ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Sestre Jonathana Andica trdijo, da so nedolžne in da bodo nadaljevale z očetovo idejo o ustanovitvi fundacije.
Spain🏛️ Politikapred 15 urami

Sestre Jonathana Andica trdijo, da so nedolžne in da bodo nadaljevale z očetovo idejo o ustanovitvi fundacije.

Jonathan Andic has received new support from his two sisters, Judith and Sarah, who testified before the judge investigating the death of their father, Isak Andic, founder of Mango. The sisters defended Jonathan's innocence and confirmed they were aware of their father’s intention to create a charitable foundation, which he wished to establish as a legacy beyond his fashion empire. The investigation into Isak Andic’s death, which occurred during a mountain trip with Jonathan in December 2024, focuses on whether he fell or was pushed. There is no direct evidence, but the case against Jonathan relies on circumstantial evidence, including potential economic motives linked to the proposed foundation. Estefanía Knuth, Isak’s former partner, previously testified that the planned foundation would have deprived the children of significant inheritance, contradicting the sisters' claims that the family was informed and agreed on the management of their father’s assets. The sisters emphasized that any financial transfers between siblings were balanced.

Sestre Jonathana Andica, Sarah in Judith, so se ta teden pojavile pred sodnikom, ki preiskuje smrt ustanovitelja podjetja Mango, Isaaka Andica, v novem dnevu izjav na sodišču v Martorellu. Med svojim pričanjem so ženske zanikale vsakršen konflikt v družini in pojasnile, da je njihov oče vzdrževal sistem letnih oporok, s katerimi je posodabljal donacije vsakemu od svojih otrok. Po sodnih virih so bile te donacije način, da se otrokom nadomesti in jih obvešča o razdelitvi dediščine. Sestre so vztrajale, da so bile popolnoma seznanjene s temi načrti in da med njimi nikoli ni bilo nesoglasja.

Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je eden od možnih gospodarskih motivov, ki bi lahko spodbudili zločin, bila ustanovitev dobrodelne fundacije, ki jo je Isak Andic želel ustanoviti, da bi zapustil zapuščino zunaj svojega tekstilnega imperija. Vendar so sestre zavrnile to teorijo in trdile, da je bil načrt njenega očeta preprosto način upravljanja družinske dediščine in ne razlog za ukrepanje proti njemu.

Po izjavah Sarah in Judith je Jonathan Andic nameraval prenehati biti izvršni direktor podjetja Mango in obdržati samo funkcijo svetovalca ter se posvetiti osebnim projektom. Ta sprememba je bila po njunem mnenju nekaj, kar je Isak Andic sprejel in celo pomagal oblikovati. Poleg tega so sestre omenile, da je njihov oče razmišljal o ustanovitvi fundacije, čeprav se zaradi njegove smrti ni uresničila.

Med sodno potjo je kot priča nastopil tudi psihiater Antonio B., ki je Isaaka in Jonathana obiskala enkrat. Po sodnih virih psihiater ne soglaša s predlogom terapevtke Julije L., ki je predlagala, da bi Isaak vse svoje življenjsko dediščino pustil Jonathanu. Ta terapija je po istih virih bila tisto, kar je spodbudilo posvetovanje družine in iskanje drugega mnenja. Psihiater pa se ni držal poklicne skrivnosti, kar mu je omogočilo, da je pred sodiščem izjavil več kot eno uro.

Še pomembnejše izjave je dala tudi Isaakova soproga Estefanía Knuth, ki je po njenih pričevanjih trdila, da je podjetnik pripravljal novo oporoko, ki bi vključevala ustanovitev fundacije, kar bi po njenih besedah lahko otrokom odvzelo velik del njihove dediščine.

Preiskava se nadaljuje z navzočnostjo drugih ključnih prič, vključno s direktorjem podjetja Mango Tonijem Ruizom, sekretarko, odgovornim za kibernetsko varnost in dvema moškima iz Unidad de Montaña. Medtem Jonathanove sestre še naprej zagovarjajo svojo nedolžnost in obljubljajo, da se bodo vrnile na projekt fundacije, ki ga je začel njihov oče, vendar ga ni uspel dokončati.

2 poročil

El Mundo logoEl MundoNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 80pred 15 urami
Andičeve hčere trdijo, da je Isak pripravljal vsakoletno oporoko, o kateri so bile seznanjene, in zanikajo družinske spore.

Hčere Isaaka Andica, Sarah in Judith, sta pričala pred sodiščem, ki je preiskoval smrt ustanovitelja podjetja Mango, in trdila, da je njihov oče naredil letno oporoko, o kateri sta bili seznanjeni, in da ni bilo družinskih sporov glede dediščine.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene pričevanja več strank, ne da bi se očitno naklonjena eni strani. V članku so navedbe družinskih članov obtoženca in drugih prič, kar zagotavlja uravnotežen pogled na tekočo pravno preiskavo smrti Isaaka Andiča.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 80): This article presents the sisters' testimony with clarity and consistency with previous reports. It maintains a more neutral tone compared to the first article, though it still frames the situation in a way that challenges the prosecution's narrative.

El País logoEl PaísNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 16 urami
Sestre Jonathana Andica trdijo, da so nedolžne in da bodo nadaljevale z očetovo idejo o ustanovitvi fundacije.

Jonathan Andic has received new support from his two sisters, Judith and Sarah, who testified before the judge investigating the death of their father, Isak Andic, founder of Mango. The sisters defended Jonathan's innocence and confirmed they were aware of their father’s intention to create a charitable foundation, which he wished to establish as a legacy beyond his fashion empire. The investigation into Isak Andic’s death, which occurred during a mountain trip with Jonathan in December 2024, focuses on whether he fell or was pushed. There is no direct evidence, but the case against Jonathan relies on circumstantial evidence, including potential economic motives linked to the proposed foundation. Estefanía Knuth, Isak’s former partner, previously testified that the planned foundation would have deprived the children of significant inheritance, contradicting the sisters' claims that the family was informed and agreed on the management of their father’s assets. The sisters emphasized that any financial transfers between siblings were balanced.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents both perspectives—those of Jonathan’s sisters and Estefanía Knuth—without overtly favoring one side. It provides factual details about the legal proceedings, the family’s financial arrangements, and the motivations behind the proposed foundation. The language remains neutral, as

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 75): The article accurately reports the sisters' statements and the ongoing investigation, aligning with cross-source consensus. It provides details about the foundation and potential motives, but uses emotionally charged language like 'empujado' which may imply guilt.

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe