ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Strokovnjak o nesreči: Varnostna razdalja pri 150 kilometrih na uro je bila premajhna
Slovenia🏛️ PolitikaSredinapred 19 urami

Strokovnjak o nesreči: Varnostna razdalja pri 150 kilometrih na uro je bila premajhna

31. julija se je v predoru Kastelec na obalni avtocesti zgodila prometna nesreča, v kateri so bili vpleteni predsednik Nataša Pirc Musar in dva njena prijatelja. Incident je posnel na video in ga analiziral dr. Peter Vidmar, dekan Fakultete za posel in promet, ki je ocenil, da je vozilo, ki je vodilo predsedniški konvoj, potovalo s hitrostjo približno 150 km/h, medtem ko je minivan, ki je prevažal predsednika, bil približno 30-35 metrov za njim, kar je smatral za nezadostno varnostno razdaljo pri tej hitrosti. Omenil je, da bi lahko bil reakcijski čas voznika kritičen, pri čemer bi usposobljeni vozniki imeli reakcijski čas 0,5 sekunde v primerjavi s povprečno 0,8-1 sekunde. Video je pokazal, da so se varnostne luči v predoru pred trčenjem aktivirale, kar je povzročilo, da so se vozila zavirala. Vidmar je predlagal, da bi tunel lahko imel sistem za samodejno opozarjanje voznikov, ki se približujejo z visoko hitrostjo. Incident je sprožil vprašanja o varnostnih ukrepih in odzivih.

A traffic accident involving Slovenia's president Nataša Pirc Musar occurred on July 31 on the coastal motorway near the Kastelec tunnel. According to footage released by Slovenian public broadcaster Televizija Slovenija and POP TV, the incident involved a convoy of three vehicles carrying the president and two female companions. The footage shows the presidential convoy passing through the tunnel with blue lights on the left lane, moving past a column of other vehicles. Two civilian cars were ahead on the left lane, first one was initially overtaken, the second managed to move to the right lane, while the first remained in the middle of the road. The official vehicle leading the convoy successfully maneuvered around the stationary car but nearly stopped, before being struck by a delivery truck containing the president and her friends. The truck then veered off into the left side of the tunnel. Dr. Peter Vidmar, dean of the Faculty of Maritime Affairs and Transport, analyzed the footage during his appearance on the 24ur zvečer program. He estimated that the lead vehicle in the convoy was traveling at approximately 150 kilometers per hour, with the delivery truck maintaining a safety distance of between 30 and 35 meters. At such speeds, he noted, this distance is insufficient. He explained that a trained driver might have a reaction time of 0.5 seconds, whereas an average person’s reaction time ranges from 0.8 to one second. This difference becomes critical at high speeds, as vehicles cannot physically stop or reduce speed quickly enough to avoid collisions. Vidmar further stated that the gap between the vehicle in the convoy and the one ahead could have been between 80 and 100 kilometers per hour, highlighting the lack of adequate spacing. The footage also reveals that the security lighting in the tunnel activated just before the collision, prompting the vehicles to brake. Vidmar suggested that the system in the tunnel might automatically trigger warnings for drivers approaching at excessive speeds. However, he emphasized that the situation was complex, noting that all accidents are tragic and leave lasting psychological impacts on those involved. He acknowledged that the specific circumstances, marked differences in speed between vehicles, made the crash unavoidable despite efforts to maintain safe distances. An online poll conducted after the incident asked respondents to identify who was responsible for the accident. Over 65% of voters blamed the drivers of the escort vehicles, citing their higher speed and reduced safety margins. A smaller percentage attributed fault to the driver of the delivery truck or to poor organization of the protocol-driven driving. One respondent suggested that if all parties had been involved, the injuries would have been less severe. Meanwhile, another incident unfolded in Split, Croatia, on August 28, when a cyclist attacked a car carrying three children. The woman, who was driving her car, was approached by a man on an electric bicycle who suddenly stopped directly in front of her vehicle. The cyclist, visibly agitated, climbed off his bike and violently struck the windshield with his hand, shattering the glass. He then fled the scene immediately. The children, including an infant, were deeply shaken by the attack, which has left the family in shock. The husband of the driver contacted authorities and expressed hope that the perpetrator would face legal consequences. Police confirmed they received the report promptly and swiftly identified the suspect, a 35-year-old man, based on detailed descriptions. They detained him and initiated a criminal investigation into potential charges of damaging property. The incident underscores the dangers posed by reckless behavior in traffic and highlights the need for vigilance and responsibility among individuals.

Pojdite k primarnim virom (1)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

2 poročil

Večer logoVečerNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 70včeraj
Kolesar v Splitu napadel avtomobil: S pestjo je razbil vetrobransko steklo, v vozilu so bili trije otroci

V Splitu je kolesar napadel avto s tremi otroki in z roko razbil vetrobransko steklo. Incident se je zgodil 28. avgusta 2026 na ulici Ivana Meštrovića v predmestju Meje. 19-letni voznici je pristopil moški na električnem kolesu, ki se je nenadoma ustavil pred njenim vozilom, ne da bi pozoren na promet.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanski opis kaznivega dejanja brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja. Medtem ko incident vključuje javno varnost in izvrševanje zakona, ni jasnega političnega načrta ali pristranskega jezika. Osredotočenost ostaja na sam dogodek, vpliv na družino in policijski odziv,

Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports the incident described in the primary source document, including the location (Split, Meje), the time (August 28), the cyclist’s actions, and the police response. It aligns closely with the details provided in the primary source.

Zakaj objektivnost (70): While the article presents the facts objectively, it uses some emotionally charged terms like 'napadel' (attacked) and 'nasilnež' (aggressor), which could imply bias against the cyclist. However, it still provides a relatively balanced account of the event and includes quotes from the affected famil

Siol.net logoSiol.netDržavni / javniSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 60pred 19 urami
Strokovnjak o nesreči: Varnostna razdalja pri 150 kilometrih na uro je bila premajhna

31. julija se je v predoru Kastelec na obalni avtocesti zgodila prometna nesreča, v kateri so bili vpleteni predsednik Nataša Pirc Musar in dva njena prijatelja. Incident je posnel na video in ga analiziral dr. Peter Vidmar, dekan Fakultete za posel in promet, ki je ocenil, da je vozilo, ki je vodilo predsedniški konvoj, potovalo s hitrostjo približno 150 km/h, medtem ko je minivan, ki je prevažal predsednika, bil približno 30-35 metrov za njim, kar je smatral za nezadostno varnostno razdaljo pri tej hitrosti. Omenil je, da bi lahko bil reakcijski čas voznika kritičen, pri čemer bi usposobljeni vozniki imeli reakcijski čas 0,5 sekunde v primerjavi s povprečno 0,8-1 sekunde. Video je pokazal, da so se varnostne luči v predoru pred trčenjem aktivirale, kar je povzročilo, da so se vozila zavirala. Vidmar je predlagal, da bi tunel lahko imel sistem za samodejno opozarjanje voznikov, ki se približujejo z visoko hitrostjo. Incident je sprožil vprašanja o varnostnih ukrepih in odzivih.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja objektivno analizo nesreče, ki se osredotoča na tehnične vidike, kot so hitrost, varnostne razdalje in reakcijski časi.

Zakaj dejstva (75): The article discusses a different incident involving a car accident in Kastelec involving the President of Slovenia, not the event described in the primary source document. It references a traffic safety expert but does not mention the specific case from Split. The facts presented are unrelated to t

Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'dramatičen dogodek' and 'nasilnež', which frames the cyclist as an aggressor. It also emphasizes the trauma experienced by the children without providing balanced perspective or context about the cyclist’s actions.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe