United States🏛️ PolitikaBolj konservativnopred 5 urami
Trump obljublja, da bo za vsako iransko ladjo, ki jo napade Iran, udaril v most ali elektrarno.
Predsednik Donald Trump je napovedal novo grožnjo proti Iranu, ki navaja, da bodo ZDA uničile iranski most ali elektrarno za vsak napad, ki ga Iran sproži proti ladjam v Hormuškem prelivu. Ta izjava prihaja med stalnimi napetostmi med obema narodoma, ZDA pa razmišljajo o morebitnem prenehanju ognja in večji vojaški eskalaciji. Trump je poudaril, da bi prenehanje ognja zahtevalo, da Iran preneha napadati ladje in ponovno odpre Hormuški preliv, ki je bil delno zaprt zaradi nedavnih napadov.
The United States and Iran have paused their military strikes for a second consecutive day, marking a temporary halt in the escalating conflict that has gripped the Middle East. This pause follows a near-two-week cycle of attacks that targeted Iranian coastal areas and infrastructure, triggered initially by Iran’s attempts to disrupt shipping through the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. The move comes amid intensified diplomatic efforts aimed at preventing a broader war and restoring stability to the region. Meanwhile, Treasury yields have climbed to their highest levels since the start of the conflict in February, reflecting growing economic uncertainty tied to the situation. The U.S. military suspended its operations after a meeting with top advisers and military officials, who presented a revised strike plan. President Donald Trump had previously leaned toward resuming major combat actions but changed course, opting instead to give negotiations a chance. The decision to halt attacks was influenced by requests from regional mediators and countries in the area, who urged Trump to provide diplomacy a window to succeed. Trump emphasized that he would consider resuming aggressive military measures if talks failed to produce a deal. Diplomatic channels have become increasingly active, with mediators such as Qatar and Pakistan playing pivotal roles in facilitating dialogue between the U.S. and Iran. These efforts include discussions involving Oman, which shares a border with Iran along the Strait of Hormuz. Talks focus on establishing a framework for managing maritime traffic through the strait, potentially involving shared fees for services related to security and environmental protection. Some regional sources suggest that progress has been made, though no formal agreement has yet been reached. Iran, however, has maintained a firm stance, asserting that it controls the Strait of Hormuz and has no intention of engaging in negotiations with the United States, which it refers to as a “mafia gang.” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei denied claims that Iran is open to talks with the U.S., stating that the country is solely engaged in bilateral discussions with Oman. Despite this, regional officials have indicated that mediators have made significant strides in bridging the gap between the two nations. Public sentiment in the U.S. appears to favor a decisive approach toward Iran. A recent poll revealed that a majority of general election voters believe the U.S. must complete its objectives in Iran, including ensuring that Iran cannot acquire nuclear weapons. The survey highlighted widespread concern over Iran’s ability to block, attack, mine, or extort ships in the Strait of Hormuz, with 72 percent of respondents agreeing that such actions should not be tolerated. The pause in hostilities has had immediate effects on financial markets, with oil prices declining sharply after the initial escalation. West Texas Intermediate and Brent crude saw their largest one-day drops in two months, signaling relief among investors. However, the situation remains precarious, with concerns over the potential for renewed violence persisting. The U.S. military has reaffirmed its readiness to defend against Iranian threats, despite the temporary cessation of attacks. Efforts to reach a resolution continue, with U.S. President Trump scheduled to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu later in the week. Their discussion is expected to focus on the implications of the ongoing conflict and the necessity of maintaining pressure on Iran to prevent it from acquiring nuclear capabilities. The outcome of these talks could influence future strategies and decisions regarding the region’s stability. The situation in the Strait of Hormuz remains a focal point, with both Iran and the U.S. vying for control over the critical waterway. While Iran insists on its right to manage shipping through the strait, the U.S. continues to push for alternative routes that avoid Omani territory. The complexity of these negotiations underscores the delicate balance required to achieve a lasting solution. As the diplomatic process unfolds, the international community watches closely, aware that any miscalculation could reignite hostilities and destabilize the region further.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
Članek poroča, da so se cene plina v Združenih državah povečale, kar sovpada s povečanimi napetostmi med ZDA in Iranom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene informacije o naraščajočih cenah plina in napetosti med ZDA in Iranom, ne da bi se očitno naklonil nobeni strani.
Zakaj dejstva (100): This article does not discuss lithium or South America at all. It covers unrelated topics such as gas prices, wildfires, and political events. Since it doesn't address the primary source document, it cannot be judged for factual accuracy or faithfulness to it.
Zakaj objektivnost (100): The article presents multiple news segments without bias or opinion. It simply lists headlines and brief summaries of current events.
ZDA so začele zračne napade proti Iranu po smrti ameriškega pripadnika vojske v Iraku, kar je povečalo napetost med nadaljevanjem sovražnosti. Iran je odgovoril s streljanjem izstrelkov proti Jordaniji, kar je povzročilo zaskrbljenost zaradi regionalne eskalacije.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnoteženo poročilo o dejanjih ZDA in Irana, pri čemer navaja uradne izjave in vojaška poročila, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article provides a detailed account of the U.S. strikes on Iran, including specific locations and the impact on regional infrastructure, aligning closely with the primary source document.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, providing factual descriptions of the strikes and their effects without injecting personal opinion.
The HillNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85pred 8 dnevi
Ameriški minister za energetiko Chris Wright je izjavil, da bodo ZDA kljub obnovljenim sovražnostem med ZDA in Iranom še naprej zagotavljale neprekinjen pretok prometa skozi Hormuško ožino. V intervjuju za ABC News Jonathan Karl je Wright poudaril, da se administracija osredotoča na iskanje diplomatske rešitve za naraščajoče napetosti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja izjavo ameriškega uradnika glede napetosti z Iranom, vendar ne zavzema jasnega ideološkega stališča, temveč se osredotoča na zavezanost administracije k ohranjanju stabilnosti v strateško pomembni regiji, hkrati pa priznava možnost diplomatskega rešitve.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports the Energy Secretary's statement regarding the assurance of traffic flow through the Strait of Hormuz, which matches the primary source document. It provides specific quotes and context about the ongoing conflict, showing good alignment with the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone by quoting the Energy Secretary directly and presenting his statements without added commentary. It focuses on the practical implications of the conflict without taking a clear stance on either side.
The New York Times (World)Neodvisen🔒KonservativnoDejstva 88Objektivnost 82pred 5 dnevi
Predsednik Donald Trump je opozoril, da se bodo ZDA maščevale civilnim ciljem, vključno z infrastrukturo v Teheranu ali v njegovi bližini, če bi Iran napadel strateško pomemben Hormuški preliv.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je stališče ZDA označeno kot trdno in konfrontacijsko, poudarjajo pa se grožnje z maščevanjem in skeptičnost do iranskih diplomatskih namer.
Zakaj dejstva (88): The New York Times accurately reports Trump's threat as corroborated by other sources. It includes additional context about Secretary of State Marco Rubio's comments, which adds depth without contradicting the core factual claim.
Zakaj objektivnost (82): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting both Trump's threat and Rubio's assessment without taking sides. It avoids emotionally charged language and sticks to reporting the facts as presented.
Predsednik Donald Trump je izjavil, da se bodo ZDA maščevale proti Iranu z uničenjem mostu ali elektrarne za vsak napad, ki ga Iran izvede v Hormuškem prelivu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): Članek predstavlja neposredni citat predsednika Trumpa, ki je znan po svoji močni in pogosto sporni retoriki.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports Trump's statement as quoted by AP News, aligning with the cross-source consensus that he threatened retaliation against Iranian civilian infrastructure. No primary source is available, but multiple outlets report the same claim, supporting its factual basis.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article presents Trump's statement neutrally, focusing on the content of his remarks without overt emotional language or bias. However, it uses phrases like 'destroy' which may carry some weight, though overall remains objective.
The Washington TimesStrankarsko povezanKonservativnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 5 dnevi
Predsednik Donald Trump je opozoril, da bodo ZDA bombardirale iranske mostove in elektrarne, vključno s tistimi v Teheranu, če bo Iran še naprej napadal komercialne ladje v Hormuškem prelivu. Ta izjava prihaja med stalnimi napetostmi med ZDA in Iranom, kjer Iran trdi, da ima nekaj nadzora nad prometom nafte v regiji v skladu z nedavnim mirovnim sporazumom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je predstavljena agresivna retorika predsednika Trumpa do Irana, ki uporablja močan, militaristični jezik, kot je "bombardiranje in uničevanje", in prikazuje dejanja ZDA kot upravičene odgovore na iranske napade.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports Trump's threat to bomb Iranian infrastructure based on the primary source document. It accurately reflects the content of the original statement, though it does not directly quote the full text. It mentions the U.S. strike count and Iran's denial of nuclear activity, aligning wit
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting both sides of the conflict. It includes statements from Secretary of State Marco Rubio and acknowledges Iran's accusations of war crimes, maintaining a balanced perspective.
The Washington TimesStrankarsko povezanKonservativnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 6 dnevi
Iranski uradnik, minister za notranje zadeve Eskandar Momeni, je začel srečanja s pakistanskimi posredniki v Islamabadu kot del diplomatskih prizadevanj za oživitev propadlega začasnega dogovora med Iranom in Združenimi državami. Pogovori potekajo med nadaljevanjem sovražnosti, pri čemer obe državi že deseti dan zapored izvajajo napade.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je konflikt označen kot nadaljevanje prizadevanj ZDA za preprečevanje iranske agresije, poudarja pa se grožnja, ki jo predstavlja Iran, in podpira trdo linijsko stališče administracije.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reflects the ongoing attacks and the diplomatic efforts in Pakistan, matching the primary source. It mentions the impact on shipping and oil prices, which are consistent with the primary source. However, it slightly emphasizes the role of Pakistan as a mediator.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone is generally neutral, though it leans slightly towards presenting the situation as dire, particularly regarding the impact on oil prices and civilian infrastructure. There's a subtle emphasis on the humanitarian concerns.
Cene nafte so se na kratko umaknile od rekordnih višin, saj je Iran pokazal, da bi diplomatska prizadevanja še vedno lahko uspela, kar je v ponedeljek zgodaj zagotovilo nekaj olajšanja za trge z delnicami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pogled, saj poudarja tako geopolitične napetosti kot potencial za diplomatsko rešitev.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports that oil prices have risen above $90 and mentions the US has struck Iran nine days running. It also references Iran signaling that diplomacy remains possible, which pulled crude back from its highs. These statements align with typical reporting on geopolitical tensions and oil ma
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents information in a somewhat neutral tone but uses phrases like 'stocks are trying to hold' and 'Iran's signal that diplomacy remains possible' which can be interpreted as slightly biased toward market reactions rather than purely factual reporting. The focus on stock market respon
Diplomatski napori se nadaljujejo, medtem ko Iran in ZDA pospešujejo svoj konflikt, pri čemer Pakistan deluje kot posrednik. Kljub obnovljenim napadom na ladijske poti in regionalne zaveznike diplomati skušajo oživiti propadel začasni mirovni sporazum.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Čeprav članek poroča o zelo spornem geopolitičnem konfliktu med Iranom in ZDA, predstavlja informacije iz več pogledov, vključno z izjavami uradnikov obeh držav in pakistanskimi posredovalnimi prizadevanji.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately describes the attacks on Kuwait and the suspension of the interim deal, aligning with the primary source. It provides specific details about the damage and casualties, which are consistent with the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a balanced tone, reporting the events without apparent bias. It focuses on the factual outcomes of the attacks and the diplomatic implications without injecting strong opinions.
Predsednik Donald Trump je napovedal novo grožnjo proti Iranu, ki navaja, da bodo ZDA uničile iranski most ali elektrarno za vsak napad, ki ga Iran sproži proti ladjam v Hormuškem prelivu. Ta izjava prihaja med stalnimi napetostmi med obema narodoma, ZDA pa razmišljajo o morebitnem prenehanju ognja in večji vojaški eskalaciji. Trump je poudaril, da bi prenehanje ognja zahtevalo, da Iran preneha napadati ladje in ponovno odpre Hormuški preliv, ki je bil delno zaprt zaradi nedavnih napadov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku so predstavljene Trumpove agresivne vojaške grožnje proti Iranu z uporabo močnega, konfrontacijskega jezika, kot je "bombarduj in uniči", in poudarjeno je njegovo enostransko stališče, ne da bi zagotovili uravnotežene poglede Irana ali mednarodnih akterjev.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article discusses the Security Council meeting and Syrian situation, which is tangential to the main event described in the primary source document. It lacks direct reference to the US-Iran conflict.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article covers a different geopolitical issue, so it doesn't present a strong opinion on the US-Iran conflict, but it's less relevant to the primary source.
The New York Times (World)Neodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 75pred 7 dnevi
Državni sekretar Marco Rubio je izjavil, da so ZDA kljub napetosti med obema narodoma še vedno odprte za diplomatsko sodelovanje z Iranom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljena izjava državnega sekretarja Marco Rubija o ameriško-iranski diplomaciji, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately reports that the U.S. remains open to diplomacy with Iran and that Iran has expressed interest in negotiating. This aligns with other reports suggesting both sides have not completely closed off the possibility of talks.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article is generally neutral but slightly leans toward the U.S. position by emphasizing the openness of the U.S. to diplomacy without providing equal emphasis on Iran’s motivations or constraints.
Članek poroča, da se donosnost državnih obveznic približuje najvišjim nivojem od februarja, ko se je začela vojna z Iranom, zaradi naraščajočih cen nafte in povečanih možnosti za zvišanje obrestne mere Zvezne rezerve.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja informacije o trendih na finančnih trgih, povezanih z geopolitičnimi dogodki in politikami centralnih bank, ne da bi očitno zagovarjal katero koli določeno politično stališče, temveč se osredotoča na objektivne gospodarske kazalnike in ne na jasno ideološko stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article states that the bull market faces a higher likelihood of a Fed rate hike due to the intensifying Iran crisis. It mentions Treasury yields approaching levels since the Iran war began in February. While these correlations are commonly observed in financial markets, the direct causal link b
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article frames the situation in a way that emphasizes potential economic consequences, using terms like 'higher likelihood of a Fed rate hike' which implies a strong connection between the Iran crisis and monetary policy. This framing leans towards a financial perspective, potentially downplayin
Predsednik Donald Trump je opozoril, da bodo ZDA "bombardirale in uničile" most ali elektrarno v Iranu, če bo ta država "streljala na ladjo v Hormuškem prelivu". Po poročanju BBC News je opozorilo prišlo po tem, ko so ZDA 11. noč zapored izstrelile napade na Iran. Trump je tudi omenil, da bi lahko potencialni prihodnji cilj bil podzemni jedrski kompleks v Iranu, imenovan Pickaxe Mountain.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku so Trumpova opozorila označena kot neposredna grožnja Iranu, poudarjajo pa njegovo močno retoriko in vojaško eskalacijo.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately quotes Trump's statements about bombing bridges or power plants and references the primary source document about the 11th consecutive night of strikes. It also mentions Pickaxe Mountain as a potential target, aligning with the primary source. However, it lacks some of the deta
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The tone is more alarmist, using phrases like 'unwarranted attacks' and emphasizing the threat to commercial shipping. This suggests a somewhat biased perspective, focusing on the risks posed by Iran rather than presenting a balanced view of the situation.
Iranski minister za notranje zadeve Eskandar Momeni je v torek obiskal Pakistan, da bi se srečal s predsednikom vlade Shehbazom Sharifom in glavnim poljnim maršalom Asimom Munirjem v času napetosti med Iranom in Združenimi državami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je stališče ZDA označeno kot bolj trdno in kritično do Irana, pri čemer se navajajo zavrhujoče izjave predsednika Trumpa o obupu Irana za pogajanja.
Zakaj dejstva (78): The article accurately reports that Iranian Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni met with Pakistani leaders, aligning with the primary source. However, it adds speculative elements such as the claim that Pakistan 'may well have been the unnamed mediator' suggesting a ten-day ceasefire, which is not exp
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The tone leans towards portraying Pakistan as a proactive mediator and highlights the relationship between Field Marshal Munir and Trump, which could be seen as biased. The article uses phrases like 'apparently hoping' and 'intensified its efforts,' which suggest a narrative rather than neutrality.
Predsednik Trump je med srečanjem z predsednikom Libanona napovedal, da bo ameriška vojska kmalu bombardirala iransko goro Pickaxe, podzemno območje, kjer naj bi se nahajala jedrska infrastruktura. Tramp je trdil, da ZDA in Izrael verjamejo, da je Iran morda tam shranil centrifuge, čeprav to ni bilo potrjeno v zapisniku. Poudaril je, da ZDA ne iščejo premirja in se premikajo proti povečanju vojaških ukrepov proti Iranu. Trump je izključil obnovljene diplomatske pogovore z Iranom, ko je dejal, da država "še ni videla ničesar". Vlada naj bi preučevala dve poti: kratkoročno premirje za ponovno odprtje Ormuškega preliva ali obsežno vojaško operacijo z Izraelom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku se Trumpovo agresivno stališče do Irana prikazuje kot odločen in potreben vojaški ukrep, z uporabo močnega jezika, kot je "to območje bomo zelo močno udarili" in poudarjanje ZDA kot agresorja.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article accurately reports Trump's statement about bombing Pickaxe Mountain, citing the Wall Street Journal for additional context. However, it omits details from the primary source about the broader conflict, including Iran's warnings, the activation of defenses in Tehran, and the geopolitical
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The tone leans slightly towards portraying Trump's actions as aggressive and the potential for escalation, though it remains relatively neutral. The article frames the situation as a strategic decision by Trump, which may subtly imply a lack of willingness to de-escalate.
Predsednik Donald Trump je izjavil, da obstaja "dobra možnost" za dosego dogovora z Iranom za reševanje napetosti na Bližnjem vzhodu, čeprav je opozoril, da bi se vojaški konflikt lahko nadaljeval, če pogajanja ne uspejo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja Trumpovo izjavo, ne da bi odkrito podprl ali kritiziral njegov položaj.
Predsednik Trump je med intervjujem z Axiosom izjavil, da je ustavil ameriške vojaške napade na Iran, da bi omogočil nadaljevanje tekočih pogajanj, vendar je opozoril, da bo nadaljeval močne vojaške ukrepe, če diplomatski napori ne bodo uspeli. Cilj pogajanj je ponovno odpreti Hormuški preliv in oživiti razprave o celovitem jedrskem sporazumu, ki vključuje Iran in Oman, s podporo Katarja, Pakistana, Egipta in ameriških odposlancev. Trump je poudaril, da je bila prekinitev zahtevana s strani regionalnih posrednikov in zaveznikov, in je opozoril, da je ta odločitev omogočila stabilizacijo cen nafte in dvig borze. Medtem ko regionalni viri kažejo na nekaj napredka v pogovorih med Omanom in Iranom, še ni bil dosežen noben uradni sporazum. Razprave vključujejo potencialne modele za upravljanje pomorskega prometa skozi Hormuški preliv, kot je zaračunavanje razumnih pristojbin za varnost in varstvo okolja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja stališče predsednika Trumpa o vojaških dejanjih in diplomaciji z nevtralnostjo, citira njegove izjave neposredno, ne da bi odprto kritizirali ali hvalili njegovo stališče.
Tiskovni predstavnik iranskega ministrstva za zunanje zadeve Esmail Baghaei je trdil, da Iran ohranja popoln nadzor nad Hormuškim prelivom in nima namena sodelovati v pogajanjih z ZDA, ki jih je primerjal z "mafijsko tolpo". Zanikal je trditve, da je Iran zahteval pogajanja, in takšne poročila imenoval izmišljene. Baghaei je dejal, da ZDA niso vključene v tekoče pogovore med Iranom in Omanom glede upravljanja pomorskega prometa skozi preliv, ki ga je opisal kot dvostransko vprašanje. Vendar pa so regionalni uradniki poročali, da so posredniki v Katarju in Pakistanu napredovali pri spodbujanju obnovljenih pogovorov med Iranom in ZDA, kar je v nasprotju z Baghaeijevimi trditvami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku so ZDA označene kot "mafijska tolpa" in Iran prikazan kot legitimna oblast nad Ormuško ožino, z uporabo močnega negativnega jezika do ZDA. Medtem ko predstavlja iranske in zunanje perspektive, poudarek na nezakonitosti ZDA in prikaz Irana kot suverenega,
Nafte so se v dveh mesecih po odločitvi ZDA, da ustavi napade na Iran, v enem dnevu močno znižale. To je privedlo do padca pogodb za surovo nafto West Texas Intermediate in Brent. Zdi se, da je prekinitev sovražnosti med ZDA in Iranom vplivala na tržno razpoloženje, zaradi česar so trgovci reagirali s prodajo naftnih terminskih pogodb.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljen preprost poročilo o gibanju cen nafte, ki je povezano z geopolitičnimi ukrepi, brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja.
Anketa Tea Party Patriots Action, ki jo je izvedla McLaughlin & Associates in ekskluzivno delila z Breitbart Newsom, razkriva, da se 72% volivcev na splošnih volitvah strinja, da Iranu ne bi smelo biti dovoljeno blokirati, napadati, rudariti ali izsiljevati ladij v Hormuškem prelivu. Anketa poudarja zaskrbljenost zaradi dejanj Irana, ki motijo kritične ladijske poti, bistvene za globalno energijo in trgovino, kar vodi do višjih stroškov za potrošnike. Poleg tega 62% anketirancev podpira, da ZDA končajo delo z Iranom, da bi preprečili pridobitev jedrskega orožja in ogrožanje ameriških življenj.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je vprašanje postavljeno skozi pro-vojaško, nacionalno varnostno lečo, s poudarkom na nujnosti ameriške intervencije v Iranu.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
United States
![[EDITORIAL] Ang patlang sa retoriko at realidad ni Pangulong Marcos](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=newsinfo.inquirer.net%2Ffiles%2F2026%2F07%2FTULFO_ULET.mp4.00_03_26_16.Still001.png&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
