Medtem ko histerično govorijo o podzemnih rezervoarjih, HDZ ovce hladnokrvno prikrivajo, da so zagrnile ogromno odpadkovno krizo.

In Zagreb, tensions over waste management have escalated into a political crisis, with local officials accusing the ruling party of failing to address the issue adequately. The situation has reached a boiling point, with residents reporting that they can no longer dispose of household waste in traditional bins near their homes. Instead, they must rely on underground storage units, a temporary solution that highlights the severity of the growing waste disposal challenge. The issue of waste management has become a central topic in Croatian politics, particularly following recent statements from the largest opposition party, which claims that the government's failure to manage waste effectively undermines national identity and cultural heritage. According to reports, the city authorities have announced that waste will no longer be collected from bins placed outside residences, leading to increased reliance on these underground containers. This shift has sparked public concern and frustration, especially among long-time residents who feel the government is neglecting its responsibilities. The root of the problem lies in the delayed implementation of a nationwide plan for waste management. Originally scheduled for completion by 2022, the project has been significantly delayed. As of early 2026, only four of the planned 11 regional waste management centers have been constructed, while another four are still under development. For the remaining three, the necessary design documentation is yet to be finalized. This delay has left many regions without adequate infrastructure to handle increasing volumes of waste. In southern Croatia, particularly in the Split-Dalmatia and Dubrovnik-Neretva counties, the situation has worsened. Local landfills are nearing capacity, forcing municipalities to consider transporting waste hundreds of kilometers away. Such measures would drastically increase costs for residents, as transport expenses are passed on to households through higher utility bills. In Split-Dalmatia, for example, the landfill at Karepovac is projected to reach full capacity within a year. Without the nearby Lećevica Waste Management Center, waste will need to be transported to neighboring regions, further complicating the logistics. The lack of progress has also raised concerns about the efficiency of state institutions. A recent meeting of the county assembly highlighted the urgency of adopting a new waste management plan for the period 2024–2029. However, the plan was delayed for more than two years after its initial deadline. Critics argue that this delay reflects systemic inefficiencies and a lack of accountability. The Regional Center for Clean Environment, established over 21 years ago, was originally tasked with overseeing the construction of the Lećevica center. Despite numerous changes in leadership and staff, the project remains unfinished, with some estimates suggesting it could take another century to complete. Political analysts suggest that the current crisis is being exploited by the opposition, using it as a platform to criticize the ruling party’s performance. Some observers believe that the opposition is leveraging the issue to boost its popularity amid declining approval ratings. Meanwhile, the government faces mounting pressure to provide immediate solutions. Opposition leaders have called for financial support from the state to cover the cost of transporting waste, arguing that the responsibility should fall on those who failed to deliver the promised infrastructure. As the situation continues to evolve, the debate over waste management is likely to remain a key political issue. With no clear resolution in sight, the government faces the challenge of balancing public expectations with the realities of bureaucratic delays and resource constraints. For now, the focus remains on finding practical solutions to ensure that waste is managed efficiently and sustainably, without placing undue burden on citizens.