Milansko sodišče je izpustilo 30-letnega aktivista Youssefa Siherja, ki je bil povezan z gibanjem 17. oktobra, potem ko je zavrnil obtožbe za hujše spodbujanje kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s terorizmom. Preiskovalna sodnica Tiziana Landoni je razsodila, da Siherjeva spletna sporočila ne zagovarjajo nasilnih dejanj, temveč spodbujajo kolektivno ozaveščenost in zakonite ustavne proteste proti sedanjim vladnim politikam. Ta odločitev je v neposrednem nasprotju s prejšnjo zahtevo tožilstva za pridržanje, ki je trdila, da je bil namen njegovih sporočil ustrahovanje prebivalstva in podpora logističnemu usklajevanju neredov. Sodnik je nadalje ugotovil, da Siher ni neposredno odgovoren za nasilne objave drugih uporabnikov v klepetih v Telegramu ali na straneh v Instagramu. Odvetniki obrambe so navedli, da bi Siher lahko kmalu spet objavil na spletu, medtem ko je tožilstvo predhodno opisalo njegove dejavnosti kot del strategije za ustvarjanje kaosa in spodkopavanje demokratičnega reda.
The release of Youssef Siher by a Milan judge has ignited a fierce political dispute, culminating in a heated on-air confrontation during a broadcast on La7. The incident involves Simonetta Matone, a Forza Italia deputy and former magistrate, who clashed with Edmondo Bruti Liberati, the former chief prosecutor of Milan. The argument centered on the judicial decision to drop charges against Siher, a thirty-year-old activist associated with the October 17 movement. The exchange escalated until Matone threatened to leave the studio unless the host muted her guest. The legal basis for the release was established by Judge Tiziana Landoni, the investigating magistrate at the Milan court. She ruled that the detention order requested by prosecutors lacked merit. Specifically, she found no evidence of aggravated instigation to commit crimes linked to terrorism. The judge stated that Siher’s messages did not advocate for violent action but instead promoted a collective mobilization of protest against government policies. She characterized his intent as fostering a collective conscience, citing constitutional freedoms. This ruling directly contradicted the position of the public prosecutor’s office, led by Prosecutor Marcello Viola and Deputy Prosecutor Francesca Crupi. They had argued that Siher’s social media strategy aimed to support demonstrators seeking chaos and to strengthen criminal intentions. The prosecution described the Telegram chats and Instagram pages used by Siher as logistical hubs for organizing networks. However, Judge Landoni rejected this view, noting that even violent posts by other users in those groups did not implicate Siher directly. She also dismissed the terror charge, stating there was no conduct capable of causing grave damage to the state or undermining the democratic order. During the television program, Bruti Liberati criticized Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s comments regarding the judge’s decision. He called the prime minister’s remarks an insult to the judiciary. He noted that the reference to terrorism in the initial prosecution file was so unfounded that the judge dismissed it in very few pages. Matone interrupted him repeatedly, leading to a breakdown in protocol. When Bruti Liberati addressed her as "madam," Matone protested that she should be called "honorable" or "doctor," arguing that he would not use such terms for a male colleague. Bruti Liberati insisted that he addresses everyone as madam or sir. Matone retorted that he uses "madam" only for his sister, not for professional peers. The debate shifted to the events of December 17, though Matone initially misstated the date before correcting herself. She accused Bruti Liberati of failing to distance himself from those incidents. Maurizio Acerbo, secretary of the Communist Refoundation party, interjected to suggest that distancing oneself from those events is difficult. Bruti Liberati reacted with frustration, asking what he needed to dissociate from and reminding the audience that he served as chief prosecutor in Milan for a lifetime. He highlighted that he had sent ISIS terrorists to trial, resulting in their convictions. Matone countered that he had done his job poorly. She also challenged his description of the indictment as vulgar, reminding him that the judicial office is not a local greengrocer. As the volume rose, Bruti Liberati attempted to maintain control, telling Matone to listen. Matone exploded, demanding silence from her opponent. She accused certain magistrates of arrogance, pointing to Bruti Liberati as an example. Bruti Liberati laughed and joked that he could dissociate himself from the assassination of King Umberto I if she wished. Matone turned to the host, David Parenzo, issuing an ultimatum. She demanded that they either cut the audio of her guest or she would walk out of the studio. She insisted that he needed to stay quiet. Meanwhile, members of the Council of Magistrates have requested the opening of a protective case for Judge Landoni. This move follows the public statements made by the Prime Minister regarding the non-validation of Siher’s detention. Siher remains under investigation for the alleged offenses. His defense attorneys, Benedetto Ciccarone and Yasmina Abu Sharar, indicated that he might resume posting online soon. They declined to discuss specific plans, stating that time will tell. The prosecution has not excluded the possibility of appealing the judge’s decision to the Review Court. The document titled "Revolution, Instructions for Use," which prosecutors viewed as a manual for clashes, was deemed by the judge to lack content encouraging violence. Instead, the judge interpreted Siher’s call to act like in France as a reference to the persistence of French protest movements.
Pojdite k primarnim virom (1)
Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.
Med prenosom italijanske televizijske oddaje "L'aria che tira" na La7 je izbruhnil ogorčen verbalni prepir, v katerem sta sodelovala namestnica Forze Italia Simonetta Matone in nekdanji glavni tožilec v Milanu Edmondo Bruti Liberati. Spor je bil osredotočen na izpustitev Youssefa Siherja s strani milanske sodnice Tiziane Landoni in naknadno kritiko sodne odločitve s strani predsednice vlade Giorgije Meloni. Bruti Liberati je branil sodnikovo odločitev proti Melonijevim pripombam, Matone pa je izpodbijal njegovo poklicno ravnanje in njegovo stališče glede preteklih varnostnih incidentov. Izmenjava je eskalirala v osebne žalitev glede oblik naslova in strokovne usposobljenosti, kar je Matone spodbudilo, da grozi, da bo zapustila studio, če njen so-gospodar ne bo posredoval. Incident je pokazal napetosti med političnimi osebnostmi in pravnimi strokovnjaki glede nedavnih primerov, povezanih s terorizmom v Italiji.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o političnem sporu, ki je bil predvajan na televiziji, in uporablja opisni, vendar v veliki meri nevtralni jezik ("vroč", "beseden prepir"). Predstavlja argumente obeh strani, ne da bi izrecno podprla eno nad drugo, osredotoča pa se na postopkovno razčlenitev razprave, namesto da bi zaupala stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article provides specific details regarding the TV show 'L'aria che tira', naming participants (Matone, Bruti Liberati, Parenzo) and quoting specific exchanges. It aligns with the broader context of the Siher case mentioned in other sources. However, as no primary transcript was available, the e
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is somewhat sensationalist, using phrases like 'Scontro al fulmicotone' (flashpoint clash) and describing the scene as having 'involuntary comic interludes.' While it reports the conflict, the framing emphasizes the chaotic and humorous nature of the dispute rather than treating it as a ser
Il GiornaleStrankarsko povezanKonservativnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 60
Milansko sodišče je izpustilo 30-letnega aktivista Youssefa Siherja, ki je bil povezan z gibanjem 17. oktobra, potem ko je zavrnil obtožbe za hujše spodbujanje kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s terorizmom. Preiskovalna sodnica Tiziana Landoni je razsodila, da Siherjeva spletna sporočila ne zagovarjajo nasilnih dejanj, temveč spodbujajo kolektivno ozaveščenost in zakonite ustavne proteste proti sedanjim vladnim politikam. Ta odločitev je v neposrednem nasprotju s prejšnjo zahtevo tožilstva za pridržanje, ki je trdila, da je bil namen njegovih sporočil ustrahovanje prebivalstva in podpora logističnemu usklajevanju neredov. Sodnik je nadalje ugotovil, da Siher ni neposredno odgovoren za nasilne objave drugih uporabnikov v klepetih v Telegramu ali na straneh v Instagramu. Odvetniki obrambe so navedli, da bi Siher lahko kmalu spet objavil na spletu, medtem ko je tožilstvo predhodno opisalo njegove dejavnosti kot del strategije za ustvarjanje kaosa in spodkopavanje demokratičnega reda.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je sodna izpustitev pro-palestinskega aktivista označena kot velik neuspeh tožilstva, pri čemer se v zvezi z obtožbami uporablja močan jezik, kot je "popolnoma razbija". To poudarja sodnikovo stališče, da je bil aktivizem "zakonito uveljavljanje ustavnih svoboščin, ki jih je
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately reflects the legal outcome described in the consensus (Siher released, judge rejected terrorism charges). It cites specific names (Judge Landoni, Prosecutors Crupi/Viola, Lawyers) and quotes the reasoning used by the court. However, it includes interpretive summaries of the me
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The headline uses the label 'pro-Pal extremist,' which is a charged term that frames the subject negatively before the reader engages with the legal details. The body text contrasts the prosecutor's view with the judge's view but leans into the narrative that the prosecution's case was weak ('strazz
la RepubblicaNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 95
Oddelek za poklicne sodnike italijanskega visokega sodnega sveta (CSM) je zahteval začetek postopka varstva Tiziane Landoni, preiskovalne sodnice na milanskem sodišču. Ta ukrep sledi komentarjem predsednika vlade glede Landonijeve odločitve, da ne potrdi aretacije Youssefa Siherja. Cilj zahteve je zaščititi neodvisnost sodnika glede na politično posredovanje na visoki ravni v specifični sodni zadevi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o formalnem institucionalnem odziva na vmešavanje politične osebnosti v sodni proces. Uporablja nevtralen, dejanski jezik ("zaželen", "kar zadeva izjave"), ne da bi v uredniškem članku razpravljal o utemeljenosti aretacije ali kritiziral niti predsednika vlade niti sodnika. V skladu z
Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan
Zakaj objektivnost (95): The text is extremely dry and factual, typical of a wire service summary. It presents the action taken by the CSM without adding adjectives, opinions, or emotional coloring, maintaining high neutrality.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.
Italy
