Deepfakes, roboti in dezinformacije: AI v izraelskih volilnih kampanjah
Na izraelsko predsedniško volilno kampanjo je močno vplivala umetna inteligenca. Raziskovalci na Odprti univerzi v Izraelu so dokumentirali več kot 2.000 objav, ustvarjenih z umetno inteligenco, samo iz stranke Likud premierja Benjamina Netanjahua. Znan primer je deepfake video, ki ga je objavil Netanjahujev račun in v katerem je kandidat Gadi Eisenkot zagrlil arabskega politika namesto njegovega pokojnika sina, ki je dobil več kot milijon ogledov in sprožil ogorčenje javnosti. Raziskovalni projekt ZebeAI je analiziral več kot 52.000 objav na družabnih omrežjih na različnih platformah in ugotovil, da je več kot 14 odstotkov uporabilo tehnologijo AI, pogosto s hibridnimi metodami, ki vključujejo slike, glasbo ali podnaslove. Politični znanstveniki to opisujejo kot prve izraelske volitve, ki jih je močno oblikovala AI, kjer stranke uporabljajo avtomatske klice, robote in provokativne videoposnetke, da bi vplivale na volivce. Strokovnjaki opozarjajo, da bi se lahko takšne tehnologije strateško uporabile blizu dneva volitev, da bi sprožile polemiko in potencialno vplivale na končne rezultate.
On Thursday, Israeli authorities disputed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s assertions that the recent legislative election was compromised by widespread fraud in Arab communities. While the head of the Central Election Committee requested a security investigation into allegations of foreign interference, police and election officials stated there is no evidence to support claims that the vote was stolen. The dispute erupted as final results indicated that Netanyahu’s coalition had lost its parliamentary majority, leaving both the prime minister and his main opponent, Gadi Eisenkot, short of the seats needed to form a government without cooperation from Arab-led parties. The crisis began following Tuesday’s election, where Arab parties Ra’am and the Joint List secured a record nineteen seats, driven by unprecedented voter turnout. Likud, Netanyahu’s party, initially cited exit polls suggesting a setback for the prime minister to launch a campaign questioning the validity of the vote. By Wednesday, Likud issued a statement declaring the elections “stolen by Arab parties that support terrorism and the elimination of the Jewish state.” The party alleged that severe criminal offenses, including bribery, threats, violence, and forgery, were used to mobilize voters. Likud claimed to possess hundreds of testimonies and thousands of envelopes containing cash, though it did not publicly release this evidence. The situation intensified on Thursday when Noam Sohlberg, the Supreme Court judge presiding over the Central Election Committee, sent a letter to the Shin Bet, Israel’s internal security agency. Sohlberg wrote that serious suspicions of improper intervention by foreign actors acting against Israeli interests had been brought to his attention. Although he stated he was unable to verify the truth of the allegations, he instructed the Shin Bet to investigate thoroughly and submit conclusions within a week. The letter was subsequently leaked to Israeli media, identifying Qatar as the specific foreign entity alleged to have funneled money to an Arab party to boost turnout. In response to the leak, Likud labeled the incident the “Ra’amgate Affair,” drawing a parallel to historical political scandals. The party argued that the alleged interference aimed to facilitate a foreign takeover of the Knesset, the Islamization of Israel, and the overthrow of right-wing rule. National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir called for the arrest of leaders of Arab parties suspected of receiving Qatari funds, as well as figures linked to the Muslim Brotherhood. However, Israeli police contradicted these claims, stating there was no investigative or informative evidence to support the notion of a stolen election. Police noted that election day proceeded with only a minority of irregular incidents, comparable to previous cycles. Dean Livne, the acting director general of the Central Election Committee, echoed the police assessment in an interview with public broadcaster Kan 11. He stated that the committee had received claims rather than evidence from Likud and other parties, asserting there was no basis for accusations of a stolen election. Meanwhile, Qatar issued a statement denying any involvement in the Israeli electoral process, describing the allegations as false propaganda intended to drag the nation’s name into Israel’s internal political conflicts. Gadi Eisenkot, the head of the Yashar party and Netanyahu’s primary competitor, condemned the fraud allegations as an improper influence operation designed to create a fictitious delegitimization of the upcoming parliament. Eisenkot stated that Likud was attempting to cast doubt on the results because they had lost, while simultaneously calling for the specific allegations to be investigated. He warned that Netanyahu was positioning himself to block any potential alliance between the opposition bloc and the Arab parties, suggesting such cooperation would be treasonous. The controversy unfolds against a backdrop of intense polarization and the integration of artificial intelligence into the campaign. Researchers from the Open University of Israel’s ZebeAI project tracked over 52,000 social media posts by politicians between late July and October 23, finding that more than 14 percent contained AI-generated content. Likud accounted for the highest absolute number of AI-assisted posts, using deepfakes and automated bots to stir controversy. One notable example was a 19-second video shared by Netanyahu’s account, depicting Eisenkot ignoring his deceased son to embrace Mansour Abbas, the chairman of Ra’am. The clip, which played over one million times, sparked outrage given that Eisenkot’s son died in the 2023 war. Despite new regulations requiring labels for AI-generated content, experts noted that legal frameworks remain outdated, allowing practices that would be restricted in Europe. Political analysts suggest Likud’s strategy aims to reduce Arab influence in Israeli politics and deter the opposition from forming a governing coalition with Arab parties. Amira Halperin, a senior fellow at the Palm Beach Center for Democracy and Politics, noted that decreasing Arab influence appears to be a key motivation. The projected outcome shows both the religious-nationalist bloc led by Netanyahu and the secular-liberal opposition falling short of a majority. Consequently, either side would need to negotiate with the Arab parties to secure power. As final results confirmed the loss of the majority for Netanyahu’s camp, the debate shifted from the validity of the count to the feasibility of future coalitions, with the Shin Bet investigation set to conclude within the mandated timeframe.
Pojdite k primarnim virom (3)
Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.
Po nedavnih izraelskih parlamentarnih volitvah je stranka Likud premierja Benjamina Netanjahua trdila, da so tuji akterji vplivali na mobilizacijo volivcev v arabskih skupnostih s podkupovanjem in grožnjami. Stranka je trdila, da so volitve "ukradle" arabske stranke, zlasti Ra'am in Skupni seznam, ki sta dosegla rekordno visoko udeležbo med državljani arabskega porekla. V odgovoru je sodnik vrhovnega sodišča No'am Sohlberg, ki vodi centralni volilni odbor, zahteval, da agencija za notranjo varnost Shin Bet preveri te konkretne trditve. Vendar pa je izraelska policija izjavila, da ni nobenih preiskovalnih ali informativnih dokazov, ki bi podprli obtožbe o goljufijah na veliko. Visoki uradnik iz Centralnega volilnega odbora je tudi zavrnil obtožbe in poudaril, da čeprav so se zgodile nekatere manjše nepravilnosti, ni nobene podlage za trditev, da so bili volilni rezultati ogroženi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnoteženo stališče s podrobnim opisom konkretnih obtožb stranke Likud in jih takoj primerja z neposrednimi zanikanji policije in centralnega volilnega odbora. Vključuje citate obtožnikov in oblasti, ki so odgovorne za volitve,
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports the specific political event regarding the 2025 Israeli elections, citing the Supreme Court judge's letter and Likud's statements. It faithfully represents the primary source's definition of propaganda by highlighting how one side uses selective information (blinding o
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The tone remains neutral and journalistic. It presents the accusations of fraud and the official response without adopting a partisan stance. It attributes views clearly to the respective parties (Likud vs. the Election Committee) and avoids loaded language.
Na izraelsko predsedniško volilno kampanjo je močno vplivala umetna inteligenca. Raziskovalci na Odprti univerzi v Izraelu so dokumentirali več kot 2.000 objav, ustvarjenih z umetno inteligenco, samo iz stranke Likud premierja Benjamina Netanjahua. Znan primer je deepfake video, ki ga je objavil Netanjahujev račun in v katerem je kandidat Gadi Eisenkot zagrlil arabskega politika namesto njegovega pokojnika sina, ki je dobil več kot milijon ogledov in sprožil ogorčenje javnosti. Raziskovalni projekt ZebeAI je analiziral več kot 52.000 objav na družabnih omrežjih na različnih platformah in ugotovil, da je več kot 14 odstotkov uporabilo tehnologijo AI, pogosto s hibridnimi metodami, ki vključujejo slike, glasbo ali podnaslove. Politični znanstveniki to opisujejo kot prve izraelske volitve, ki jih je močno oblikovala AI, kjer stranke uporabljajo avtomatske klice, robote in provokativne videoposnetke, da bi vplivale na volivce. Strokovnjaki opozarjajo, da bi se lahko takšne tehnologije strateško uporabile blizu dneva volitev, da bi sprožile polemiko in potencialno vplivale na končne rezultate.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek ohranja nevtralen, preiskovalni ton, saj se zanaša na podatke iz akademskih raziskovalnih projektov, kot je ZebeAI, in navaja strokovnjake za tehnično uporabo umetne inteligence pri kampanji. Predstavlja konkretne primere sporne vsebine, vendar se ne odloča o političnih prednostih strank
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article describes a specific incident involving AI-generated content in the 2025 election campaign. While the primary source document defines propaganda generally rather than detailing this specific video, the article's description of using media to manipulate emotions aligns perfectly with the
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The writing style is descriptive and analytical. It explains the mechanism of the propaganda (using AI to evoke anti-Arab sentiment) without explicitly condemning the actor, though the framing naturally highlights the manipulative aspect. It maintains a professional distance from the political confl
Ta članek proučuje evolucijo državne propagande v dobi umetne inteligence, pri čemer kot študijo primera uporablja hipotetični konflikt med ZDA in Iranom leta 2026. Poudarja, kako vsebina, ki jo ustvari AI, kot so animacije, ki prikazujejo iransko vojaško moč ali ameriškega podpredsednika JD Vancea, ki uničuje Teheran, služi kot sodobno propagandno orodje, ki je zbralo milijone ogledov. V članku je propaganda opredeljena kot selektivna predstavitev informacij za vpliv na vedenje, pri čemer je navedeno, da avtoritarne države centralizirajo ta prizadevanja, demokratične države pa uporabljajo bolj pluralistične, vendar še vedno manipulativne metode. Strokovni komentar političnega znanstvenika Piers Robinsona to ponazarja s pomočjo vojne v Iraku leta 2003, ko so ameriški politiki domnevno uporabili dezinformacije o orožju za množično uničenje, da bi upravičili vojaško ukrepanje. Besedilo se zaključi z razpravo o tem, kako je cilj propagande diskreditirati politične nasprotnike in kako osebnosti, kot je Donald Trump, uporabljajo slike AI za oblikovanje svoje javne podobe.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek ima izobraževalni in analitični ton, ki je značilen za pobude za preverjanje dejstev. Izrecno nasprotuje centralizirani naravi propagande v avtoritarnih režimih in pluralistični naravi propagande v demokracijah, pri čemer se izogiba enostranski kritiki katerega koli posebnega političnega sistema.
Zakaj dejstva (40): This article contains significant factual errors relative to reality and likely the intended context. It references a "US-Iran War in 2026" and mentions JD Vance as Vice President in a war scenario, which appears to be fictional or speculative future fiction presented as current news fact-checking.
Zakaj objektivnost (95): Despite the factual issues, the tone is highly objective and educational. It adopts a neutral, explanatory voice to define propaganda and distinguish between authoritarian and democratic contexts, mirroring the primary source's definitions closely without injecting personal bias or emotional languag
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.
Germany
