ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Par toži zaradi smrti otroka dva dni po rojstvu v bolnišnici v Corku.
Ireland🏛️ PolitikaSredinapred 4 urami

Par toži zaradi smrti otroka dva dni po rojstvu v bolnišnici v Corku.

Par iz Corka je vložil tožbo proti izvršnemu direktorju zdravstvene službe (HSE) na visoki sodišču po smrti njihovega novorojenčka, Georgea Duggana, ki je umrl dva dni po rojstvu v bolnišnici za materinstvo na univerzi v Corku. Dojenček je umrl 21. decembra 2022 in njegov pogreb je potekal na božični večer. V pismu staršem se je bolnišnica opravičila, da po pregledu in ultrazvočnem pregledu 8. decembra 2022 ni izvajala pogostejšega spremljanja ploda. HSE je priznal kršitev dolžnosti glede pomanjkanja spremljanja, vendar je zanikal, da je povzročila smrt otroka. Pravni predstavniki staršev so trdili, da bi pravilna in stalna ocena po pregledu 8. decembra lahko privedla do prejšnjega carskega rezana, kar bi lahko rešilo otrokovo življenje. Trdijo, da bolnišnica ni ukrepala zaradi pomislekov o gibanju ploda in funkciji ploda.

A couple from Cork has filed a lawsuit against the Health Service Executive (HSE) following the death of their newborn son, George Duggan, who passed away two days after his birth at Cork University Maternity Hospital (CUMH). The case was heard in the High Court, where the parents allege that inadequate medical oversight contributed to the child's tragic demise. George Duggan was born on December 19, 2022, via caesarean section at 29 weeks and three days. His death occurred on December 21, 2022, while in the arms of his parents. A funeral was held on Christmas Eve. In a letter to the Duggans, read in court, CUMH acknowledged its failure to conduct more frequent fetal monitoring after a review and ultrasound scan on December 8, 2022. The hospital expressed sincere apologies for this lapse, though it maintained that it did not cause the infant's death. The HSE admitted to breaching its duty of care by not providing more frequent fetal monitoring following the December 8th scan. According to the parents' solicitors, the Duggans were concerned about fetal movement during the scan, yet they were reassured there was no issue. They were scheduled for a follow-up appointment on December 22. Patrick Treacy, representing the parents, argued that if the hospital had detected issues with blood flow, continuous monitoring would have been initiated, preventing the subsequent complications. Legal representatives for the Duggans claim that proper and continuous assessment after the December 8th review might have led to an earlier caesarean section before the mother’s waters broke on December 19. This, they argue, could have resulted in a safer delivery and potentially saved the baby’s life. The baby suffered severe trauma, including bruising and subgaleal haemorrhage during the caesarean section. The parents’ case focuses on the 11-day period between the December 8th review and the baby’s birth, asserting that adequate monitoring during this time could have changed the outcome. Dr. Mairead O’Riordan, clinical director of CUMH Ireland South Women and Infants Directorate, issued a heartfelt apology in a letter to the Duggans. She expressed deep condolences and emphasized the hospital’s ongoing efforts to improve patient safety and care. The letter noted the emotional toll on the family and affirmed the institution’s commitment to learning from such incidents. During the legal proceedings, the court heard claims that the hospital failed to expedite a caesarean section prior to the rupture of the membranes on December 19. It was also alleged that timely investigations or surveillance following the December 8th review could have identified worsening placental function, leading to earlier admission. The case was adjourned when the judge revealed that one of the witnesses was known to her, making it impossible for her to continue hearing the case. The court rescheduled the hearing for the next legal term in October. Judge Leonie Reynolds expressed sympathy for the Duggans and acknowledged the profound grief associated with losing their firstborn. The case continues to unfold, with both parties awaiting further developments in the legal process.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

1 poročil

The Irish Times logoThe Irish TimesNeodvisen🔒Sredinapred 4 urami
Par toži zaradi smrti otroka dva dni po rojstvu v bolnišnici v Corku.

Par iz Corka je vložil tožbo proti izvršnemu direktorju zdravstvene službe (HSE) na visoki sodišču po smrti njihovega novorojenčka, Georgea Duggana, ki je umrl dva dni po rojstvu v bolnišnici za materinstvo na univerzi v Corku. Dojenček je umrl 21. decembra 2022 in njegov pogreb je potekal na božični večer. V pismu staršem se je bolnišnica opravičila, da po pregledu in ultrazvočnem pregledu 8. decembra 2022 ni izvajala pogostejšega spremljanja ploda. HSE je priznal kršitev dolžnosti glede pomanjkanja spremljanja, vendar je zanikal, da je povzročila smrt otroka. Pravni predstavniki staršev so trdili, da bi pravilna in stalna ocena po pregledu 8. decembra lahko privedla do prejšnjega carskega rezana, kar bi lahko rešilo otrokovo življenje. Trdijo, da bolnišnica ni ukrepala zaradi pomislekov o gibanju ploda in funkciji ploda.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis sodnega postopka in položaja bolnišnice, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani. Vključuje priznanje krivde HSE in njihovo zanikanje vzročnosti, kot tudi trditve staršev.

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe