ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Pritožnica: "Bivši Ilva ugasne peči, resna nevarnost za zdravje"
Italy🏛️ PolitikaSredina

Pritožnica: "Bivši Ilva ugasne peči, resna nevarnost za zdravje"

Italijansko kasacijsko sodišče je izreklo dokončno sodbo, s katero potrjuje, da mora bivša jeklarna Ilve v Tarentu zaradi resnih zdravstvenih tveganj zapreti visoke peči in prenehati s proizvodnjo v vročem stanju. Vrhovno sodišče je ugotovilo, da prisotnost 2140 ton azbesta v opremi tovarne predstavlja veliko nevarnost in je opozorilo, da je stopnja malignega pleuralnega mezotelioma med lokalnim prebivalstvom štirikrat višja, kot se je pričakovalo. Čeprav so predpisi zahtevali popolno odstranitev tega azbesta do avgusta 2023, je sodišče ugotovilo, da so zaradi zastarelega in razpadajočega stanja industrijskih objektov zračni tokovi lahko razpršili vlakna v ozračje. Sodniki so poudarili, da imajo ustavne pravice do življenja, zdravja in zdravega okolja prednost pred pravico do dela v nevarnih razmerah, in zavrnili trditve, da je samo odstranitev azbesta dovolj. Posledično se zakonski rok za zaprtje peči, prvotno določen za 15. december 2026, začne uporabljati takoj po vložitvi te sodbe, s čimer se tehnične podrobnosti izvajanja prepuščajo imenovanim komisarjem.

Italy’s Supreme Court has ordered the former Ilva steel plant in Taranto to shut down its blast furnaces immediately, ruling that continued operation poses a severe danger to public health. The decision by the United Sections of the Court of Cassation confirms a previous verdict from the Milan Court of Appeal, effectively ending hot production at Europe’s largest steelworks. The court cited the presence of asbestos in the facility’s infrastructure as the primary reason for the halt, stating that the risk to life and health outweighs economic considerations. The legal battle centers on 2,140 tonnes of asbestos still embedded within the plant’s equipment. This material serves as thermal insulation inside the stoves, known locally as cowpers, which heat air up to 1,400 degrees Celsius before feeding it into the blast furnaces. Although regulations required the complete removal of this hazardous material by August 23, 2023, the work was never finished. While other parts of the site have already had 6,780 tonnes of waste disposed of, these specific components remain contaminated. The court noted that the industrial installations are obsolete and dilapidated, creating conditions where vibrations, high temperatures, and wear could fracture the containment structures. Such fractures would allow asbestos fibers to disperse into the atmosphere. In their reasoning, the justices rejected arguments that removing the asbestos might be difficult or costly. They described such defenses as reductive, emphasizing that these are not simple buildings but complex industrial systems subject to special regulations. The court applied the precautionary principle, arguing that intervention is necessary before potential risks manifest as actual damage. Data presented in the case indicated that malignant pleural tumors caused by asbestos exposure occur at four times the expected rate in the populations of Taranto and Statte compared to national averages. Consequently, the judges deemed the health hazard both serious and relevant enough to mandate a suspension of productive activity. The ruling addresses the conflict between labor rights and environmental safety. The court stated that the right to life and health cannot be pitted against the right to work. It clarified that employment promoted by the state must be healthy and safe, rather than preserved under unacceptable or degrading conditions. Economic policies should support workers through social measures, but industrial operations must not harm fundamental rights related to health, environment, security, liberty, or human dignity. This verdict concludes a long legal struggle initiated by ten adult citizens and one minor from Taranto. Their lawyers, Ascanio Amenduni and Maurizio Rizzo Striano, led an injunction action that ultimately stopped the plant. The company had previously appealed the Milan Court of Appeal's decision, hoping to keep the furnaces running while awaiting the final judgment. However, the Supreme Court dismissed this appeal. A new environmental authorization granted in 2025 had extended the deadline for asbestos removal until 2037, a delay the court found incompatible with European Union guidelines. The Italian government reacted with disappointment, noting in a statement that the decision complicates an already difficult path. Officials acknowledged the ruling but affirmed their commitment to fulfilling their responsibilities regarding the region's workforce. Prior plans aimed at privatizing the plant and establishing a six-million-tonne decarbonized steel hub within four to six years are now jeopardized. Since the plant was placed under administrative receivership to escape the failed management of ArcelorMittal, various attempts to secure a competitive industrial future for Taranto have faced numerous legal obstacles and local opposition. Regional authorities in Puglia welcomed the decision but immediately requested protections for the affected employees. Trade unions and political opposition groups echoed this demand, urging the state to safeguard jobs despite the operational shutdown. Technical commissioners assigned to the site will now determine the specific procedures and timelines for cooling down the blast furnaces. Industry experts suggest that once the furnaces are extinguished, they likely cannot be reused, signaling the end of the hot area's industrial function. The current status of the furnaces involves a pre-heating phase, which will now transition into a permanent cessation process.

Kako je nastalo to poročilo. Objektivne novice je to poročilo napisal iz 2 izvornih člankov s pomočjo umetne inteligence po naši metodologiji. Gre za naše lastno besedilo, ne za kopijo posameznega medija. Preberite našo metodologijo.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaSte opazili napako? Sporočite jo

2 poročil

ANSA logoANSANeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 92Objektivnost 85
Pritožnica: "Bivši Ilva ugasne peči, resna nevarnost za zdravje"

Italijansko kasacijsko sodišče je izreklo dokončno sodbo, s katero potrjuje, da mora bivša jeklarna Ilve v Tarentu zaradi resnih zdravstvenih tveganj zapreti visoke peči in prenehati s proizvodnjo v vročem stanju. Vrhovno sodišče je ugotovilo, da prisotnost 2140 ton azbesta v opremi tovarne predstavlja veliko nevarnost in je opozorilo, da je stopnja malignega pleuralnega mezotelioma med lokalnim prebivalstvom štirikrat višja, kot se je pričakovalo. Čeprav so predpisi zahtevali popolno odstranitev tega azbesta do avgusta 2023, je sodišče ugotovilo, da so zaradi zastarelega in razpadajočega stanja industrijskih objektov zračni tokovi lahko razpršili vlakna v ozračje. Sodniki so poudarili, da imajo ustavne pravice do življenja, zdravja in zdravega okolja prednost pred pravico do dela v nevarnih razmerah, in zavrnili trditve, da je samo odstranitev azbesta dovolj. Posledično se zakonski rok za zaprtje peči, prvotno določen za 15. december 2026, začne uporabljati takoj po vložitvi te sodbe, s čimer se tehnične podrobnosti izvajanja prepuščajo imenovanim komisarjem.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek sodno odločbo oblikuje skozi močno okoljsko in javno-zdravstveno lečo, ki izrecno daje prednost ustavni pravici do zdravja pred ekonomskimi interesi in ohranitvijo zaposlovanja. Uporablja čustveni jezik, kot je "konc igre" za industrijo in poudarja "degradiranje"

Zakaj dejstva (92): The article accurately reflects the core legal outcome: the Court of Cassation confirmed the suspension of hot production activities due to health risks from asbestos. It cites specific details like the 2,140 tons of asbestos and the December 2026 deadline, which align with public records and the co

Zakaj objektivnost (85): The tone is largely journalistic but uses slightly dramatic phrasing such as "game over" and "ermellini" (slang for Supreme Court justices). While not overtly biased, the opening line sets a definitive, fatalistic mood regarding the plant's closure, which leans slightly toward narrative storytelling

Il Giornale logoIl GiornaleStrankarsko povezanKonservativnoDejstva 88Objektivnost 60
Nekdanja družba Ilva mora prenehati: kazenski sodi če zavrne pritožbo podjetja in izklopi peči. Vlada: "Odločitev otežuje pot"

Italijansko kasacijsko sodišče je potrdilo prekinitev proizvodnje na vročem območju nekdanje jeklarne Ilva v Tarantu in zavrnilo pritožbo družbe Ilve proti odredbi o zaprtju. Odločba daje prednost zdravju delavcev pred ohranitvijo delovnih mest, in posebej navaja prisotnost 2140 ton azbesta v predogrevalnikih zraka visoke peči kot nesprejemljivo tveganje, ki ga ni mogoče več odložiti. Ta odločitev dejansko ustavi vladni načrt privatizacije objekta v sodoben, nizkoogljični jekleni center v štirih do šestih letih. Sodišče je poudarilo, da pravica do dela ne opravičuje izpostavljenosti nevarnim pogojem, s čimer je preseglo prejšnje trditve, da je vsebnost azbesta zadostna. Zato je italijanska vlada navedla, da ta sodba otežuje že tako težko pot k industrijski trajnosti za regijo.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je sodna odločitev označena kot neposredna ovira za vladne strateške gospodarske načrte, pri čemer se uporabljajo izrazi, kot so "sodbe o grobnicah" in opisujejo prizadevanja države kot "razpad". Z poudarkom na neuspehu strategije privatizacije administracije in prikazovanjem

Zakaj dejstva (88): The factual reporting on the court decision and the government's reaction is generally accurate. However, the text contains a significant internal contradiction or error in the subhead: it states "La Corte di Milano conferma il blocco" while the main text correctly identifies the ruling as coming fr

Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article displays clear editorial bias against the government and the industrial project. Phrases like "sentenze tombali" (tombstone rulings), "gestione fallimentare" (failed management), and describing the government's hopes as being "smontati" (dismantled) by obstacles reflect a critical stance

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe