La pm: 'Normale che un uomo deve vincere un po' di resistenza per il sesso'. Condanna dell'Europa
The European Court of Human Rights has condemned Italy over its handling of a domestic violence case involving a French woman and her two children. The court ruled that the judicial process was too slow, inadequate, and ineffective, failing to meet the standards set by the Convention. The public prosecutor, referred to as 'la pm,' had requested the closure of the case with sexist and stereotypical reasoning, suggesting that men naturally encounter resistance during sexual encounters. The court criticized these remarks as reflecting a sexist and stereotypical mindset, which could further victimize women in court. Following objections from the woman, the request was rejected, leading to additional investigations. The Italian authorities were found to have failed to adequately address the severity of the allegations. As a result, the state must pay €15,000 in moral damages to the woman and her children, plus €15,000 for legal expenses. The woman, Audrey Ubeda, described the ruling as a turning point and a victory for all women.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
levo
sredina
desno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
In 2021, a prosecutor in Benevento requested the dismissal of a domestic violence case against a man, citing the idea that men might need to overcome a woman’s resistance during sexual encounters, which was later revealed by Il Fatto Quotidiano. This statement led to a European Court of Human Rights (Cedu) ruling that condemned Italy for failing to properly handle the case, violating the rights to privacy and protection from inhumane treatment under the European Convention on Human Rights. The victim, Audrey Ubeda, along with her two children, has been awarded €15,000 each in compensation. The court criticized the prosecutor's sexist and stereotypical remarks, noting they contributed to the normalization of domestic violence and secondary victimization of survivors. The judges emphasized that Italian authorities failed to recognize the complex mechanisms of domestic abuse and did not make serious efforts to understand the complainants' situation.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents the court's findings and criticisms objectively, quoting the Cedu's statements and the concerns raised by the Council of Europe's expert group. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing but rather reports on the legal and social implications of the case.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 70): The article accurately reports the European Court of Human Rights ruling against Italy over the sexist remarks by a prosecutor. It provides details about the case, including the victim’s background and the financial penalties. However, the tone leans slightly towards criticizing Italian judicial pra
The European Court of Human Rights has condemned Italy over its handling of a domestic violence case involving a French woman and her two children. The court ruled that the judicial process was too slow, inadequate, and ineffective, failing to meet the standards set by the Convention. The public prosecutor, referred to as 'la pm,' had requested the closure of the case with sexist and stereotypical reasoning, suggesting that men naturally encounter resistance during sexual encounters. The court criticized these remarks as reflecting a sexist and stereotypical mindset, which could further victimize women in court. Following objections from the woman, the request was rejected, leading to additional investigations. The Italian authorities were found to have failed to adequately address the severity of the allegations. As a result, the state must pay €15,000 in moral damages to the woman and her children, plus €15,000 for legal expenses. The woman, Audrey Ubeda, described the ruling as a turning point and a victory for all women.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure within the Italian justice system, highlighting sexist attitudes among prosecutors and the broader implications for victims of domestic violence. While the subject involves legal procedures, the emphasis on gender-based discrimination and the call-f
Italijanski pravosodni sistem je Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice obsodilo, ker ni ustrezno zaščitilo ženske, ki je bila obtožena nasilja v družini in njenih dveh otrok. Sodišče je kritiziralo tako obravnavo primera kot tudi posebne pripombe tožilcev med preiskavo. V primeru je vpletena Audrey Carmen Manuela Ubeda, francoska državljanka, ki živi v Italiji, ki je poročala o ponavljajočem se fizičnem in psihološkem zlorabljanju s strani svojega bivšega partnerja, očeta njenih dveh otrok. Po njenem poročilu aprila 2021 je bila ona in njeni otroci več kot tri leta, do julija 2024, v zaščiteni zavetišču. Sodišče je poudarilo, da so pripombe tožilke, ki so se sklicevale na odpor domnevne žrtve kot "normalne", odražale spolne stereotipe in prispevale k sekundarni viktimizaciji.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): V članku je kritika italijanskega pravosodnega sistema postavljena kot širše vprašanje diskriminacije na podlagi spola in institucionalnega neuspeha pri zaščiti žensk.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Italy
