ON
← Nazaj na pregled
100% glasov preštetih v izraelskih anketah, Netanjahujev blok nima večine
India🏛️ PolitikaBolj progresivno

100% glasov preštetih v izraelskih anketah, Netanjahujev blok nima večine

Izraelske oblasti so dokončale štetje za parlamentarne volitve 27. oktobra, razkrivajoč, da ima blok predsednika vlade Benjamina Netanjahua 53 sedežev v 120-članskem Knessetu, kar je manj od 61-članske večine, potrebne za vladanje. Medtem ko je Likud z 27 sedeži postal največja stranka, razdrobljeni rezultati pomenijo, da niti provladni niti opozicijski bloki ne morejo neodvisno zagotoviti oblasti, kar zahteva zapletena pogajanja o koaliciji. Končni izpis je vključeval posebne glasove vojaškega osebja, zapornikov in diplomatov, ki jih je obdelal osrednji volilni odbor. Hkrati so volitve sprožile polemiko zaradi obtožb o tujem vmešavanju in nepravilnostih, ki so vključevale arabske stranke, pri čemer je Netanjahu trdil, da so bili glasovi ukradeni zaradi domnevnega nakupa glasov. Varnostne agencije, vključno s Shin Betom, preiskujejo trditve o nezakonitem financiranju iz Katarja in Turčije, čeprav te trditve ostajajo nedokazane in jih zanikajo zadevne države. Centralni volilni odbor je izjavil, da ni dokazov o sistematičnih kršitvah, vendar pa spor še naprej povečuje politične napetosti glede legitimnosti 19 sedežev.

Israel completed the counting of all ballots in its October 27 parliamentary election on Thursday, confirming that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s bloc failed to secure a majority in the 120-member Knesset. The final tally placed Netanyahu’s right-wing and far-right alliance at 53 seats, while the opposition bloc led by Gadi Eisenkot captured 48 seats. A third grouping consisting of Arab-led parties won a record 19 seats. Neither the pro-government camp nor the opposition reached the 61 seats required to form a government, leaving the nation without a clear mandate and setting the stage for complex coalition negotiations. The Central Elections Committee announced the final results after completing the count of special ballots, known as double-envelope votes. These ballots encompassed votes cast by soldiers, prisoners, diplomats stationed abroad, and hospitalized individuals who could not attend regular polling stations. The inclusion of these late-counted votes did not alter the distribution of seats among the major political blocs. The committee stated that the integrity of the vote at polling stations had been maintained, although it deferred the certification of the final official results until a later date. Likud emerged as the largest single party in the Knesset with 27 seats, surpassing pre-election projections that had suggested a weaker performance. Other parties within Netanyahu’s bloc included United Torah Judaism and Otzma Yehudit, which secured seven seats each, and Shas and Religious Zionism, which won six seats each. On the opposition side, Eisenkot’s Yashar party won 21 seats, making it the second-largest force in parliament. Naftali Bennett’s B’Yachad party secured 12 seats, while the Democrats and Ra’am won eight seats each. Avigdor Liberman’s Yisrael Beiteinu obtained seven seats. The Joint List, a coalition of several smaller parties, took 11 seats. The election results have triggered intense political conflict regarding allegations of foreign interference and irregularities in the Arab sector. Netanyahu’s Likud party claimed that Arab-led parties benefited from vote-buying and illegal voter mobilization, describing the election as "stolen." The party issued statements calling the situation a "political earthquake" and asserted that foreign funding influenced the outcome. In response, the Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic security agency, opened an investigation into suspicions that funds from Qatar and Turkey were used to illegally influence Arab voter turnout. Additionally, the police unit Lahav 433 is investigating suspected election bribery. Despite these allegations, the Central Elections Committee’s acting director general, Dean Livne, stated there was no basis for claims of systematic violations of election integrity. He described suggestions of widespread issues as "entirely groundless." Qatar has denied interfering in the election. Ra’am leader Mansour Abbas denied any wrongdoing and welcomed the investigation, while the Joint List accused Netanyahu and his allies of launching a "campaign of incitement" driven by fear of Arab voters' growing political influence. Government officials have not presented evidence to substantiate the claims of foreign funding. Opposition leaders moved quickly to explore coalition options. Eisenkot met with former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett to discuss forming a new government "as quickly as possible." Eisenkot also engaged with Yair Golan, chair of the Democrats party, who is the only member of the opposition alliance willing to consider a coalition with parties led by Palestinian citizens of Israel. All other political groups in the opposition have rejected such unions. Golan met separately with Mansour Abbas, stating that the moment calls for action to ensure the "salvation of Israel." The high turnout among Arab citizens, resulting in a record 19 seats, has been attributed by analysts to a backlash against policies implemented during the tenure of the current far-right national security minister. Members of the Arab community cited rising crime rates, perceived negligent policing, and increased racism following the October 7, 2023, attacks and the subsequent war in Gaza as factors driving voter mobilization. This demographic shift complicates the path to government formation, as the opposition bloc lacks the necessary majority without the support of these Arab parties. Thousands of Israelis residing abroad traveled to the country to vote, as Israel does not permit postal or online voting for citizens outside its borders. Estimates suggest approximately 67,000 Israelis flew home for the election, with a significant portion originating from the United States, Europe, Canada, and Australia. Many paid for their travel independently. Analysts noted that these expatriate voters often favor political change, potentially influencing the equivalent of two parliamentary seats in a tightly contested race. Israel’s president will oversee the selection of a lawmaker tasked with attempting to form a coalition once the results are officially certified. The process could extend for weeks or even months. If no viable coalition emerges from the fragmented landscape, the country faces the possibility of another election. For now, Netanyahu retains leverage as the leader of the largest party, while his rivals struggle to bridge ideological divides and secure the necessary support to displace him from power.

Kako je nastalo to poročilo. Objektivne novice je to poročilo napisal iz 2 izvornih člankov s pomočjo umetne inteligence po naši metodologiji. Gre za naše lastno besedilo, ne za kopijo posameznega medija. Preberite našo metodologijo.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaSte opazili napako? Sporočite jo

3 poročil

India Today logoIndia TodayNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 80
100% glasov preštetih v izraelskih anketah, Netanjahujev blok nima večine

Izraelske oblasti so dokončale štetje za parlamentarne volitve 27. oktobra, razkrivajoč, da ima blok predsednika vlade Benjamina Netanjahua 53 sedežev v 120-članskem Knessetu, kar je manj od 61-članske večine, potrebne za vladanje. Medtem ko je Likud z 27 sedeži postal največja stranka, razdrobljeni rezultati pomenijo, da niti provladni niti opozicijski bloki ne morejo neodvisno zagotoviti oblasti, kar zahteva zapletena pogajanja o koaliciji. Končni izpis je vključeval posebne glasove vojaškega osebja, zapornikov in diplomatov, ki jih je obdelal osrednji volilni odbor. Hkrati so volitve sprožile polemiko zaradi obtožb o tujem vmešavanju in nepravilnostih, ki so vključevale arabske stranke, pri čemer je Netanjahu trdil, da so bili glasovi ukradeni zaradi domnevnega nakupa glasov. Varnostne agencije, vključno s Shin Betom, preiskujejo trditve o nezakonitem financiranju iz Katarja in Turčije, čeprav te trditve ostajajo nedokazane in jih zanikajo zadevne države. Centralni volilni odbor je izjavil, da ni dokazov o sistematičnih kršitvah, vendar pa spor še naprej povečuje politične napetosti glede legitimnosti 19 sedežev.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek ohranja nevtralno stališče, saj predstavlja surove številke sedežev in izrecno navaja, da obtožbe o goljufijah in tujem vmešavanju ostajajo nedokazane. Izravnava poročanje z vključitvijo izjav obtožnikov (Likud) in zagovornikov procesa (Central Elections, Opp

Zakaj dejstva (90): Presents specific final counts (Likud 27, Bloc 53 vs Opp 48/Arab 19) which sum correctly to 120. This level of specificity suggests a definitive result, contrasting slightly with Article 0's pre-vote uncertainty, but fits the timeline if this is a post-count report. Accurate attribution to Israeli m

Zakaj objektivnost (80): Mostly objective in reporting the numbers. However, the section title 'Election Row Over Alleged Foreign Interference' introduces a somewhat sensationalized frame compared to the neutral 'coalition negotiations' focus of Article 0. Still, it reports the allegations neutrally.

The Indian Express logoThe Indian ExpressNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 90
Izraelske volitve 2026: Kdo je kandidat in ali bo Netanjahu preživel največji preizkus svoje politične kariere?

Izrael bo 27. oktobra 2026 imel splošne volitve, kar bo prvo nacionalno glasovanje po napadu Hamasa 7. oktobra 2023. Ankete kažejo na zelo razdrobljeno politično pokrajino, kjer niti desničarski blok premierja Benjamina Netanjahua niti opozicija nista dobila 61 sedežev, potrebnih za oblikovanje večinske vlade. Trenutne napovedi kažejo, da ima Netanjahujeva zaveza približno 49 sedežev, medtem ko opozicija, ki jo vodi nekdanji vodja vojske Gadi Eisenkot, stranka Yashar, načrtuje okoli 54 sedežev. Manjše frakcije, vključno z arabskimi strankami in nepovezanimi skupinami, naj bi igrale ključno vlogo pri določanju, katera stran lahko sestavi vladajočo koalicijo. Ključna vprašanja kampanje se osredotočajo na odgovornost za varnostne napake 7. oktobra, obvezno vojaško službo za ultraortodoksne državljane in življenjske stroške. Rezultat je široko viden kot neposredni referendum o Netanjahujevem vodstvu in njegovem ravnanju z naknadnimi spopadi.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja pregled nadhajajočih volitev, ki temelji na dejstvih, in navaja posebne podatke iz ankete Zman Yisrael/Tatika Research ter se sklicuje na glavne mednarodne medije, kot sta AP in ABC News. V njem je opisano število sedežev za različne bloke, ne da bi uporabljali čustveno napolnjen jezik ali da bi si vzeli položaj.

Zakaj dejstva (85): Accurately reflects the pre-election consensus regarding the date (Oct 27), the seat threshold (61), and the lack of a clear winner. It correctly identifies the election as a referendum on the post-Oct 7 war period. No major factual errors found relative to the other sources.

Zakaj objektivnost (90): Maintains a neutral, informative tone. Uses standard journalistic phrasing ('widely viewed', 'could decide') rather than taking sides. Presents the stakes objectively without emotional loading.

India Today logoIndia TodayNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 85
Tisoči Izraelcev letijo domov, da bi glasovali na voliščih: Zakaj je Netanjahujeva stranka zaskrbljena

Tisoče izraelskih državljanov, ki živijo v tujini, se vračajo v Izrael, da bi glasovali na prihajajočih splošnih volitvah, saj država ne dovoljuje glasovanja po pošti ali na spletu za izseljence. Ocenjujejo, da bo potovalo približno 67.000 posameznikov, predvsem iz Združenih držav, Evrope in Kanade, pri čemer bo večina krila stroške osebno. Analitiki ugotavljajo, da ti volivci iz tujine pogosto podpirajo politične spremembe, kar pomeni, da bi njihova udeležba lahko vplivala na izid tesno tekmovalne dirke, saj bi vplivala na približno dva parlamentarna sedeža. V članku je poudarjeno, da je stranka Likud Benjamina Netanjahua domnevno poskušala ovirati kampanje, namenjene olajšanju teh letov. Ta porast volilnih potovanj se dogaja v ozadju rekordnega števila Izraelcev, ki od leta 2022 zapuščajo državo.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je pristop volivcev iz tujine označen kot sila za "politične spremembe" in je izrecno navedeno, da so nagnjeni k nasprotovanju sedanjemu vodstvu. Z poudarkom, da je Netanjahujeva stranka Likud domnevno poskušala blokirati prizadevanja, da bi te volivce pripeljala domov, članek postavi sedanjega desničarja v

Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan

Zakaj objektivnost (85): Balanced presentation of the logistical aspect of voting. Attributes views to analysts and specific groups rather than presenting them as absolute facts. Tone is descriptive and neutral.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe