ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Cayetano, ne Marcos, je kriv za neuspešno pomoč v višini 10.000 P. Palace
PH🏛️ PolitikaSredinapred 11 urami

Cayetano, ne Marcos, je kriv za neuspešno pomoč v višini 10.000 P. Palace

Filipinska predsedniška palača je zanikala trditev senatorja Alana Petra Cayetana, da je predsednik Ferdinand Marcos Jr. blokiral svoj predlagani program denarne pomoči v višini 10.000 P za vsako filipinsko družino. Po besedah podsekretarja Claire Castro, je propad predloga ležal pri samem Cayetanu, ki je uvedel ukrep, preden je Marcos prevzel funkcijo, in ga ni napredoval, ko je služil v kongresu. Palača je poudarila, da bi bil predlog, če bi bil izvedljiv, vključen v nacionalni proračun za leto 2022, ki je bil odobren, preden je Marcos postal predsednik. Castro je tudi ugotovil, da celo nekdanji predsednik Rodrigo Duterte, politični zaveznik Cayetana, ni bil prepričan o načrtu.

Manila, Philippines, The Philippine government has refuted claims by Senator Alan Peter Cayetano that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. blocked his proposal for a P10,000 cash assistance program for every Filipino family. According to palace officials, the failure of the initiative lies with Cayetano's own actions rather than any obstruction from the president. During a press briefing held on July 20, 2026, Undersecretary Claire Castro stated that there was no basis for Marcos to have rejected the proposal since Cayetano had already submitted the measure prior to the president taking office. This assertion comes in response to Cayetano's recent allegations that Marcos had refused to support his plan for universal financial aid. Castro emphasized that the responsibility for the stalled proposal rests squarely on Cayetano. She pointed out that the senator had previously made similar promises while serving in Congress, yet none of these initiatives had progressed beyond the initial stages. “Senator Alan Cayetano’s shortcomings, his slow pace and inability to fulfill his promises, should not be blamed on others,” Castro remarked. To back her claims, Castro presented several newspaper articles from 2021 and 2022, which detailed Cayetano's early advocacy for the cash aid program. These documents highlighted that the proposal had been introduced well before Marcos assumed the presidency. “If a proposal is beneficial and feasible, there’s no reason it can’t be passed. And when the 2022 national budget was approved, President Marcos Jr. wasn't even President yet,” she noted. Furthermore, Castro criticized Cayetano for not fully believing in his own proposal. She suggested that even former President Rodrigo Duterte, who is considered a political ally of Cayetano, seemed skeptical about the feasibility of the P10,000 aid package. “It seems he doesn’t even believe in his own proposed bill, and it appears he hasn’t studied it thoroughly, because he’s asking for around P200 billion,” Castro said. In a separate communication via Viber, Castro accused Cayetano of spreading unfounded narratives. She argued that instead of accepting accountability for his lack of progress, the senator was deflecting blame onto others to avoid embarrassment. “Why can’t Sen. Alan Cayetano stop himself from stirring up intrigue and peddling baseless stories? Instead of acknowledging his own negligence in his duties, he points fingers at others just to save himself from embarrassment. He passes the work he fails to accomplish onto other people,” she wrote. Cayetano has faced criticism from various quarters for his handling of legislative proposals. Earlier this year, Senator Bongbong Marcos, the president's son, had called for greater accountability among lawmakers regarding their commitments. Meanwhile, some members of the opposition have expressed concern over the potential impact of unfulfilled campaign promises on public trust in the political process. The controversy surrounding the P10,000 aid proposal underscores broader issues within the legislative branch concerning the implementation of populist policies. While such programs often gain traction during election seasons, they frequently face challenges related to funding, bureaucratic hurdles, and political will once implemented. As the debate continues, attention will remain focused on whether Cayetano can provide evidence supporting his claims against the administration. The situation highlights the need for transparency and follow-through in political commitments, especially as the country navigates economic uncertainties and social challenges.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

2 poročil

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 75Objektivnost 65pred 11 urami
Cayetano, ne Marcos, je kriv za neuspešno pomoč v višini 10.000 P. Palace

Filipinska predsedniška palača je zanikala trditev senatorja Alana Petra Cayetana, da je predsednik Ferdinand Marcos Jr. blokiral svoj predlagani program denarne pomoči v višini 10.000 P za vsako filipinsko družino. Po besedah podsekretarja Claire Castro, je propad predloga ležal pri samem Cayetanu, ki je uvedel ukrep, preden je Marcos prevzel funkcijo, in ga ni napredoval, ko je služil v kongresu. Palača je poudarila, da bi bil predlog, če bi bil izvedljiv, vključen v nacionalni proračun za leto 2022, ki je bil odobren, preden je Marcos postal predsednik. Castro je tudi ugotovil, da celo nekdanji predsednik Rodrigo Duterte, politični zaveznik Cayetana, ni bil prepričan o načrtu.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je senator Alan Peter Cayetano označen za odgovornega za neuspeh svojega predlaganega programa pomoči, in to pripisujejo njegovim " pomanjkljivostim ", " počasnemu tempu " in " nezmožnosti izpolnjevanja obljub " .

Zakaj dejstva (75): The article reports that Malacañang attributed the failure of the P10,000 aid proposal to Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano rather than President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., citing that the proposal was filed before Marcos took office. This aligns with the cross-source consensus that Cayetano's lack of progress an

Zakaj objektivnost (65): The tone is somewhat confrontational, with the Palace spokesperson directly criticizing Cayetano's performance and using emotionally charged language like 'slow pace' and 'jetski campaign promise.' The article frames the issue as a political dispute between Cayetano and the administration, showing b

GMA News Online logoGMA News OnlineNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 60Objektivnost 55predvčerajšnjim
Alan Peter Cayetano, ob podpisu pogodbe z Marcosom in P10K pomoči za manalo na volitvah 2022

Članek poroča, da je Alan Peter Cayetano obtožil Ferdinanda Marca mlajšega, da se je po zmagi na volitvah leta 2022 upiral programu denarne pomoči v višini 10.000 P. Trditev kaže, da je Marcos kritiziral pobudo za pomoč, ki je bila del širšega prizadevanja za socialno blaginjo administracije. Izjava pomeni politično nesoglasje glede gospodarskih politik in programov socialne podpore.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so obtožbe proti Marcosu označili za politično kritiko, kar pomeni, da njegov nasprotovanje programu pomoči odraža stališče, ki se ujema z bolj konzervativnimi ali ekonomsko previdnimi stališči.

Zakaj dejstva (60): This article states that President Marcos allegedly criticized the P10K aid proposal after winning the 2022 election, but it does not provide specific evidence or quotes to support this claim. It also mentions that the proposal was previously publicized in 2021 and 2022, which is consistent with oth

Zakaj objektivnost (55): The phrasing is highly biased, suggesting that Marcos 'allegedly' criticized the proposal, implying a lack of substantiation. The article appears to take a partisan stance in favor of Cayetano, presenting the narrative without balance or neutrality.

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe