ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Seksistična "Manosfera" je "tako slaba za javnost kot kajenje in hitra hrana"
United Kingdom🏛️ PolitikaProgresivnoSpregledano pri konservativnih

Seksistična "Manosfera" je "tako slaba za javnost kot kajenje in hitra hrana"

Novo poročilo, objavljeno v The Lancetu, trdi, da bi bilo treba spletno "Manosfero", mrežo skupnosti, ki spodbujajo mizoginske poglede in tradicionalne spolne vloge, zaradi njenega vpliva na javno zdravje urediti podobno kot tobak in hitro hrano. Raziskovalci trdijo, da te platforme izkoriščajo jezo in negotovost mladih moških, kar prispeva k nasilju nad ženskami, duševnim težavam in obotavljanju moških, da poiščejo pomoč. Profesorka Sarah Hawkes, soavtorka študije, je poudarila, da je za učinkovito ureditev potrebno zagotoviti alternativne sisteme za podporo fantom, namesto da bi preprosto odstranili škodljive vsebine. Poročilo poudarja, da se pomemben del mladih moških povezuje s takšnimi vplivnimi osebami, pri čemer navaja prejšnje podatke, ki kažejo, da ima vsak šesti deček, star od šest do 15 let, pozitivno mnenje o kontroverzni osebi Andrew Tate. Avtorji priporočajo usklajen odziv, ki vključuje vlade, šole in zdravstvene službe, in predlagajo, da se algoritmi uporabijo za preprečevanje škodljivih pripovedi z pozitivnimi sporočili.

A new report published in the medical journal The Lancet argues that the online subculture known as the Manosphere should be classified as a public health crisis. The authors contend that the movement requires regulatory measures comparable to those applied to tobacco and ultra-processed foods. They assert that the current digital landscape profits from the anger and insecurities of young men, creating a commercial ecosystem that mirrors the strategies used by the tobacco industry to shift responsibility onto individuals. The report defines the Manosphere as a diffuse commercial ecosystem and a loose collection of online communities. These groups are united by shared beliefs regarding masculinity, misogyny, and male victimization. At the core of the movement is a perceived crisis of masculinity and a widespread conviction that feminism has systematically disadvantaged men. According to the researchers, these online spaces spread misogynistic ideas, exposing many men and boys to negative portrayals of women and girls. In certain forums, the content suggests that women are weak, should obey men, belong exclusively in the kitchen, and are only capable of motherhood. The authors highlight that the Manosphere has evolved into a lucrative industry. Content creators and hosting platforms generate revenue by promoting the most extreme expressions of misogyny and aggrieved masculinity. The report notes that outrage and grievance are considered beneficial for business within this environment. Consequently, the system rewards the most extreme content. Boys and young men are specifically targeted, with their fears and vulnerabilities exploited for financial gain. The authors compare this dynamic to the tactics of the tobacco and ultra-processed food industries, which frame health harms as the result of individual choices rather than structural conditions. Specifically, the report states that men’s problems are framed as the result of feminism rather than broader societal issues. Masculine identity is commodified through products and paid content that normalize and reinforce health-harming, performance-oriented masculinities. Furthermore, efforts to regulate or moderate this content are frequently characterized as threats to men’s autonomy, which restricts the political space available for intervention. Professor Sarah Hawkes, a co-author of the report and co-founder of the social justice think tank Global 50/50, emphasized that the Manosphere offers boys and young men a sense of belonging, identity, and an explanation for why life feels difficult. She noted that these needs are real. Hawkes warned that a response focused solely on removing the Manosphere without offering a credible alternative would fail. She argued that society needs to provide boys with better options rather than simply telling them what to avoid. Fellow co-author Professor Kent Buse, affiliated with the Department of Global Population Health at Monash University Malaysia, stressed that boys and men are not the problem. Instead, he identified the business model targeting them as the central issue. Buse described the situation as a business model rather than a fringe phenomenon. He predicted that the industry would continue to use the playbook that served the tobacco sector effectively: blaming the individual and labeling regulation as an attack on freedom. Buse asserted that public health possesses a tested toolkit for addressing commercial harms and urged authorities to utilize it. He pointed to the conditions that leave young men isolated and without a secure future, as well as the companies profiting from their anger and insecurity, as the root causes. The report outlines several specific health harms associated with the Manosphere. These include increased violence against women and girls, mental health issues, and the delegitimization of help-seeking behaviors among boys and men. Previous research cited in the coverage indicates that approximately 63 percent of young men watch masculinity influencers. Additionally, one in six boys aged six to 15 reportedly holds a positive opinion of Andrew Tate, a controversial influencer discussed in relation to the Manosphere. The Children’s Society has warned that such views can escalate into physical and sexual violence against women and girls when they become extremely distorted. To address these issues, the authors propose a coordinated response involving governments, schools, health services, and community organizations. This approach should mirror the public health responses to risks like obesity or smoking. Key recommendations include boosting employment opportunities, improving skills training to enhance job access, and re-engaging boys in education. The report also calls for equitable access to mental health and other frontline health services designed to reach this demographic. Regarding communication strategies, the authors advise avoiding narratives that frame masculinity as inherently toxic or boys and men as inherently problematic. Regulation should focus on online platforms rather than users. This approach draws a parallel to bans on tobacco advertisements directed at children, rather than criminalizing smokers. Mark Brooks, the policy and communications director at the Centre for Policy Research on Men and Boys, welcomed the report’s stance. He noted that the Manosphere discussion has often incorrectly positioned all men and boys as the problem, ignoring the broader economic, educational, and cultural challenges driving their engagement. Brooks added that not all men and boys engage with this content equally, and his organization is currently conducting research to identify who is most at risk. Contextual to the rise of this discourse, Louis Theroux investigated the misogynist world for a documentary after hearing his own sons discuss Andrew Tate in 2022. Meanwhile, prosecutors in the United Kingdom have lodged a formal request for the extradition of Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan Tate from the United States to face charges of rape and sex trafficking. The report concludes that the Manosphere is best understood and addressed as a public health problem, requiring immediate action to mitigate its detrimental effects on society.

Kako je nastalo to poročilo. Objektivne novice je to poročilo napisal iz 3 izvornih člankov s pomočjo umetne inteligence po naši metodologiji. Gre za naše lastno besedilo, ne za kopijo posameznega medija. Preberite našo metodologijo.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaSte opazili napako? Sporočite jo

3 poročil

The Guardian (UK) logoThe Guardian (UK)NeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 85
Manosfera in spletna mizoginija bi morala biti obravnavana kot javnozdravstvena vprašanja, pravijo strokovnjaki iz Združenega kraljestva

V novem poročilu, objavljenem v The Lancetu, trdijo, da bi morale vlade obravnavati "manosfero" in spletno mizoginijo kot javnozdravstvena vprašanja, primerljiva z odzivi na debelost ali kajenje. Avtorji opisujejo manosfero kot dobičkonosen komercialni ekosistem, ki izkorišča promocijo skrajne mizoginije in prizadete moškosti, pri čemer opozarjajo, da je boj moških rezultat feminizma in ne strukturnih pogojev. Profesor Kent Buse, soavtor, je izjavil, da ta pojav deluje kot poslovni model, ki nagrajuje jezo, podobno kot zgodovinske strategije trženja tobaka. Poročilo poudarja dejavnike, kot so izključitev iz izobraževanja, osamljenost in finančna negotovost, zaradi katerih so mladi moški ranljivi za te spletne skupnosti. Strokovnjaki poudarjajo, da je za učinkovite rešitve treba zagotoviti alternativne sisteme podpore in obravnavati osnovne družbene razmere, ne pa le odstraniti škodljive vsebine.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek obravnava vprašanje skozi progresivno lečo, pri čemer navaja strokovnjake, ki zagovarjajo državno posredovanje in regulativne ukrepe proti zasebnim komercialnim subjektom. Predlagana rešitev je izrecno usklajena z modeli javnega zdravja, ki se uporabljajo za škodo, ki jo povzročajo podjetja (kot je tobak), stališče, ki ga običajno zavzema

Zakaj dejstva (95): Highly accurate representation of the Lancet report. Correctly identifies the publication venue, quotes specific definitions and arguments from the authors, and attributes statements clearly to Prof Kent Buse. No extraneous or incorrect information detected.

Zakaj objektivnost (85): Maintains a neutral journalistic tone. While the subject matter is inherently critical of the manosphere, the article presents the researchers' views objectively using direct quotes and clear attribution ('experts have said'). Avoids unnecessary adjectives or editorializing beyond what is quoted fro

The Independent logoThe IndependentNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 92Objektivnost 88
Manosfero je treba obravnavati kot problem javnega zdravja, kot je kajenje, opozarjajo akademiki

V novem poročilu, objavljenem v časopisu The Lancet, se trdi, da bi bilo treba "manosfero" obravnavati kot javnozdravstveno vprašanje, podobno kot tobakovno industrijo. Raziskava opredeljuje manosfero kot komercialni ekosistem spletnih skupnosti, ki so osredotočene na prepričanja v zvezi z moškostjo, mizoginijo in moško viktimizacijo. Avtorji trdijo, da te platforme izkoriščajo negotovosti fantov in mladih moških za dobiček, kar prispeva k nasilju nad ženskami in škodljivim posledicam za duševno zdravje. Poročilo kaže, da so sedanje regulativne napore pogosto oblikovane kot napadi na avtonomijo moških, kar omejuje politični prostor za posredovanje. Soavtorji poudarjajo, da je bistveno vprašanje poslovni model, ki izkorišča pritožbe, in ne posamezniki, ki so vpleteni, in zagovarjajo orodja za javno zdravje za boj proti tem komercialnim škodam.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je manosfera predstavljena predvsem kot škodljivo komercialno podjetje, primerljivo z tobačno industrijo, s poudarkom na sistemskem izkoriščanju in potrebi po intervencijah javnega zdravja na državni ravni. V njem je poudarjena vloga gibanja pri delegitimiziranju vedenja iskanja pomoči in krepitvi "zaupanja v pomoč".

Zakaj dejstva (92): Faithfully conveys the main findings of the report, including the definition of the manosphere and the comparison to tobacco/ultra-processed foods. Accurately cites the Lancet publication and includes relevant quotes regarding the commercial nature of the ecosystem. Slight truncation at the end prev

Zakaj objektivnost (88): Neutral and balanced presentation. Uses standard reporting verbs ('academics have called for') and relies on direct quotes to convey the strong opinions of the researchers. Does not inject personal bias or inflammatory language outside of the attributed quotes.

Daily Mirror logoDaily MirrorNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 78Objektivnost 45
Seksistična "Manosfera" je "tako slaba za javnost kot kajenje in hitra hrana"

Novo poročilo, objavljeno v The Lancetu, trdi, da bi bilo treba spletno "Manosfero", mrežo skupnosti, ki spodbujajo mizoginske poglede in tradicionalne spolne vloge, zaradi njenega vpliva na javno zdravje urediti podobno kot tobak in hitro hrano. Raziskovalci trdijo, da te platforme izkoriščajo jezo in negotovost mladih moških, kar prispeva k nasilju nad ženskami, duševnim težavam in obotavljanju moških, da poiščejo pomoč. Profesorka Sarah Hawkes, soavtorka študije, je poudarila, da je za učinkovito ureditev potrebno zagotoviti alternativne sisteme za podporo fantom, namesto da bi preprosto odstranili škodljive vsebine. Poročilo poudarja, da se pomemben del mladih moških povezuje s takšnimi vplivnimi osebami, pri čemer navaja prejšnje podatke, ki kažejo, da ima vsak šesti deček, star od šest do 15 let, pozitivno mnenje o kontroverzni osebi Andrew Tate. Avtorji priporočajo usklajen odziv, ki vključuje vlade, šole in zdravstvene službe, in predlagajo, da se algoritmi uporabijo za preprečevanje škodljivih pripovedi z pozitivnimi sporočili.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je vprašanje obravnavano skozi progresivno lečo, kulturni pojav je izrecno primerjan z nevarnostmi za javno zdravje, kot je kajenje, in se zavzema za državno posredovanje in regulacijo. V njem so v veliki meri navedeni citatje iz skupine za socialno pravičnost in poudarek je na zaščiti žensk in "v

Zakaj dejstva (78): Accurately reports the core claim that researchers want the manosphere treated as a public health issue comparable to smoking. However, it includes an unrelated sentence about King Charles departing The Bahamas, which appears to be a copy-paste error or layout artifact, reducing overall reliability.

Zakaj objektivnost (45): Uses emotionally charged and judgmental language such as 'Sexist,' 'dangerous,' and 'misogynist.' The headline frames the topic negatively before presenting facts, and the inclusion of the unrelated King Charles line suggests poor editing standards.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe