ON
🔍Prijava
← Nazaj na pregled
Svoboda govora na kampusu je dosegla 20-letni vrhunec pod Trumpovo administracijo
United States🏛️ PolitikaBolj konservativnopred 8 urami

Svoboda govora na kampusu je dosegla 20-letni vrhunec pod Trumpovo administracijo

Pod Trumpovo administracijo so univerze po Združenih državah zmanjšale omejevalne govorne kode, po podatkih Fundacije za posamezne pravice v izobraževanju (FIRE). Organizacija je poročala, da je 66 šol, ali 13,2% vseh institucij, imelo ocene "rdeče luči" za politike, ki omejujejo svobodo govora, kar je zmanjšanje v primerjavi s prejšnjimi leti. To sledi trendu upadanja omejitev od Bidenove administracije. Medtem je 76 šol, ali 15,4%, dobilo "zeleno luč", ker nima omejitev na pravice prvega amandmaja, kar je drugo leto zapored, ko je več šol dobilo zeleno oceno kot rdečo. FIRE pripisuje ta premik pritisku državnih zakonodajnih organov, ponovni izvolitvi Donalda Trumpa in spremembam v zveznih politikah. Vendar pa je 342 šol še vedno dobilo "rumeno luč" za ohranjanje nejasnih politik, ki bi lahko omejevale govor. Nekatere univerze, vključno z Clarkom v Washingtonu, so izboljšale ocene z revizijo svojih politik.

Campus free speech has reached a 20-year high under the Trump administration, according to a report released by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE). The organization, based in Philadelphia, noted a record-low number of universities with restrictive speech policies, marking a reversal of the trend observed under the previous administration. According to FIRE's latest assessment, 66 institutions, 13.2% of all colleges, received a "red light" rating for policies that restrict protest, speaking events, and online discourse. This represents a decline of 1.5 percentage points compared to the previous year and continues a downward trajectory from two consecutive years of increases under President Joe Biden. Simultaneously, FIRE awarded 76 schools, a total of 15.4% of 493 institutions surveyed, with a "green light" for having no limits on First Amendment rights. This figure rose from 73 the prior year, indicating the second consecutive year in which green-lighted schools outnumbered those with red lights. FIRE senior program counsel Ryan Ansloan attributed the shift to pressures from state legislatures, the re-election of Donald Trump, and subsequent federal investigations, lawsuits, and changes in research funding. He emphasized the hope that this trend would lead to stronger support for free speech during campus controversies. Since FIRE began rating university speech codes in 2006, only 2.4% of schools received a green light, while 97.6% were rated yellow or red. This year, another 342 schools, 69.4% of all campuses, were given a yellow light for retaining vague policies. Among these, 10 schools moved from red to yellow after collaborating with FIRE to reduce restrictions. These include Clark University, Colgate University, and the University of Washington, among others. Three additional schools, University of Alabama, University of West Florida, and University of California, Davis, improved from yellow to green. The nonprofit also highlighted that 120 schools have endorsed a 2015 statement from the University of Chicago faculty advocating for radical free expression. However, responses to the report varied among higher education analysts. Jonathan Zimmerman, an education history professor at the University of Pennsylvania, noted that campuses have rolled back some restrictions imposed during the 2023-2024 academic year, partly due to the elimination of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) offices. Yet, he warned that the Trump administration has introduced new constraints on speech through executive orders related to race and gender. Timothy Cain, a University of Georgia higher education professor, argued that free expression faces greater challenges under the Trump administration, citing increased pressure from conservative lawmakers to limit race and gender-related teachings. He claimed that classroom speech is being constrained by reactionary legislation, leading to book bans and curriculum changes driven by partisan motives rather than educational goals. Both the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Georgia retained yellow lights for maintaining vague speech policies that could suppress expression. Despite the overall positive trend, three schools fell from yellow to red ratings in FIRE's report: Bard College, Tulane University, and SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry. FIRE has criticized these institutions for enforcing subjective standards of "civility" in debate, which could hinder open discussion. Meanwhile, tensions over free speech extended beyond university campuses. In Nashville, a newly opened bookstore canceled a book launch for a Jewish author after an online campaign accused the store of promoting Zionism. Bell Bird Books, which had planned to host Alyssa Rosenheck on August 20, faced backlash over her upcoming book discussing antisemitism and her experiences in Israel and areas near the Gaza border following the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023. The store owner, Rachel Weprin, stated that the cancellation was due to security concerns rather than the content of the book or the author's identity. Rosenheck, a founding member of Artists Against Antisemitism, assured readers that refunds would be issued and that a new event would be organized. In another instance, a federal appeals court ruled that a public school counselor in Oregon violated hate speech legislation by displaying children's books affirming the gender binary. The books, "He is He" and "She is She," co-authored by Ryan Bomberger, were deemed unprotected under the First Amendment. Bomberger, who described the books as celebrating traditional gender roles, argued that the ruling sets a dangerous precedent. He criticized the school district for promoting materials he considered discriminatory against the nuclear family and against scientific principles. Legal battles continue to test the boundaries of free speech. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon urged pro-Israel college students to differentiate between protected speech and actionable discriminatory conduct when confronting antisemitism. She emphasized the importance of identifying situations where individuals interfere with students' ability to receive an education, rather than merely expressing controversial opinions. Her remarks were delivered at the Israel on Campus Coalition's National Leadership Summit in Washington. These developments underscore the complex landscape of free speech in contemporary America, where legal interpretations, societal pressures, and institutional policies intersect to shape the contours of expression in educational and public spheres.

Pojdite k primarnim virom (23)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

10 poročil

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesStrankarsko povezanKonservativnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 95predvčerajšnjim
Svoboda govora na kampusu je dosegla 20-letni vrhunec pod Trumpovo administracijo

Pod Trumpovo administracijo so univerze po Združenih državah zmanjšale omejevalne govorne kode, po podatkih Fundacije za posamezne pravice v izobraževanju (FIRE). Organizacija je poročala, da je 66 šol, ali 13,2% vseh institucij, imelo ocene "rdeče luči" za politike, ki omejujejo svobodo govora, kar je zmanjšanje v primerjavi s prejšnjimi leti. To sledi trendu upadanja omejitev od Bidenove administracije. Medtem je 76 šol, ali 15,4%, dobilo "zeleno luč", ker nima omejitev na pravice prvega amandmaja, kar je drugo leto zapored, ko je več šol dobilo zeleno oceno kot rdečo. FIRE pripisuje ta premik pritisku državnih zakonodajnih organov, ponovni izvolitvi Donalda Trumpa in spremembam v zveznih politikah. Vendar pa je 342 šol še vedno dobilo "rumeno luč" za ohranjanje nejasnih politik, ki bi lahko omejevale govor. Nekatere univerze, vključno z Clarkom v Washingtonu, so izboljšale ocene z revizijo svojih politik.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): Članek poudarja zmanjšanje omejitev govora pod Trumpovo administracijo in poudarja vlogo zveznih politik in izvršnih ukrepov pri vplivanju na govor na kampusu.

Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports on the increase in campus free speech protections under the Trump administration, citing data from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. It provides specific statistics and quotes from the organization's representative, aligning closely with the primary

Zakaj objektivnost (95): The article remains neutral in tone, presenting the findings of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression without taking sides. It uses factual language and avoids emotional or biased phrasing, maintaining a high level of objectivity.

The Daily Wire logoThe Daily WireNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 85pred 6 dnevi
Arabsko-ameriška skupina izpodbija zakon o boju proti antisemitizmu v javnih šolah.

Zvezni sodnik v Kaliforniji je zavrnil tožbo, ki je izpodbijala nov zakon države, namenjen boju proti antisemitizmu v javnih šolah, s čimer je pravno izpodbijanje učinkovito končano. Ameriško-arabski odbor proti diskriminaciji, ki zastopa starše, učitelje, študente in skupino Los Angeles Educators for Palestine, je trdil, da zakon krši pravice prvega amandmaja. Vendar je sodnik Noël Wise razsodil, da so bili argumenti tožnikov prej zavrnjeni in so bili v veliki meri reciklirani. Zakon, ki je veljal od 1. januarja, je ustanovil koordinatorja za preprečevanje antisemitizma v Uradu za državljanske pravice in uvedel smernice za obravnavanje diskriminacije v razredih K-12.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je zavrnitev tožbe označena kot zmaga za zakon, ki je usmerjen proti antisemitizmu, poudarja pa je sodnik zavrnil argumente tožnikov in podporo zagovornikov zakona.

Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports the key facts from the primary source document, including the dismissal of the lawsuit, the role of Judge Noël Wise, the arguments presented by the plaintiffs, and the reference to companion legislation SB 48. It aligns closely with the official details provided.

Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article presents the information in a neutral tone, focusing on the legal arguments and court rulings without injecting personal opinion or emotional language. It provides a balanced summary of the case without apparent bias.

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesStrankarsko povezanSredinaDejstva 94Objektivnost 88včeraj
Knjižnica v Nashvillu prekliče izdajo knjige judovskega avtorja zaradi bojkotiranja.

Knjižnica Bell Bird Books je odpovedala načrtovano predstavitev knjige za judovsko avtorico Alysso Rosenheck, potem ko je bila na spletu kritizirana zaradi obtožb, da trgovina spodbuja cionizem. Rosenheckova knjiga "White. Blonde. Jew" razpravlja o antisemitizmu in njenih izkušnjah v Izraelu in Gazi po napadu Hamasa 7. oktobra 2023.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni oba stališča, Rosenheckova trditev o cenzuri in razlaga knjigarne o varnostnih pomislekih, ne da bi se očitno zavzemala za katero koli stran.

Zakaj dejstva (94): The article accurately reports the cancellation of the book launch, the reasons given by both parties, and includes direct quotes from Rosenheck and Weprin. It cites the Algemeiner as a source and aligns closely with the primary document. Minor discrepancies include the exact date of the event cance

Zakaj objektivnost (88): The article presents the situation neutrally, quoting both sides and avoiding overt bias. It uses objective language like 'online pressure campaign' and 'heightened security concerns.' However, it slightly leans towards emphasizing the free speech angle, which could be seen as a subtle framing choic

ABC News (US) logoABC News (US)NeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 8 dnevi
eBay je pristal na plačilo skoraj 50 milijonov $ za par, ki je poslal ščurke, krvavo prašičjo masko

eBay Inc. je privolil, da bo plačal skoraj 50 milijonov dolarjev paru iz Massachusettsa, Davidu in Ina Steinerju, ki sta trdila, da sta jih bivša zaposlena podjetja ogrožala z grožnjami in bizarnimi anonimnimi dostavami, vključno z živimi žuželkami, pogrebnim vencem in krvavo prašičjo masko za noč čarovnic, kot del kampanje nadlegovanja.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejstva v primeru nevtralno, navaja tako trditve, ki jih je Steiners in odgovore eBay. Izogiba se zavzemanje stališča o tem, ali so obtožbe resnične ali lažne, osredotoča se na pravni postopek in izide.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports that eBay agreed to pay nearly $50 million to the couple, which differs significantly from the primary source document stating a settlement amount was not disclosed. It mentions specific items like live insects, a funeral wreath, and a bloody pig mask, which aligns with the AP ar

Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is somewhat sensational, using phrases like 'bizarre anonymous deliveries' and emphasizing the impact on free speech. While not overtly biased, it frames the situation as a significant victory for the couple, potentially influencing reader perception.

TechCrunch logoTechCrunchNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 65pred 8 dnevi
eBay je dosegel poravnavo v višini 56 milijonov dolarjev s pisci e-trgovine, ki jih je teroriziral leta 2019

eBay je dosegel poravnavo v višini 56 milijonov dolarjev z Ino in Davidom Steinerjem, poročenim parom in soavtorjema EcommerceBytes, ki sta bili v letu 2019 izpostavljeni ciljni kampanji nadlegovanja nekdanjih vodilnih oseb eBay. Nadlegovanje je vključevalo napade na družabnih omrežjih, anonimne grožnje in bizarne pošiljke po pošti, kot so žive pajke, pornografske revije in krvava prašičja maska.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis pravnih in etičnih posledic kampanje nadlegovanja proti Steinersovim. Poroča o dejanjih eBayja in njegovih nekdanjih zaposlenih ter o poznejših obsodbah in odškodninah podjetja.

Zakaj dejstva (80): This article states a $56 million settlement, which conflicts with the AP article's mention of a $3 million criminal penalty and undisclosed settlement. It provides detailed descriptions of the harassment tactics, matching the primary source. However, it introduces specific figures from former execu

Zakaj objektivnost (65): The language is emotionally charged, describing the harassment as 'horrific' and focusing on the personal impact on the couple. The emphasis on the 'most bizarre episode in e-commerce history' suggests a narrative angle rather than purely factual reporting.

The Daily Wire logoThe Daily WireNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 75Objektivnost 65pred 5 dnevi
Šolski okrožji so izbrali napačnega očeta, da utiša zastave ponosa.

Oče v Michiganu, Gary Shane Pruitt, je uspešno izpodbijal nalog šolskega okrožja, ko je kritiziral prikaz pravega pravega pra pravega pravega pra pravega pravega pravega pra pra pra pravega pra pra pra pravega pra pra pravega pra pra pravega pra pra pra pra pravega pra pra pra pravega pravega pra pra pra pravega pravega pravega pra pra pravega pra pra pravega pra pra pra pravega pra pra pravega pra pra pravega pra pra pra pra pravega pra pravega pra pra pra pra pravega pra pravega pra pra pra pra pravega pravega pravega pra pra

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je očetova kritika pravega izražanja legitimna, medtem ko je dejanja šolskega okrožja prikazana kot pretirana in neustavna.

Zakaj dejstva (75): The article references a Michigan case involving a father challenging a school's Pride flag policy but omits key details from the primary source. It invents elements like the school board member's sarcastic response and the father's specific criticisms, which are not explicitly stated in the origina

Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article exhibits strong ideological bias, using terms like 'huge win for parental rights' and 'groomer teachers' to frame the case. It presents the situation as a clear victory for free speech without acknowledging potential counterarguments or nuances.

The Daily Wire logoThe Daily WireNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 30pred 6 dnevi
V notranjosti spletke eBay, da bi terorizirali par z živimi pajki in ščurki.

David in Ina Steiner iz Massachusettsa sta poročala, da ju je nekdanji vodja eBay-ja v letu 2019 nadlegoval s pošiljanjem grozečih paketov, ki so vsebovali žive pajke, ščurke in druge moteče predmete, pa tudi s poskusi, da bi z pornografijo in spletnimi grožnjami pokvarili njihov ugled. Nadlegovanje naj bi izhajalo iz kritičnega poročanja o poslovnih praksah eBay-ja, vključno z razkritji o visokih zaslužkih bivšega izvršnega direktorja Devina Weniga v primerjavi s povprečnimi zaposlenimi. Po dolgi pravni bitki, ki je trajala več kot desetletje, je par zmagal v tožbi, kar je privedlo do poravnave v višini 50 milijonov dolarjev. eBay je soglasen plačati 46,15 milijona dolarjev, medtem ko so nekdanji vodje Devin Wenig, Wendy Jones in Steve Wymer prispevali dodatne zneske. Podjetje je obljubilo tudi 6 milijonov dolarjev v neprofitne donacije eBay-ju.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Medtem ko incident vključuje korporativno vedenje in morebitne regulativne posledice, članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis zahtevkov tožnikov in odziva eBay-ja.

Zakaj dejstva (75): The article presents a detailed account of the harassment campaign against the Steiners, including specific allegations such as receiving live spiders, cockroaches, and threats. However, it does not directly reference the eBay press release or the primary source document, leading to potential inaccu

Zakaj objektivnost (30): The tone of the article is highly sensational and emotionally charged, using phrases like 'twisted plot' and 'terrorize.' It frames the situation as a deliberate campaign by eBay to intimidate the Steiners, which may not be fully supported by the primary source. The language lacks neutrality and app

The Daily Wire logoThe Daily WireNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 70Objektivnost 60predvčerajšnjim
Kako se ta konzervativna pisateljica bori proti resnični prepovedi knjige

Zvezno pritožbeno sodišče je odločilo, da je svetovalec javne šole v Oregonu prekršil zakone o sovražnem govoru, ko je prikazal otroške knjige "On je on" in "Ona je ona", ki potrjujejo spolno binarnost.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je prepoved knjige označena kot kršitev svobode govora in kritizirana politika šolskega okrožja kot hinavska in diskriminatorna.

Zakaj dejstva (70): The article references the Oregon school counselor case but mischaracterizes the court's ruling. It incorrectly states that the court ruled the books constituted 'hate speech,' which is not mentioned in the primary source. The article also invents details about the books' authors and their perspecti

Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article takes a clear ideological stance, using emotionally charged language like 'unreasonable ruling' and 'fighting a real book ban.' It frames the case as a battle between conservative values and perceived censorship, showing significant bias.

Reason logoReasonStrankarsko povezanSredinapred 8 urami
Harmeet Dhillon o razlikovanju med varovanim govorom in ukrepanim diskriminatornim ravnanjem

Pomočnica generalnega pravobranilca Harmeet Dhillon je v govoru na vrhu nacionalnega vodstvenega vrha koalicije Israel on Campus obravnavala razliko med zaščiteno besedo in diskriminatornim ravnanjem. Poudarila je, da so izrazi, kot so nošenje kefije ali skandiranje "od reke do morja", zaščiteni v skladu s prvim amandmajem, dejanja, kot je držanje rdečega trikotnika in razglasitev "Židje niso dobrodošli" v skupinskem okolju pa predstavljajo diskriminatorno vedenje. Dhillon je opozarjala, da se nesramne pripombe ne smejo združiti z vmešavanjem v izobraževanje.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek obravnava politično občutljivo vprašanje, povezano s svobodo govora in diskriminacijo, vendar je njegov okvir uravnotežen.

Reason logoReasonStrankarsko povezanSredinapred 10 urami
Nehaj govoriti z mano proti nekdanjemu najemodajalcu, ki je nekdanjemu stanovalcu pošiljal sporočila o cepivih proti COVID-u

V primeru Gonda proti Dueringu, ki ga je odločilo sredinsko pritožbeno sodišče na Havajih, je Anaya Gonda zahtevala prepoved približevanja proti svojemu nekdanjemu najemodajalcu, Michaelu Dueringu, ki jo je domnevno nadlegoval z več kot 25 besedilnimi sporočili, v katerih je razpravljal o svojih prepričanjih o negativnih učinkih cepiva COVID na njeno zdravje.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljen pravni primer, ki vključuje osebne trditve o nadlegovanju in ustavne pravice, povezane s svobodo govora.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe

Domenico je umrl.

Domenico je umrl.

Sredina4 viripred 5 urami
Blanche je pripravljena na potrditev glasovanja, potem ko je ubil Trumpov sklad.

Blanche je pripravljena na potrditev glasovanja, potem ko je ubil Trumpov sklad.

Sredina17 viripred 5 urami
Nicki Minaj predvideva hudo usodo za Faucija po zaslišanju v senatu

Nicki Minaj predvideva hudo usodo za Faucija po zaslišanju v senatu

Bolj konservativno23 viripred 5 urami
Sandiganbayan zavrača zahtevo varuha človekovih pravic, da Bonoan izključi iz zadeve o nadzoru poplav

Sandiganbayan zavrača zahtevo varuha človekovih pravic, da Bonoan izključi iz zadeve o nadzoru poplav

Sredina2 viripred 1 min.
[EDITORIAL] Ang patlang sa retoriko at realidad ni Pangulong Marcos

[EDITORIAL] Ang patlang sa retoriko at realidad ni Pangulong Marcos

Sredina3 viripred 1 uro
Številke, ki so upravičile oceno 7. oktobra, so svetovale CMHR, da je razstava v Nakbi, B'nai Brith ugotovi - ekskluzivno

Številke, ki so upravičile oceno 7. oktobra, so svetovale CMHR, da je razstava v Nakbi, B'nai Brith ugotovi - ekskluzivno

Bolj konservativno1 virpred 1 uro