Oman has presented Iran with a proposal backed by Gulf states aimed at managing the Strait of Hormuz, which includes voluntary fees for passage through the critical waterway. The plan was revealed by a regional source and a Western diplomat speaking to Reuters on Tuesday. This initiative could serve as a foundation for resolving trade disruptions caused by the ongoing conflict between the United States and Iran. The situation escalated after U.S. and Israeli attacks on March 28, prompting Iran to effectively close the strait to foreign vessels. A partial agreement between the U.S. and Iran last month reopened the strait, but the deal collapsed early July following Iranian attacks on commercial ships. Iran has emphasized its desire to manage the strait alongside Oman, which controls the opposite shore, and to impose fees on vessels using the route. However, Washington aims to restore the pre-war status quo, where ships could pass freely without any tolls, arguing that mandatory fees would be illegal. According to Oman's proposal, Iran would not have exclusive control over the strait, and the fees would be voluntary. A regional source and a Western diplomat told Reuters that the system would resemble the one in the Asian Malacca Strait, where Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore allow crews to decide whether to pay voluntary contributions for funding navigation, environmental protection, and search-and-rescue operations. The Western diplomat compared this to the voluntary carbon tax on flights, where passengers can choose to pay extra to reduce their emissions. As of Monday evening, there had been no formal response from Iran to the proposal. Oman officials met with Iranians in Tehran during the weekend. Meanwhile, oil prices fluctuated amid the geopolitical tensions. On London’s market, crude oil traded at $86.55 per barrel, down $1.81 from the previous day’s close. In the U.S., oil prices fell $1.49 to $81.12 per barrel. A ceasefire between Iran and the U.S. over the weekend influenced traders’ calculations at the start of the new week. American Undersecretary of State Mike Waltz stated on Fox News Sunday that President Donald Trump decided to pause attacks to provide more time for diplomacy. According to Ole Hvalbye from SEB Research, both sides have not launched attacks since last Friday but have not reached any framework or verification mechanism nor set deadlines. On Monday, Trump announced that Washington is having “good talks” with Iran and that there is a possibility of resolving the conflict, noting again that U.S. attacks could resume if negotiations fail. Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Arakchi spoke separately by phone with Oman’s and Saudi Arabia’s counterparts, Badr Al-Busaid and Faisal bin Farhan, according to the Iranian news agency Mehr. The heads of diplomacy from Iran, Oman, and Saudi Arabia emphasized joint cooperation in establishing stability in the region and eliminating uncertainty in the Strait of Hormuz, as noted by Mehr. On Tuesday, Oman presented Iran with a proposal for establishing a common regional mechanism for managing the strait, including voluntary payments to Tehran, according to a regional source for Reuters. Oman received support from Gulf states for this plan, as noted by Reuters. However, Iran’s spokesperson for the military, Abolfazl Zolfaqari, stated on Tuesday that Tehran prohibits passage for all companies and countries that accept the suggestion of U.S. President Donald Trump to charge damages from the blockade using frozen Iranian assets. Traffic through Hormuz remains weak, but discussions between Oman and Iran have encouraged the market, according to analyst Giovanni Staunovo from UBS. Analysts from Commerzbank highlighted that the scale of the price drop is likely exaggerated and motivated solely by hope that the situation will improve. Goldman Sachs estimates that the price of Brent crude will stabilize around $80 per barrel by year-end if the Strait of Hormuz fully reopens by the fourth quarter, but new potential risks include disruptions in the Red Sea. Yemen’s Ansar Allah movement blocked Saudi ports in the Red Sea at the beginning of last week, citing the Saudi blockade of Yemen as justification. The group attacked several Saudi tankers in the Red Sea. Over the weekend, Saudi Arabia attacked Yemen’s port of Hudaydah, and Ansar Allah retaliated with attacks on refineries in Jannoub and Jazan, with a daily refining capacity of 400,000 barrels. The detour via the Suez Canal and around Africa takes approximately three times longer and costs nearly double, calculated at around $2.87 million, based on data from LSEG. Separate calculations by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) show that the price of a basket of crude oil from its members dropped $8.30 to $88.91 on Monday. The U.S. paused attacks on Iran to give space for negotiations, according to Mike Waltz, who did not disclose further details about the nature of these talks. Between Iran and the U.S., a lull in conflicts was recorded over the weekend. The Pentagon paused bombing after thirteen nights of increasingly intense attacks, and there were no reports of Iranian attacks on neighboring countries in the past two days. An unnamed senior official in Trump’s administration told Reuters on Saturday that the U.S. president has always been clear that he prefers diplomacy but also shows Iran what will happen if it does not approach the negotiating table seriously. An Iranian source on Sunday announced that Iran would also suspend attacks as long as the U.S. does so. The source stated that Iran’s approach remains "attack for attack": if attacks stop, Iran will also halt its operations. That message has already been conveyed to the United States, according to Reuters. However, the source emphasized that skepticism outweighs optimism regarding the suspension of attacks, noting that the prevailing view is that it is a tactical pause rather than genuine.
10 poročil
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)Državni / javniSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 80pred 3 dneviOman je predstavil iranski načrt za upravljanje Hormuškega pristanišča, ki vključuje zbiranje prostovoljnih naknad za prehod preko pristanišča. Načrt je bil predložen skupaj z drugimi zaljevskimi državami, ki bi lahko pomagali stabilizirati trgovino prek pristanišča, ki bi lahko povzročila ameriško-izraelski ratom proti Iranu. Iran je zaprl trgovino z tujimi državami po napadu 28. februarja, sporazum med ZDA in Iranom pa je bil deloma uspešen, vendar je propadel po tem, ko je Iran napadel tuje države.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek nevtralno opisuje političku situaciju oko upravljanja Hormuškim tjesnacem, objašnjavajući različni statice države (Oman, Iran, SAD). Nema jasno izražene strane ili jednostrane izvore informacija. Učestvujete i zapadni diplomati, što pokazuje balansiranost. Članek ne prikazuje niti ene poti
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately references Oman's proposal for voluntary payments for passage through the Strait of Hormuz, aligning closely with the AP report's information about diplomatic efforts and Iran's stance on controlling the strait.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article presents facts neutrally, focusing on the proposed solution without overtly favoring either side, though it leans slightly towards the diplomatic resolution angle.
Telegram.hrNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 88Objektivnost 65pred 9 dneviAmeriški predsednik Donald Trump je grozil, da bo Iran odmazdil orožje na ladji Hormuškom tjesnacu in da bo ZDA bombardirale iranske cilje, kot so mostovi ali elektrarne. To se je zgodilo po tem, ko so saudski naftni tankerji spremenili smer plovbe v Crvenem morju zaradi grožnje jemenskih hutiščanih Iranom. Ameriška vojska je bombardirala cilje v Iranu eno noč, kar je povzročilo eksplozije v Teheranu, Čharu in Bušehru. Iran trdi, da sovraži ameriške vojaške objekte in infrastrukturo v Bahrajnu, vendar tega niso potrdili mediji.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): Članek označuje Trumpovo grožnjo kot izraz političnega stava, ki kaže pristranost do ameriškega stališča. Uključuje citate Trumpa i maršala Rubia, ki so izraženi kritično do Irana, in označuje geopolitično situacijo in vojaške akcije SAD-a. Nema balansa između stran, već se naglašava Amerika
Zakaj dejstva (88): This article closely mirrors the AP report, accurately citing Trump's threat and the U.S. airstrike pattern. It includes additional context about Marco Rubio's comments and the Houthi rebels in Yemen, which align with the broader geopolitical narrative in the primary source. No major factual discrep
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'pobjesnio' (raged) and 'uništit ću im' (will destroy them), which leans into a confrontational tone. It frames the conflict as a direct confrontation between the U.S. and Iran, with limited mention of alternative perspectives.
tportalNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 3 dneviCene nafte na svetovnih trgih so se povečale po pogovorih med ZDA in Iranom čez vikend, kar je pokazalo optimizem glede možne rešitve konflikta. V Londonu je cena na trgu narasla na 86,55 dolarjev, medtem ko je na ameriškem trgu na 81,12 dolarja. Analitičari menijo, da je promet skozi Hormuški tesnac še vedno omejen, vendar pa so pogovori med Omanom in Iranom doprinesli spodbujanju trgov. Irska vojska je sprejela predlog brodov, ki sprejemajo ameriški predlog za blokado in plačilo iranskih sredstev. Vendar pa so spremembe v Crvenom morju, vključno z blokado in napadom, povzročile dodatno tveganje za promet.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Novice se osredotočajo na gospodarsko in politično situacijo nafte in mednarodnih diplomatskih poskusov, brez jasno izražene politične odločitve. Vrednosti so prenesene nevtralno, s naglaskom na različne perspektive (Amerika, Iran, Oman), in ne na eno stran. Nema jasno izražene odločitve na levi strani
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article mentions rising oil prices but does not directly reference the AP report's specific details about U.S. strikes, Trump's threats, or Iran's responses. However, it aligns with general context about the conflict affecting global markets.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'pobjesnio' (angry) when describing Trump's actions and frames the situation with a clear bias toward the U.S. position, lacking balance.
N1 HrvatskaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 5 dneviAmeriški predsednik Donald Trump je septembra 2026 začasno ustavil napad na Iran, da bi omogočil prostor za pogajanja, kar je objavil ameriški veleposlanik v Združenih narodih. Iran je tudi potrdil, da bo napad ustavil, vendar ga ne bo naredil. To je razlog za začasno prekinitev pogajanj med obema državama.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene obe strani situacije - Trumpova odločitev o prekinitvi napadov in pogojno prekinitev ognja v Iranu - ne da bi se odkrito izrekla v korist enega ali drugega. V članku so citati neimenovanih ameriških uradnikov in iranskih virov, ki zagotavljajo uravnotežene poglede na začasno ustavitev sovražnosti in dvomov.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports on Trump's pause in attacks and the diplomatic implications but lacks specific details from the AP report, such as the casualties and the exact nature of the attacks.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article presents the situation with a slight bias toward the U.S. position, emphasizing the pause in attacks while mentioning Iran's response without equal depth.
N1 HrvatskaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 3 dnevi Oman ima načrt za prehod skozi Hormuz: prostovoljno plačilo, Iran izgubi izključni nadzorOman je predstavil iranski načrt za upravljanje Hormuškega potoka, ki vključuje zbiranje prostovoljnih nagrad za prolaz brodova. Plan je predstavljen skupaj z zaljevskimi državami in lahko pomaga pri stabilizaciji trgovine skozi potek, ki bo poremeden z ameriško-izraelskim ratom proti Iranu. Iran je zatvorio potek za stranim brodom po napadu 28. februarja, sporazum med SAD in Iranom je bil delotvoren ali kratkotrajan. Iran želi nadzorovati potek iz Omana, vendar SAD išče vrnitev starega uvjeta svobodne trgovine. Predlog podjeta na sistem v Maleziji, kjer države južne obale odločajo o doprinosu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek nevtralno opisuje politične odnose med Omanom, Iranom in SAD, brez jasnih stranih naglaske. Čeprav govori o pomembnih geopolitičnih vprašanjih, besedilo ne preferira ene strani nad drugo, temveč ne spreminja stališča in ciljev vseh strani. Prav zaradi tega se šteje, da je blizu centra.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports on Trump's threats and the ongoing U.S. strikes but lacks specific details from the AP report, such as the casualties and the exact nature of the attacks.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article uses emotionally charged language like 'pobjesnio' (angry) when describing Trump's actions and frames the situation with a clear bias toward the U.S. position, lacking balance.
Jutarnji listNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 9 dneviAmeriški predsednik Donald Trump je grozil Iranu, da bo ZDA uničile večino elektrarne v vsakem trenutku, ko bodo Iranci odprli paljbu na krovu Hormuškega gorovja. To opozorilo prihaja po tem, ko je ZDA poročale o zračnem napadu na Iran, Iran pa je izstrelil projektil na jordanski grad Akabu blizu Izraela. Medtem so Bahrein in Savdska Arabija izdali opozorila o nevarnosti. Trump je ponovil svoje prejšnje grožnje o uničenju civilne infrastrukture kot odkup za iranski napad. Diplomatija med ZDA in Iranom ni pokazala napredka, medtem ko je Hormuški gorovj ključni morski morski ključ za globalni energetski sistem, zaprti zaradi nepredvidenih napadov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): Članek poudarja grožnje SAD proti Iranu, uporablja agresivne izraze, kot so "uništiti" in "spremeniti civilno infrastrukturo", kar kaže na pristranost do ameriške politike.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately summarizes the primary source document, including Trump's warning about destroying bridges or power plants for every Iranian attack in the Strait of Hormuz. It mentions the ongoing U.S. strikes and references the AP report. However, it adds some details not present in the orig
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'otvorena nova fronta' (new front opened) and 'ozbiljnu zabrinutost' (serious concern), which introduces a biased tone. It frames the situation as a new escalation rather than presenting a neutral account of events.
tportalNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 75pred 9 dnevi Trump grozi Iranu: "Za vsak napad v Hormuškem prelivu bomo uničili most ali elektrarno"Ameriški predsednik Donald Trump je zagrozil Iranu, da bo uničil ključno civilno infrastrukturo, vključno z mostovi in elektrarnami, za vsak napad na ladjo Hormuškom Tjesnacu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): Članek poudarja, da je Trumpova grožnja Iranu resna politična poteza, ki kaže pristranost do ameriškega položaja.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article correctly reports on Trump's pause in attacks and the diplomatic implications but lacks specific details from the AP report, such as the casualties and the exact nature of the attacks.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article presents the situation with a slight bias toward the U.S. position, emphasizing the pause in attacks while mentioning Iran's response without equal depth.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)Državni / javniSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 70pred 5 dnevi Trump je prekinil napade na Iran, da bi dal prostor za diplomacijo.Ameriški predsednik Donald Trump je po mnenju izvršnega uradnika Združenih narodov v nedeljo objavil odločitev, po kateri je Iran napovedal, da bo tudi napad preprečil, da bi se izognil napadu. Vendar pa iranski vir poudarja, da obstaja še nekaj besed o taktičnem premoru in ne o tem, da bi preprečil napad. Pentagon je po trinajstih noči napadov prekinil bombardiranje, v zadnjih dveh dneh pa niso poročali o iranskih napadih na sosednjo državo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Čeprav so napadi na Iran ustrezni reakciji na politično kontroverzne teme, članek nevtralno opisuje Trumpovo odločitev in iranski odziv brez očitnega tujega vpliva.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately reports on Trump's threats and the ongoing U.S. strikes but lacks specific details from the AP report, such as the casualties and the exact nature of the attacks.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article uses emotionally charged language like 'pobjesnio' (angry) when describing Trump's actions and frames the situation with a clear bias toward the U.S. position, lacking balance.
N1 HrvatskaNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 70pred 9 dnevi Rubio je poslal sporočilo Iranu: "Če ste resni, smo tudi mi resni.Ameriški državni sekretar Marco Rubio je napovedal, da bodo ZDA nadaljevale pogajanja z Iranom, vendar je sumil, da bo Teheran v tem procesu resno sodeloval. Pogovori so potekali v kontekstu napetosti v regiji, še posebej zaradi grožnje jemenskih hutišč, ki jih podpira Iran, ki ne zagotavlja prometa skozi Hormuški tesnac in Crveno more. Iran je predlagal desetdnevno napoved, kako bi zagotovil zasebno premierno, iranski minister za notranje zadeve pa je pozneje obiskal Pakistan kot posrednik. Rubi je poudaril, da bi nadzor nad Iranom nad Hormuškim tesnom ustvaril nevaren pritisk, ameriška vojska pa bo še naprej bombardirala cilje v Iranu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): Članek uporablja opis Irana kot neznanega partnerja v pogajanjih, s poudarkom na njegovem pomanjkanju resnosti. Primerjava z ZDA kot resnim partnerjem namiguje na pristranost. Prav tako opisuje potencialne posledice Iranskega nadzora nad Hormuškim tempom kot globalne nevarnosti predhodnega obdobja.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article correctly reports on the U.S. military actions and Trump's threats but lacks specific details from the AP report, such as the exact nature of the attacks or the casualties mentioned.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article uses strong language like 'pauzirao napade' (paused attacks) and frames the situation with a clear emphasis on U.S. military actions, showing some bias.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)Državni / javniSredinapred 7 urami Cene nafte nad 90 dolarjev, s poudarkom na podatkih o tranzitih ladijCena nafte na mednarodnem trgu je presegla 90 dolarjev, kar je prispevalo k nestabilnosti v globalni energetski situaciji. Povečanje cen je prišlo zaradi omejenega tranzita ladij skozi Hormuški trg po poslabšanju vojne med SAD in Iranom. Na londonskem trgu je cena dosegla 90,16 dolarjev, medtem ko je na ameriškem trgu bila 85,34 dolarjev. Iranska revolucionarna garda je ustavila dva tankerja, štiri pa so spremenili smjer. Teheranski nadzor tranzita, dve supertankeri z nafto so izšli iz Hormuške baze, vendar je promet še vedno omejen. Teheran je reagiral na ameriški napad na Kuvajc, ki je poklical Jemenski Ansar Allah in blokiral nekaj saudskih lukarjev.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Četudi so politične teme obravnavane, se članki osredotočajo na ekonomsko in geopolitično situacijo brez jasno opredeljenega strokovnega ali ideološkega pristopa.
Croatia
