ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Francoski minister odstopa, ker kmetijski zakon odpira vrata spornim pesticidom
ZA🏛️ PolitikaProgresivnopred 16 urami

Francoski minister odstopa, ker kmetijski zakon odpira vrata spornim pesticidom

Francoski minister je odstopil zaradi kontroverznega kmetijskega zakona, ki dovoljuje uporabo določenih pesticidov pod opustitvijo. Zakon dovoljuje acetamiprid, neonikotinoidni pesticid, za lešnike in flupiradifuron za sladkorno pese, jabolka in češnje. Okoljske skupine in sindikati malih kmetov trdijo, da zakonodaja podpira velik kmetijski posel in ne upošteva znanstvenih pomislekov glede škode za opraševalce in ekosisteme, Greenpeace pa ga imenuje "sramoto". Cukrarska industrija brani pesticide kot potrebne za boj proti škodljivcem pridelka, kot so puščice. Odpustki zahtevajo odobritev francoske zdravstvene agencije, Anses, in so omejeni na tri leta. Peticija proti zakonu je zbrala več kot dva milijona podpisov, ustavno sodišče pa je prej prepovedalo acetamiprid zaradi neustrezne zaščite.

French Agriculture Minister Didier Barbut resigned after the government passed a controversial farm bill allowing the use of certain pesticides linked to environmental concerns. The decision came amid intense political pressure and public backlash over the legislation's provisions. Barbut announced his resignation in a LinkedIn post, stating that the conditions for remaining in the government were no longer being met. He submitted his resignation to President Emmanuel Macron following discussions with the prime minister. The bill, which was approved by parliament, includes measures permitting the use of acetamiprid, a neonicotinoid pesticide, on hazelnuts under a special waiver, and flupyradifurone on sugar beets, apples, and cherries. These pesticides have been widely criticized for their potential harm to bees and other pollinators, as well as broader ecological damage. Environmental groups and small-scale farmer unions have condemned the bill, arguing that it favors large agribusinesses while disregarding scientific evidence highlighting the dangers to biodiversity and human health. Greenpeace called the legislation a “disgrace,” emphasizing its failure to address long-standing concerns about pesticide safety. Meanwhile, the sugar industry has defended the measures, claiming that these chemicals are essential for protecting crops from aphid infestations, which have caused significant losses in recent harvests. The proposed waivers require approval from France’s national health and safety agency, Anses, and are limited to a maximum of three years. This regulatory framework has drawn criticism from activists who argue that the temporary nature of the exemptions undermines long-term environmental protections. A petition opposing the bill collected more than two million signatures last year, setting a new record for online petitions on the National Assembly’s platform. This widespread public opposition reflects deepening tensions between agricultural interests and environmental advocacy. In 2023, France’s constitutional court previously ruled against the reintroduction of acetamiprid due to inadequate safety measures. Despite this legal setback, the current bill seeks to reintroduce similar provisions, raising questions about the government’s commitment to adhering to judicial rulings. Environmentalists have pointed to the lack of robust monitoring and mitigation strategies as a key flaw in the legislation, warning that the approved pesticides could exacerbate existing ecological threats. Political fallout from the bill has already begun to surface, with Barbut’s resignation signaling a major shift within the government. His departure comes as the Ministry of Agriculture faces increasing scrutiny over its handling of environmental policies. Some lawmakers have expressed support for the bill, citing economic pressures faced by farmers, while others have distanced themselves from the decision, fearing reputational damage from the controversy. As the debate continues, the focus will likely turn to how the government addresses the growing divide between agricultural producers and environmental advocates. With Anses yet to finalize its assessment of the proposed waivers, the situation remains fluid. The outcome of this process will determine whether the legislation proceeds as planned or faces further legal or political challenges. For now, the resignation of a senior minister underscores the high stakes involved in balancing economic and environmental priorities in French agriculture policy.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

1 poročil

Daily Maverick logoDaily MaverickNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 78pred 16 urami
Francoski minister odstopa, ker kmetijski zakon odpira vrata spornim pesticidom

Francoski minister je odstopil zaradi kontroverznega kmetijskega zakona, ki dovoljuje uporabo določenih pesticidov pod opustitvijo. Zakon dovoljuje acetamiprid, neonikotinoidni pesticid, za lešnike in flupiradifuron za sladkorno pese, jabolka in češnje. Okoljske skupine in sindikati malih kmetov trdijo, da zakonodaja podpira velik kmetijski posel in ne upošteva znanstvenih pomislekov glede škode za opraševalce in ekosisteme, Greenpeace pa ga imenuje "sramoto". Cukrarska industrija brani pesticide kot potrebne za boj proti škodljivcem pridelka, kot so puščice. Odpustki zahtevajo odobritev francoske zdravstvene agencije, Anses, in so omejeni na tri leta. Peticija proti zakonu je zbrala več kot dva milijona podpisov, ustavno sodišče pa je prej prepovedalo acetamiprid zaradi neustrezne zaščite.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se polemika okoli kmetijskega zakona prikazuje kot prednost velike agroindustrije na račun okoljskih interesov in interesov malih kmetov, s sklicevanjem na nasprotovanje okoljskih aktivistov in sindikatov.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article provides detailed information based on multiple sources including quotes from the French minister, references to environmental campaigns, union statements, and legal actions. It cites specific pesticide names, affected crops, and mentions the role of Anses and the constitutional court, a

Zakaj objektivnost (78): The article presents both sides of the debate, mentioning environmental concerns and support from the sugar industry. However, it leans slightly towards highlighting the criticism from environmental groups and uses emotionally charged terms like 'disgrace' from Greenpeace, which may influence reader

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe