OpenAI pravi, da Apple toži zaradi izgubljenih inženirjev, ne ukradenih poslovnih skrivnosti

Apple has requested a federal court to halt OpenAI’s ongoing use of what it claims are stolen trade secrets, marking a new escalation in the high-stakes legal battle between the tech giants. The request comes as part of a broader effort by Apple to prevent OpenAI from accessing sensitive information related to its products, even as the case remains unresolved. The dispute began on July 10, when Apple filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, along with two former employees, Tang Tan and Chang Liu, who were previously affiliated with the company. Apple alleges that these individuals took confidential product information with them when they left Apple and used it to benefit OpenAI. The lawsuit seeks an immediate injunction to stop OpenAI from utilizing the allegedly stolen material while the legal proceedings continue. In response, OpenAI has taken a firm stance, arguing that Apple’s lawsuit is not only unfounded but also serves as a cover for Apple’s internal challenges. In a detailed motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, OpenAI called the case “baseless” and “pretextual,” claiming that Apple is trying to mask its inability to retain top talent and maintain competitive advantage in the AI space. The filing, spanning 31 pages, uses the term “fail” nearly 50 times, suggesting a deliberate rhetorical strategy aimed at undermining Apple’s credibility. OpenAI further contends that Apple’s own policies contributed to the situation it now labels as theft. Specifically, the company points to Apple’s practice of allowing departing employees to use personal iCloud accounts for work-related tasks, thereby blurring the lines between corporate and private data. According to OpenAI, this policy inadvertently led to situations where former employees retained access to company systems, which Apple now accuses them of exploiting. This argument aligns with the iMessage exchanges and emails that OpenAI recently released, showing interactions between former Apple employees and current OpenAI personnel. Among the key figures in the dispute is Tang Tan, who spent 24 years at Apple leading the design of the iPhone and Apple Watch before joining Jony Ive’s IO, which OpenAI acquired for $6.5 billion in 2023. Liu, another former Apple employee, worked as an iPhone engineer. Both individuals reportedly left Apple under tense circumstances, with tensions escalating prior to the lawsuit. A pivotal moment came in early 2024, when Apple terminated a planned partnership with OpenAI over concerns regarding intellectual property, ultimately opting to collaborate with Google instead. While Apple seeks an injunction to prevent OpenAI from using the alleged trade secrets, OpenAI has pushed back, requesting that the entire case be dismissed. The company’s motion highlights the broader implications of the dispute, noting that over 400 former Apple employees now work at OpenAI. This figure underscores the depth of the conflict, suggesting that the issue extends beyond individual cases to encompass broader strategic and operational concerns for both companies. As the legal battle unfolds, both sides face potential exposure of sensitive information. If the court grants Apple’s request for a preliminary injunction, OpenAI could be forced to halt certain activities until the case concludes. However, OpenAI’s push to have the case dismissed outright indicates a desire to avoid prolonged scrutiny of its operations and hiring practices. The outcome of this dispute could set important precedents for how tech companies handle intellectual property and employee transitions.