V indijski prestolnici so delhijci omejeni na dokumente.
V Delhiju se državljani soočajo z velikimi izzivi pri ohranjanju svojega statusa na volilnem seznamu Indije zaradi postopka posebne intenzivne revizije (SIR), ki je bil uveden pred volitvami v Bihar. 63-letna prebivalka Sanichari Devi se je trudila, da bi zagotovila zahtevanih 11 oblik identifikacije, ki so jih zahtevali uradniki med zaslišanjem SIR, kljub temu, da je imela več dokumentov, kot so številka Aadhaar, kartica PAN in racijska kartica.
Arvind Kejriwal, the national convenor of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and former chief minister of Delhi, has been issued notices under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise for discrepancies in his electoral details. The notices were sent because his name and those of his family members could not be mapped to the previous SIR electoral roll. The Election Commission of India (ECI) clarified that Kejriwal’s name was still on the voter list, but the notices were issued due to incomplete details in the submitted Enumeration Forms. The notices were part of a broader effort to revise and update the electoral rolls in Delhi. According to the chief electoral officer, nearly three weeks after the publication of the draft electoral roll on August 31, the list of electors who received notices was released. This included individuals categorized under “No Mapping” and “Logical Discrepancies.” Kejriwal’s name, along with that of his wife Sunita Kejriwal, his parents Gobind Ram Kejriwal and Gita Devi, and his son Pulkit Kejriwal, appeared in the list of electors who received notices. The Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) of the New Delhi Assembly constituency explained that the Enumeration Forms submitted by Kejriwal and his family lacked sufficient details to link them with the electoral rolls from the last revision in their respective states. As a result, their names were placed in the “Unmapped with Last SIR” category. The ERO emphasized that notices were issued in accordance with procedures set by the ECI. Electors who received notices were required to submit their replies and necessary documents to the ERO. The disposal of these notices was scheduled to be completed by October 29, 2026. After verification, the names of electors whose details were validated would be included in the Final Electoral Roll, which was set to be published on November 4, 2026. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta also received a notice under the SIR exercise. Officials noted that her details initially showed discrepancies, particularly concerning the age difference between her and her parents. However, after she provided the necessary documents, her entry was validated and marked for inclusion in the Final Electoral Roll for Assembly Constituency 14 (Shalimar Bagh). Other notable figures who received notices included BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj and former Delhi BJP chief Virendra Kumar Sachdeva. Sachdeva mentioned he had recently learned about the notice and planned to investigate the issue further. Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal was also among those who received notices for non-mapping of details with the last SIR. The SIR exercise aimed to ensure accuracy in the electoral rolls by identifying and verifying discrepancies. According to the ECI, around 3.31 million electors were issued notices. Of these, approximately 13.79 million electors could not be mapped to the last SIR roll, while 19.33 million electors were flagged for logical discrepancies in their enumeration forms. The draft electoral roll published on August 31 contained 97.5 million electors, representing a 32.8% decrease from the 145.1 million electors recorded as of June 30. To accommodate the revised electoral rolls, the number of polling stations in Delhi increased by nearly 15%, from 13,033 to 14,947. Election authorities uploaded the lists for all 14,947 polling stations. An analysis of discrepancies at two polling stations, Sarojini Nagar under the New Delhi Assembly constituency and Shalimar Bagh, revealed a variety of issues. At Sarojini Nagar, 84 electors were listed for discrepancies or non-mapping. Among these, 37 could not be mapped with the last SIR, while 24 cases involved mismatches in the parent’s name and 13 involved discrepancies in the elector’s own name. Other issues included progeny age gaps and parent-age differences. Similarly, at Shalimar Bagh, 233 electors were flagged for discrepancies or non-mapping. Of these, 108 could not be mapped with the last SIR, while 54 cases involved mismatches in the parent’s name and 37 involved mismatches in the elector’s own name. Additional discrepancies included parent-age differences and progeny age gaps. The AAP criticized the Election Commission for issuing notices to Kejriwal and his family, suggesting the process was politically motivated. The party accused the Commission of attempting to exclude opposition voices and retain voting rights solely for supporters of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his allies. AAP’s national media-in-charge, Anurag Dhanda, expressed skepticism about the legitimacy of the process, questioning why the votes of a three-time Delhi chief minister and his family were being excluded from the voter list.
Oglas
Pojdite k primarnim virom (2)
Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.
Glavna ministrica Delhija Rekha Gupta in vodja Aam Aadmi Party Arvind Kejriwal sta med 33 lakh volivci v Delhiju, ki so bili izdane obvestila za preverjanje svoje upravičenosti v okviru postopka posebne intenzivne revizije (SIR). Obvestila so bila objavljena na spletni strani glavnega volilnega uradnika Delhija, ki je ciljala neskladja v volilnih evidencah. Gupta se je soočila s pregledom zaradi domnevne razlike v starosti z njenimi starši, ki je bila odpravljena po predložitvi dokumentov. Kejriwal in njegova družina niso bili posodobljeni glede njihove vključitve v prejšnjem krogu SIR. Član AAP Anurag Dhanda je proces kritiziral kot politično motiviran, s čimer je predlagal, da bi lahko zatiral glasove opozicije.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je postopek SIR označen kot potencialno politično motiviran, pri čemer se navaja kritika vodje AAP-ja Anuraga Dhanda, da služi interesom BJP-ja.
Glavna ministrica Delhija Rekha Gupta in vodja Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Arvind Kejriwal sta bila med več kot 3,16 milijona volivcev v Delhiju, ki so prejeli obvestila zaradi "razlik", ugotovljenih med posebno intenzivno revizijo (SIR) volilnih seznamov. Te razlik se delijo v dve kategoriji: "brez mapiranja", kjer volivci niso mogli biti povezani z volilnim seznamom iz leta 2002, in "logične razlik", ki vključujejo neskladja s prejšnjimi zapisi. Volivci, ki so označeni, morajo zagotoviti dokumentacijo volilnim organom, da ostanejo na končnem seznamu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o reviziji volilnih seznamov in ni očitno pristranskost do nobene politične enote.
V Delhiju se državljani soočajo z velikimi izzivi pri ohranjanju svojega statusa na volilnem seznamu Indije zaradi postopka posebne intenzivne revizije (SIR), ki je bil uveden pred volitvami v Bihar. 63-letna prebivalka Sanichari Devi se je trudila, da bi zagotovila zahtevanih 11 oblik identifikacije, ki so jih zahtevali uradniki med zaslišanjem SIR, kljub temu, da je imela več dokumentov, kot so številka Aadhaar, kartica PAN in racijska kartica.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek uravnoteženo prikazuje izzive, s katerimi se volivci soočajo v okviru postopka SIR, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani.
Članek poroča, da Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) trdi, da je glavni minister Arvind Kejriwal izginil s delhijskega volilnega seznama. Vendar pa je uradnik volilnega organa odgovoril, da so imena res na seznamu in obvestila so bila izdana, ker se posamezniki niso prikazali na prejšnji seznam SIR.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene trditve AAP in uradni odgovor, ne da bi se očitno naklonil eni strani, temveč da bi zagotovil dejanske izjave obeh strani, brez jasnih uredniških pristranskosti in ohranil uravnotežen ton.
Arvind Kejriwal, vodja stranke Aam Aadmi in nekdanji glavni minister Delhija, je bil zaradi neskladja v svojih volilnih evidencah izdan s strani volilnih organov v Delhiju. Obvestilo je bilo del širšega prizadevanja za posodobitev in preverjanje volilnih seznamov pred prihodnjimi volitvami. Kejriwalovo ime, skupaj z njegovimi družinskimi člani, se je pojavilo v kategoriji "No Mapping", kar pomeni, da jih ni mogoče povezati s prejšnjimi volilnimi evidencami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek objektivno predstavlja situacijo, navaja uradna pojasnila uradnika za volilno registracijo in priznava trditev AAP. Ne zavzema jasnega ideološkega stališča, temveč se osredotoča na postopkovno jasnost in poročanje o dejstvih.
Glavna ministrica Delhija Rekha Gupta in nekdanji glavni minister Arvind Kejriwal, skupaj z drugimi javnimi osebnostmi, sta bili vključeni na seznam 33 lakh volivcev, ki so prejeli obvestila o preverjanju med posebno intenzivno revizijo (SIR). SIR je namenjen zagotavljanju točnosti volilnega lista s preverjanjem osebnih podatkov, kot so starost in ime tekmovanja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je proces SIR označen kot politično motiviran, voditelji AAP-a pa kritizirajo BJP, ker poskuša manipulirati z volilnimi listi, da bi izključili opozicijske figure.
Glavna ministrica Delhija Rekha Gupta in nekdanji glavni minister Arvind Kejriwal, skupaj z drugimi uglednimi osebami, so bili zaradi neskladja v njihovih volilnih zapisih izdane obvestila v okviru postopka posebne intenzivne revizije (SIR). SIR namerava pred prihodnjimi volitvami posodobiti in preveriti volilne liste. Sprva je bila zmeda glede manjkajočega imena Kejriwala, vendar je volilna komisija pojasnila, da je njegovo ime dejansko prisotno in da so bila obvestila izdana, ker se on in njegova družina niso prikazali na prejšnjem seznamu SIR. Načrt volilnega seznama, ki vsebuje 97,53,577 volivcev, predstavlja znatno zmanjšanje v primerjavi s prejšnjimi številkami. Poleg tega se je število volilnih točk v Delhiju povečalo za skoraj 15%. Analiza specifičnih volilnih točk je razkrila različne vrste neskladja, vključno z neuspehom pri mapiranju s prejšnjimi SIR-ji in neskladji v roditeljskih imenih.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene informacije o procesu SIR in njegovih posledicah za politične osebnosti, kot sta Rekha Gupta in Arvind Kejriwal, ne da bi se očitno zavzemal za nobeno posebno politično stališče.
Arvind Kejriwal, nekdanji delhijski glavni minister in vodja Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), skupaj s štirimi družinskimi člani, so bili obsojeni s strani delhijske volilne komisije v okviru posebne intenzivne revizije (SIR).
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije v zvezi z izvajanjem SIR in postopkovno podlago za izdajo obvestil Kejriwalju in njegovi družini.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.
India
