ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Alan Dershowitz se je umaknil iz zaslišanja Epsteina, kar je sprožilo grožnjo s sodnim pozivom.
United States🏛️ PolitikaSredinapred 8 urami

Alan Dershowitz se je umaknil iz zaslišanja Epsteina, kar je sprožilo grožnjo s sodnim pozivom.

Odbor za nadzor in reforme vladi v Predstavni hiši je zagrozil, da bo sodil pravnemu učenjaku Alanu Dershowitzu, če ne bo pričal o svojem preteklem odnosu z obsojenim spolnim prestopnikom Jeffreyjem Epsteinom. Dershowitz, nekdanji profesor prava na Harvardu, ki je Epsteinu svetoval do leta 2019, se je sprva strinjal, da se bo pojavil pred odborom, vendar se je v zadnjem trenutku umaknil. Predsednik odbora James Comer je kritiziral Dershowitza, ker ni navedel razloga za svojo odsotnost, in mu ukazal, da se opravi razgovor za zaprtimi vrati.

Alan Dershowitz, the renowned criminal defense attorney and former Harvard Law professor, has withdrawn from a congressional hearing regarding his past association with Jeffrey Epstein, prompting the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to threaten a subpoena. The committee, led by Chairman James Comer, stated that Mr. Dershowitz had previously expressed willingness to testify about his relationship with Epstein but ultimately declined to appear for the scheduled hearing on Monday. In response, Mr. Comer issued a formal letter to Mr. Dershowitz, stating that his legal team had failed to provide a valid explanation for his absence and that this was unacceptable. The Oversight Committee is investigating Epstein's alleged involvement in sex trafficking, focusing on his connections with individuals such as Mr. Dershowitz. According to the committee, Mr. Dershowitz had served as a legal advisor to Epstein until their relationship ended in 2007 after Epstein pleaded guilty to state charges involving the solicitation of prostitution from a minor. Despite the termination of their professional ties, emails obtained from Epstein’s files reveal that Mr. Dershowitz maintained communication with him and continued to offer legal guidance up until 2019, the year Epstein died. Prior to his withdrawal, Mr. Dershowitz had shown interest in cooperating with the committee. He had participated in discussions about Epstein’s conduct, describing the financier’s behavior toward young women as concerning but not necessarily illegal. During a May interview on the podcast “Pod Force One,” Mr. Dershowitz claimed that Epstein was interested in teenagers aged 16 to 18, which he did not classify as pedophilia. Instead, he suggested that Epstein engaged in a form of transactional relationships, offering money in exchange for services such as massages. He further argued that some of the girls who received financial compensation from a victim fund had not actually met Epstein and were instead influenced by others to claim they had done so. Epstein, who died by suicide in a New York City jail in 2019 while awaiting federal charges, was accused of orchestrating a widespread sex trafficking network. His co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, currently serves a 20-year prison sentence for her role in facilitating these crimes. The Oversight Committee has been conducting a broad inquiry into Epstein’s operations, interviewing numerous high-profile figures linked to him, including Bill Gates and former President Bill Clinton. Among the upcoming witnesses is Jes Staley, a former banking executive whose career was impacted by his ties to Epstein. Staley recently lost an appeal against a UK financial regulator’s decision to bar him from the industry due to those connections. Despite the extensive list of witnesses, all have denied any direct participation in or awareness of Epstein’s alleged crimes. As the committee continues its investigation, the potential subpoena of Mr. Dershowitz underscores the seriousness of the inquiry and the pressure being placed on individuals with historical ties to Epstein. The situation highlights the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Epstein’s legacy and the broader implications of his alleged activities.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

1 poročil

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesStrankarsko povezanSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 8 urami
Alan Dershowitz se je umaknil iz zaslišanja Epsteina, kar je sprožilo grožnjo s sodnim pozivom.

Odbor za nadzor in reforme vladi v Predstavni hiši je zagrozil, da bo sodil pravnemu učenjaku Alanu Dershowitzu, če ne bo pričal o svojem preteklem odnosu z obsojenim spolnim prestopnikom Jeffreyjem Epsteinom. Dershowitz, nekdanji profesor prava na Harvardu, ki je Epsteinu svetoval do leta 2019, se je sprva strinjal, da se bo pojavil pred odborom, vendar se je v zadnjem trenutku umaknil. Predsednik odbora James Comer je kritiziral Dershowitza, ker ni navedel razloga za svojo odsotnost, in mu ukazal, da se opravi razgovor za zaprtimi vrati.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Medtem ko je tema politično občutljivo vprašanje, povezano s trgovino z ljudmi za spolne namene in pravno odgovornostjo, članek predstavlja tako ukrepe odbora kot Dershowitzeve trditve, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article provides details about Alan Dershowitz's refusal to testify and the committee's response, citing emails showing ongoing contact with Epstein until 2019. It references public statements and interviews, aligning with cross-source reporting on the topic. However, it does not include direct

Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article presents the situation from the perspective of the House Oversight Committee, emphasizing their stance and actions. While it reports facts neutrally, it uses terms like 'sex trafficker' and 'terrible thing' which may carry subjective weight, suggesting a slight editorial lean towards con

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe