DnevnikNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 55pred 11 dneviNekdanji poslanec Boris Mijič je lastništvo svoje družbe Progros prenesel na davčnega svetovalca Roka Snežiča s sporazumom o prostem prenosu, s čimer je dejansko končal svojo sodelovanje v podjetju. Družba je preimenovana v Klukec d.o.o. in njena glavna dejavnost se je spremenila v "rejo kamel", izraz, ki se uporablja za opis pravnega postopka, v katerem upniki zasežejo premoženje dolžnika. Ta ukrep prihaja po tem, ko se je Progros soočil z znatnimi finančnimi težavami, vključno z neplačane plače in davki, dolgovani zaposlenim in državi, z dolgovi, ki presegajo 41.000 €.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanski prikaz prenosa lastništva in finančnega položaja podjetja, ne da bi javno favoriziral katero koli stran politično.
Zakaj dejstva (80): Consistent with other reports regarding the transfer, legal issues, and Mesec's response. Includes quotes from both sides and details about the company restructuring.
Zakaj objektivnost (55): The article presents Mesec's comments in a critical light, using emotive language such as 'slab smisel za humor,' which may influence reader perception.
Svet24NeodvisenSredinaDejstva 35Objektivnost 20pred 7 dneviČlanek raziskuje ozadje in trenutno politično pot Aleksandra Repića, znanega pod vzdevkom 'Nepridiprav', s poudarkom na njegovem prehodu iz zaporne kazni v udeležbo na županovih volitvah.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek zagotavlja uravnotežen pregled Repićevega ozadja, pravnih težav in političnih prizadevanj, ne da bi očitno zagovarjal katero koli posebno perspektivo.
Zakaj dejstva (35): The article appears to be a promotional piece for a sports event or candidate, likely related to a local election or competition. It lacks specific factual details about Aleksandar Repić and does not provide verifiable information. The title suggests a narrative rather than an objective report. With
Zakaj objektivnost (20): The tone is highly promotional and lacks neutrality. The article uses emotionally charged language and seems to present a biased perspective favoring Aleksandar Repić. There is no attempt to present alternative viewpoints or contextual information, making it clearly one-sided.
Svet24NeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 35Objektivnost 20pred 7 dnevi Od zapora do županske tekme? Kdo je Aleksandar Repić - "Nepridiprav"Članek Svet24.si z naslovom Od zapora do županske tekme? Kdo je Aleksandar Repić - Nepridiprav raziskuje ozadje in kandidaturo Aleksandra Repića na občinskih volitvah.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je kandidatura Aleksandra Repića označena s kritičnim tonom, kar nakazuje, da ni pripravljen na odgovornosti, ki jih ima v službi.
Zakaj dejstva (35): The article appears to be a promotional piece for a sports event or candidate, likely related to a local election or competition. It lacks specific factual details about Aleksandar Repić and does not provide verifiable information. The title suggests a narrative rather than an objective report. With
Zakaj objektivnost (20): The tone is highly promotional and biased towards supporting Aleksandar Repić. The language used is emotive and lacks neutrality, suggesting a clear editorial stance. There is no attempt to present multiple perspectives or balance the narrative.
Slovenia
