N1 SrbijaNeodvisenLevoDejstva 85Objektivnost 60pred 4 dneviPredsednik Srbije centra Zdravko Ponoš je obtožil javnega tožilca Vladimira Živkovića za prekršek zakona, ker je Živković dovolil policiji, da dostavi službo belešku za pogovor s Ponšem Informeru brez odlašanja. Ponoš je tudi vprašal postavio u vezi sa uporabom zvučnog topa, ker je tvrdi da je vrh bio koristen, dok je predsednik Srbije Aleksandar Vučić tvrdio suprotno. Ponoš je dodal da Vučić in njegova ekipa večkrat slagali u vezi sa temom, a da ministri ne pozabljajo poslanih Branko Đuričić naredio blokiranje određenog moda na ureju po 15. marcu. Več javne tožilstva je lahko negodovalo nad javnim nerjem nad ciljem postavitja javnega tožilca od stranega politika, ker je bilo treba postaviti paniko o zvučnem paniku.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): Članek predstavlja obtožbe politične osebnosti zoper državnega tožilca, ki sprašuje o zakonitosti dejanj, izvedenih na njegov ukaz, in izpodbija uradno pripoved o uporabi zvočnega topov.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 60): The article presents Ponoš’s allegations against the Public Prosecutor Vladimir Živković and mentions specific legal provisions (Article 43). It references a claimed monopoly on truth by Vučić and questions the use of sound cannons, but lacks direct evidence or primary sources. The tone suggests pol
N1 SrbijaNeodvisenLevoDejstva 75Objektivnost 55pred 3 dnevi VJT "najhujše nezadovoljstvo", ko Ponš razkrije ime tožilca, pa molk, ko se izjava konča v InformerjuThe article discusses the actions of the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office (VJT) in Serbia regarding the case involving the use of a sound cannon during a protest. The focus is on the interrogation of Zdravko Ponoš, leader of the Srbija Centar party, who was questioned about his presence at the protest. The VJT strongly criticized Ponoš for publicly naming the prosecutor involved in the case, but did not react similarly when the content of the interrogation was later broadcast by the Informer tabloid. Ponoš accused the prosecutor Vladimir Živković of legal violations for allowing police officers to provide a statement about their conversation with him to the Informer shortly after he signed it. The VJT has been increasingly critical of various claims made about its work over the past year, particularly those related to the 'sound cannon' case, which led to a series of interrogations.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): The article frames the VJT's actions as politically motivated, suggesting they are being used for political purposes. It highlights criticism from Ponoš against the prosecutors and implies that the VJT is acting selectively, criticizing Ponoš for revealing the prosecutor's identity but remaining unv
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 75 · Objektivnost 55): This article reports on the public prosecutor’s response to Ponoš’s statements, highlighting perceived politicization of the case. While it includes quotes from both sides, it frames the situation as an attempt by the prosecutor to counter political influence, introducing potential bias.
Serbia
