje v kontekstu operacij ICE in poudarja sporno spremembo politike pod Trumpovo administracijo.
Zakaj dejstva (60): The article briefly mentions the ICE shootings but focuses more on body cameras and the lack of oversight. It references former Secretary Noem's comments but does not tie them directly to the primary source. The information is somewhat relevant but not deeply connected to the core event.
Zakaj objektivnost (55): The article leans toward advocacy, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency. It uses language that suggests criticism of ICE without presenting opposing viewpoints, indicating a lack of balance.
NewsweekNeodvisenKonservativnopred 5 urami ICE je najhitreje rastoča franšiza v Ameriki.V članku je razpravljeno o tem, kako prisotnost priseljevanja in carinjenja (ICE) širi s partnerstvi z državnimi in lokalnimi organi kazenskega pregona v skladu s členom 287 ((g) Zakona o priseljevanju in državljanstvu. Ti sporazumi omogočajo lokalnim uradnikom, da pomagajo pri nalogah priseljevanja, kot so obslužni nalog, preverjanje priseljevalnega statusa in sodelovanje v delovnih skupinah, kjer lahko opravijo aretacije. V članku se ta širitev primerja s franšiznim modelom, poudarjajoč, da je bilo sredino julija 2025 aktivnih 1768 agencij in 2125 sporazumov v 1801 agencijah, pri čemer jih je 1420 uporabljalo model delovne skupine. V članku je navedeno, da ta rast presega celo širitev velikih franšiznih restavracij, kot je Wingstop.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku se razširi ICE kot strateška in učinkovita metoda za povečanje svojega dosega, primerja pa jo z uspešnim franšiznim modelom.
The NationNeodvisenProgresivnopred 10 urami Vsak teden še ena žrtev ICE-jaV članku se razpravlja o smrti Dara Hermana Zierleina Lorenza Salgada Arauja, ki je bil opisan kot oče, član skupnosti, delodajalec in lastnik hiše.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek uporablja čustveno napolnjen jezik ("žrtev") in se osredotoča na človeški davek od ukrepov ICE, ki se ujema z levičarsko perspektivo, ki pogosto kritizira politike priseljevanja.
The AtlanticNeodvisen🔒Progresivnopred 7 dnevi Ustrelec v Maineu je bil novi rekrut ICE.Članek poroča, da je imigracijsko-carinsko službo (ICE) nedavno zaposlila strelca v Maineu. Poudarja ozadje in povezavo posameznika z ICE, kar kaže na morebitne posledice za policijo in priseljevalne politike. Članek raziskuje širši kontekst praks zaposlovanja znotraj ICE in postavlja vprašanja o presečišču notranje varnosti in priseljevanja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je rekrutiranje strelca v ICE-ju opisano na način, ki kaže na morebitne sistemske težave v agenciji, kar pomeni možne prekoračitve ali problematične prednostne naloge.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik