ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Poslanci naj bi se počutili ogroženo, Sukič pa: "Če bi ga hotela ciljati, verjemite, bi ga tudi zadela"
Slovenia🏛️ PolitikaSredinapred 11 urami

Poslanci naj bi se počutili ogroženo, Sukič pa: "Če bi ga hotela ciljati, verjemite, bi ga tudi zadela"

Nataša Sukič, poslanka leve stranke Levice, je z odborov Državnega zbora (DZ) vrgla poslovnik v smer predsednika Žana Mahniča (SDS). Dejanje je povzročilo razpravo o varnosti v parlamentarnih prostorih, saj Katja Kokot (Resnica) trdi, da se v tem okolju ne počuti več varno. Kokot je pozvala k naznanitvi zneska kaznivih dejanj nasilništva in zahtevala sankcijo ter vzpostavitev reda. Sukič pa je zavrnila obtožbe, razložila, da je dejanje bilo simbol, ne grožnja, vdarila, da poslovnik predstavlja zakonito demokratično orožje. Vsi udeleženci so izrazili različno: Godec (SDS) je podprla obravnavo dejanj na etični komisiji, medtem ko je Suki kritizirala politične cerkve v sovraštvu.

An ethical committee will examine the actions of Left Party MP Nataša Sukič after she threw a book at the chairperson of the National Assembly during a session. The move has sparked mixed reactions among politicians and members of the public. According to reports, Sukič claims her action was symbolic and did not intend to harm anyone. Meanwhile, Resnica MP Katja Kokot has called for formal charges against Sukič for alleged threats involving weapons, stating she feels unsafe in the parliamentary building. Kokot accused Sukič of threatening to use weapons and throwing the book toward the chairperson of the session, Žan Mahnič (SDS). She emphasized that she does not feel safe anymore in the premises of the National Assembly and demanded sanctions and the restoration of order within the institution. “I personally feel threatened and do not want to sit in the same room with someone who commits such acts,” Kokot stated. Sukič defended her actions, describing them as a symbolic gesture meant to highlight the lack of respect for the parliamentary rulebook. “It was a somewhat angry act, but I certainly didn’t target him,” she said. “If I had wanted to hit him, I would have done so.” She argued that Mahnič had no authority to put a procedural motion to a vote to prevent the session from taking place. Sukič described the book as the “bible of parliament” and claimed it was not being respected. In response to accusations of making threats with weapons, Sukič cited a quote from Bertolt Brecht: “A book is a weapon, take it in hand.” She explained that as a pacifist, humanist, and anti-militarist, she considered the book as a legitimate democratic tool. “For me, the book is our legal democratic weapon,” she added. Sukič insisted that she stood behind her actions and did not threaten anyone. She challenged Kokot and President of the Resnica party and the National Assembly, Zoran Stevanović, to file criminal charges against her if they felt threatened. Sukič criticized their behavior, accusing them of using the parliament for their political games. She also accused Kokot of publicly defaming others and inciting hatred through a social media post reading “Babi se je ftrgalo.” The reaction to Sukič’s actions has been varied. Jelka Godec, leader of the SDS MPs, supported Kokot and argued that throwing objects at someone, whether intending to hit them or not, constitutes violent conduct. She pointed out that in previous mandates, opposition members used language as a weapon but never physically attacked anyone in the parliament. “Do not accuse us of things we ourselves have done,” she urged. Borut Sajović, leader of the Freedom party MPs, viewed Sukič’s move as symbolic. He noted that Sukič highlighted a problem in the current mandate within the assembly. He praised Mahnič for accepting the gesture with humor and dignity. Sajović doubted that Mahnič, known for his outdoor activities, was frightened by Sukič's action. However, he stressed the need to avoid such incidents and emphasized the importance of respecting the parliamentary rules. Mojca Žnidarič (Democrats) praised Mahnič for turning the situation into a joke but criticized the overall behavior in the National Assembly. Democrats condemned similar actions and expressed disappointment over the conduct observed in the assembly. The ethical committee will consider the incident, according to the requests made by Kokot and the demands raised by other parties. Sukič agreed to the examination by the ethical committee, acknowledging that her move went beyond established norms and stirred both the parliament and the public. She believes each person has their perspective on this action and that her voters see it differently.

Kako je nastalo to poročilo. Objektivne novice je to poročilo napisal iz 2 izvornih člankov s pomočjo umetne inteligence po naši metodologiji. Gre za naše lastno besedilo, ne za kopijo posameznega medija. Preberite našo metodologijo.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaSte opazili napako? Sporočite jo

2 poročil

Dnevnik logoDnevnikNeodvisen🔒Sredinapred 11 urami
Bo met poslovnika Sukičeve obravnavala etična komisija? Odzivi so mešani

Nataša Sukič, poslanka leve, je z sejo odborov v parlamentu vrgla poslovnik v smer predsedujočega Žana Mahniča (SDS). Dejanje je povzročilo razpravo o tem, ali gre za nasilno grožnjo ali simbolno gesto. Etična komisija bo obravnavala njene dejanja, kar je Sukičeva sama predlagala. Poslanka Katja Kokot (Resnica) je zahtevala, da se Sukičeva obtoži za nasilno dejanje v da policija oceni, ali gre za grožnjo. Sukičeva pa je zavrnila te trditve, pouladari pa je, da je poslovnik simbol demokratičnega orožja v da ni nikogar ogrožala. Mešani so bili tudi odzivi drugih poslancev, kjer je Jelka Godec (SDS) Kokanila brodo v poula, da je vsak predmet v vlado predstavlja nasilno dejanje.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja oba stališča: Sukičeva trdi, da je bila njena dejanja simbolična in ne ogrožajoča, medtem ko jo Kokot obtožuje grozečega vedenja.

Maribor24 logoMaribor24NeodvisenSredinapred 12 urami
Poslanci naj bi se počutili ogroženo, Sukič pa: "Če bi ga hotela ciljati, verjemite, bi ga tudi zadela"

Nataša Sukič, poslanka leve stranke Levice, je z odborov Državnega zbora (DZ) vrgla poslovnik v smer predsednika Žana Mahniča (SDS). Dejanje je povzročilo razpravo o varnosti v parlamentarnih prostorih, saj Katja Kokot (Resnica) trdi, da se v tem okolju ne počuti več varno. Kokot je pozvala k naznanitvi zneska kaznivih dejanj nasilništva in zahtevala sankcijo ter vzpostavitev reda. Sukič pa je zavrnila obtožbe, razložila, da je dejanje bilo simbol, ne grožnja, vdarila, da poslovnik predstavlja zakonito demokratično orožje. Vsi udeleženci so izrazili različno: Godec (SDS) je podprla obravnavo dejanj na etični komisiji, medtem ko je Suki kritizirala politične cerkve v sovraštvu.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene obe perspektivi, Kokotova trditev, da se počuti nevarno in zahteva disciplinsko ukrepanje, in Sukičova obramba njene simbolične gesta, ne da bi očitno naklonjena eni strani.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe