Teksaški moški je bil obtožen umora po tragičnem incidentu, v katerem se je njegov Tesla Model 3 zaletel v dom, kar je povzročilo smrt 76-letne babice.
Marta Avila, žrtev, je bila v svojem domu, ko je Tesla udaril v zgradbo.
Butler je bil aretiran in obtožen umora v pisarni šerifa okrožja Harris. v pisni izjavi za aretacijo je navedeno, da je Butler opravljal dostavo DoorDash, ko je prilagajal glasbo na Teslinem zaslonu na dotik, preden je "izgubil zavest". Dokument je nadalje trdil, da je vozilo doseglo hitrost 73 mph, kar je več kot dvakrat več od objavljene omejitve hitrosti, in da zavorni pedal ni bil uporabljen v kritičnih trenutkih pred nesrečo.
Šerifova pisarna je ugotovila, da Butler ni ostal v enem pasu, preden se je odvrnil s ceste in se zaletel skozi stran hiše.
Tesla je odvrnil Butlerjev račun, saj je izvršni direktor Elon Musk izjavil, da se bo vozilo, ki deluje v načinu polne samovoze, običajno počasi premaknilo po stanovanjskih območjih.
Po incidentu je Avilajeva družina vložila tožbo zoper Teslo, ki jo je obtožila velike malomarnosti in neustreznega opozarjanja potrošnikov na morebitne napake v svojih samovozečih sistemih.
Nacionalna uprava za varnost v cestnem prometu (NHTSA) je nedavno zaključila dolgotrajno preiskavo težav s "fantomskim zaviranjem" Tesle.
Kot sodni postopki se odvijajo, Butler se sooča z verjeten razlog zaslišanje, kjer je bila njegova varščina določena na $ 150.000. On je bil tudi pooblaščen, da nosi gleženj monitor in se vzdržijo vožnje.
3 poročil
Fox News (US)NeodvisenSredinavčerajA 44-year-old man named Michael David Butler has been charged with manslaughter after his Tesla Model 3 crashed into a home in Katy, Texas, killing 76-year-old Martha Avila. According to court documents, Butler claimed he was using the Tesla's driver-assistance system, which he described as being on 'Autopilot,' but Tesla disputes this account. The vehicle allegedly reached speeds exceeding the posted limit and struck the home at high speed, with video evidence showing the impact. Authorities allege Butler made a DoorDash delivery, adjusted the music, and then passed out before the crash. Tesla's executives have suggested that Butler manually overrode the self-driving system. Avila's family has since filed a lawsuit against Tesla, accusing the company of gross negligence and failing to adequately warn users about potential defects in its self-driving technology.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): While the incident involves a controversial technology (self-driving cars), the article presents information from both the accused driver and Tesla's response without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from Tesla executives and mentions legal actions taken by the victim's family, but总体
The New York Times (US)Neodvisen🔒SredinavčerajA Tesla driver was charged with manslaughter after a collision involving the vehicle's Autopilot feature in Texas. The incident resulted in the death of a woman inside her home. Front-door video footage captured the moment the Tesla crashed into the house through its driveway. This case has raised questions about the safety and reliability of autonomous driving technology, particularly the use of Autopilot systems. Authorities are investigating whether the driver's reliance on the system contributed to the accident.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents a factual account of the incident without overtly favoring either the driver, the technology, or regulatory authorities. It does not include explicit commentary or biased language that would indicate a clear ideological leaning.
QuartzNeodvisenSredinavčerajThe U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has concluded its multi-year investigation into Tesla's alleged 'phantom braking' issue, citing a significant decline in incident reports. When the probe was launched in 2022, there were over 300 reported incidents, but by early 2026, this number had dropped to just three. This sharp decrease suggests that either the issue became less prevalent or that drivers stopped reporting concerns. The decision marks the end of a lengthy regulatory review, which had raised questions about Tesla's Autopilot system. While the probe closed without finding widespread evidence of a safety defect, some experts argue that the low report numbers could reflect underreporting rather than a true resolution.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents factual data regarding the decline in incident reports without overtly criticizing or praising Tesla or regulators. It focuses on objective outcomes of the probe without taking a clear ideological stance. The framing remains neutral, emphasizing the statistical trend rather than
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
United States
