ON
← Nazaj na pregled
"Izsiljevanje, smrtna grožnja": igralka Urmila Sanawar je bila aretirana po pritožbi hčerke nekdanjega BJP-jevega poslanca
India🏛️ PolitikaSredina

"Izsiljevanje, smrtna grožnja": igralka Urmila Sanawar je bila aretirana po pritožbi hčerke nekdanjega BJP-jevega poslanca

Igralka Urmila Sanawar, ki se identificira kot žena nekdanjega BJP-jevega poslanca Suresha Rathorea, je bila aretirana s strani Haridwarske policije po pritožbi, ki jo je vložila Rathorova hči, Deepika Rathore. Pritožba trdi, da je Sanawar skušal izsiljevati 5 crore rupij, grozil družini pritožnika z nasiljem in objavil obrekovalno vsebino na družbenih omrežjih glede družinskega ugleda. Aretacija se je zgodila kmalu po tem, ko sta Sanawar in Rathore prostovoljno privolila, da se bosta podvrgla poligrafu in testom narkoanalize pred CBI sodiščem v Dehradunu, ki preiskuje umor recepcionarke v Pauri Garhwal. Policija je v skladu z različnimi oddelki zakona Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in Zakona o prepovedi neprimernega zastopanja žensk vložila prvo informacijsko prijavo, v kateri je navedla izsiljevanje, zaničevanje in žalitev skromnosti. V zadnjem sojenju je Sanawar izjavil, da bo posnet test na drog razkril skrivnosti, povezane z umorom in drugimi zločini, hkrati pa je tudi kontroverzno komentiral uporabo fizične sile proti Rathoreju. Sodni postopki so se okrepili zaradi obtožb, ki vključujejo visoke politične osebnosti, vključno s sklicevanji na VIP in nekdanjega partijskega voditelja.

Haridwar police arrested actress Urmila Sanawar on Sunday after the daughter of former Bharatiya Janata Party legislator Suresh Rathore accused her of demanding five crore rupees and the transfer of real estate. The complaint, filed at the Ranipur police station, alleges that Sanawar threatened to kill the complainant’s family members and implicate Rathore in false cases if her financial and property demands were not met. Authorities located Sanawar in Saharanpur, where they seized a mobile phone believed to have been used during the incident. She is currently being produced before a local court. The arrest follows a series of legal proceedings involving Sanawar and Rathore regarding the 2022 murder of a resort receptionist in Rishikesh. On Friday, both individuals appeared before a special Central Bureau of Investigation court in Dehradun. They voluntarily consented to undergo narcoanalysis and polygraph examinations as part of the ongoing investigation. The court session was originally scheduled to resume on October 26. This procedural step stems from demands by the victim’s parents to verify audio recordings released by Sanawar. These recordings allegedly identify a politically connected individual referred to as a VIP in connection with the homicide. Deepika Rathore, the complainant, stated that Sanawar contacted her via WhatsApp late on Saturday. According to the police record, Sanawar demanded five crore rupees and required Rathore to transfer the Ravidas Dham property to her name. The complaint further alleges that Sanawar issued death threats against the Rathore family. Additionally, Deepika Rathore accused Sanawar of damaging her family’s reputation by making derogatory remarks about her father on social media platforms. The allegations include claims that Rathore maintained illicit relationships with women in Dehradun and elsewhere. Sanawar is also accused of threatening to assault Rathore with slippers within court premises. Police registered a First Information Report citing multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Indecent Representation of Women Prohibition Act. The charges include extortion through threats of death or grievous hurt, defamation, and publishing material intended to insult the modesty of a woman. Senior Superintendent of Police Navneet Singh Bhullar confirmed that a team led by the Ranipur station inspector executed the raid at Sanawar’s residence in Saharanpur. Records indicate that nine previous cases have been registered against Sanawar across Saharanpur, Dehradun, Ranipur, and Haridwar. One prior complaint, filed by Deepika Rathore last year, alleged that Sanawar and a male associate circulated objectionable photographs and videos of her online. Police arrested the male co-accused in that instance and submitted a chargesheet to the court. The broader legal dispute centers on the murder of a 19-year-old receptionist at the Vanantra Resort in Yamkeshwar, near Rishikesh. The victim was killed on September 18, 2022, by resort owner Pulkit Arya and two staff members, Saurabh Bhaskar and Ankit Gupta. A trial court in Kotdwar convicted the trio in May 2025 and sentenced them to life imprisonment. Arya is the son of former BJP leader Vinod Arya. The current CBI inquiry focuses specifically on allegations raised in the audio clips, which remain distinct from the new extortion case against Sanawar. Sanawar has publicly claimed to be Rathore’s wife, although he has refused to acknowledge this status. During her recent court appearance, she warned reporters that if her narcoanalysis was recorded on camera, hidden secrets regarding the Pauri Garhwal murder would be revealed. The initial audio release sparked significant public outrage in Uttarakhand. The state government ordered a CBI probe on January 11 following these revelations. The recordings implicated Dushyant Kumar Gautam, a senior BJP leader who served as the party’s in-charge for Uttarakhand. Gautam was recently appointed as the governor of Sikkim. He has denied the allegations linking him to the crime. The victim’s parents staged protests in New Delhi demanding the cancellation of Gautam’s gubernatorial appointment due to the perceived conflict of interest.

Kako je nastalo to poročilo. Objektivne novice je to poročilo napisal iz 2 izvornih člankov s pomočjo umetne inteligence po naši metodologiji. Gre za naše lastno besedilo, ne za kopijo posameznega medija. Preberite našo metodologijo.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaSte opazili napako? Sporočite jo

2 poročil

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 90
"Izsiljevanje, smrtna grožnja": igralka Urmila Sanawar je bila aretirana po pritožbi hčerke nekdanjega BJP-jevega poslanca

Igralka Urmila Sanawar, ki se identificira kot žena nekdanjega BJP-jevega poslanca Suresha Rathorea, je bila aretirana s strani Haridwarske policije po pritožbi, ki jo je vložila Rathorova hči, Deepika Rathore. Pritožba trdi, da je Sanawar skušal izsiljevati 5 crore rupij, grozil družini pritožnika z nasiljem in objavil obrekovalno vsebino na družbenih omrežjih glede družinskega ugleda. Aretacija se je zgodila kmalu po tem, ko sta Sanawar in Rathore prostovoljno privolila, da se bosta podvrgla poligrafu in testom narkoanalize pred CBI sodiščem v Dehradunu, ki preiskuje umor recepcionarke v Pauri Garhwal. Policija je v skladu z različnimi oddelki zakona Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in Zakona o prepovedi neprimernega zastopanja žensk vložila prvo informacijsko prijavo, v kateri je navedla izsiljevanje, zaničevanje in žalitev skromnosti. V zadnjem sojenju je Sanawar izjavil, da bo posnet test na drog razkril skrivnosti, povezane z umorom in drugimi zločini, hkrati pa je tudi kontroverzno komentiral uporabo fizične sile proti Rathoreju. Sodni postopki so se okrepili zaradi obtožb, ki vključujejo visoke politične osebnosti, vključno s sklicevanji na VIP in nekdanjega partijskega voditelja.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o aretaciji in sodnem postopku, v katerem sta vpletena družinska člana pomembne politične osebnosti in slavna oseba. Medtem ko je tema v zvezi s politiko zaradi statusa posameznikov (spomnil se je nekdanjega poslanca, sedanjega guvernerja), je ton poročanja v veliki meri dejanski.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reflects the core facts of the event: the arrest of Urmila Sanawar following a complaint by Suresh Rathore's daughter regarding extortion and threats. It provides specific details such as the location (Ranipur police station), the specific sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhi

Zakaj objektivnost (90): The tone is largely neutral and journalistic. It uses standard reporting phrases like 'officials said' and 'alleged.' It presents the accusations as allegations rather than established facts, maintaining a balanced perspective despite the sensational nature of the claims.

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 85
Igralka aretirana zaradi izsiljevanja hčerke bivšega BJP-jevega poslanca za 5 milijonov rupij

Policija v Haridvaru je aretirala igralko Urmilo Sanawar po pritožbi hčerke bivšega BJP-jevega poslanca Suresha Rathorea, ki je trdila, da je Sanawar zahtevala pet milijonov rupij in prenos premoženja Ravidas Dham, medtem ko je grozila, da bo škodovala svoji družini. Dogodek se je zgodil med preiskavo Centralnega preiskovalnega urada (CBI) v zvezi z avdio posnetki, ki jih je objavil Sanawar, ki naj bi vpletli višjo politično osebnost v primeru umora v letovišču Rishikesh 2022. Čeprav v tem poročilu ni bila izrecno potrjena identiteta "VIP", omenjenega v posnetkih, kontekst nakazuje na politično vpletenost na visoki ravni, pri čemer so bile prejšnje obtožbe imenovane Dushyant Kumar Gautam, ki je trditve zanikal. Sanawar se sooča z več pravnimi izzivi, vključno s prejšnjimi pritožbami glede kroženja sporne vsebine in trenutnimi obtožbami izsiljevanja in kazenskega ustrahovanja. Aretacija se je zgodila kmalu po tem, ko sta se obe stranki pojavili pred posebnim sodiščem CBI, da bi se strinjali s testiranjem narkoanalize, katerega cilj je bil preveriti pristnost spornih zvočnih dokazov.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek ohranja strogo dejanski ton, temelji na neposrednih citatih policijskih uradnikov in podrobnih opisih sodnih postopkov, ne da bi uporabljal obremenjene pridevke ali uredniške komentarje. Obtožbe proti igralki in kontekst preiskave CBI predstavlja nevtralno.

Zakaj dejstva (80): This article covers the same event but contains a potential geographical inconsistency or error. It states Sanawar was arrested 'from Saharanpur' while the first article implies the arrest happened in Haridwar based on the local police station filing the FIR. However, it is possible she was traced t

Zakaj objektivnost (85): The writing style is straightforward and objective. It attributes claims to the police and the complainant using words like 'accused' and 'alleged.' There is no evident bias or emotional language, presenting the situation as a procedural update on the arrest.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe